- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/12/18 at 7:17 pm to Rex
quote:
Want to know the big difference? Mueller has gotten actual indictments, guilty pleas, and convictions. Waste of money, my arse.
So Mueller has indicted people connected with Trump on Russian collusion and rigging the election? Lol!
RexTurd, you’re my favorite Melt.
Posted on 11/12/18 at 7:19 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
el gaucho makes a better troll. your trolling is awful now, it lost it's essence.
It’s repetitive and weak, you’d think after being gone for awhile he would have picked up some game, naw.
Posted on 11/12/18 at 7:20 pm to Rex
James Comey is as big a douche as you are Rexie!
Posted on 11/12/18 at 7:23 pm to MrLarson
quote:
That isn't what James Comey stated on the record. In fact she committed many crimes.
That’s true^^^ Comey laid out enough illegal activities committed by Hilldawg that she was going to be indicted but then Comey said,
“No reasonable Swamp Skunk lawyer would recommend pursuing Hilldawg’s crimes, she’s clean to be our next POTUS”. Paraphrased!
Posted on 11/12/18 at 7:27 pm to NIH
Trump has mind fricked the Dems to such a degree that they have completely abandoned any pretense of civil libertarianism that they claimed to have during the Bush administration. Now the Dems on this board sound like authoritarians in their reflexive praise for the FBI and rogue prosecutors. The FBI doesn't prosecute innocent people. If you tell the truth you have nothing to worry about. What kind of fairy tale are you hypocritical fricks living in?
Posted on 11/12/18 at 7:37 pm to Rex
quote:Lois Rexcatur says hello!
"Perjury trap" is such a silly trope. Honest people are not afraid of being trapped by lies, and the FBI doesn't indict honest, inconsequential mistakes.
Posted on 11/12/18 at 7:39 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Guess what, do no talk to these MFERS, FIF!
Posted on 11/12/18 at 7:52 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:
Trump has mind fricked the Dems to such a degree that they have completely abandoned any pretense of civil libertarianism that they claimed to have during the Bush administration. Now the Dems on this board sound like authoritarians in their reflexive praise for the FBI and rogue prosecutors. The FBI doesn't prosecute innocent people. If you tell the truth you have nothing to worry about. What kind of fairy tale are you hypocritical fricks living in?
even better
from what it seems, they're creating a case of mini-treason based off of Trump's people possibly meeting with Russian operatives who told them they had hacked information, which Trump declined to access...and then it was released publicly anyway
is there anything more to the "collusion" accusations at this point?
Posted on 11/12/18 at 7:53 pm to SCLibertarian
It was her turn
Posted on 11/12/18 at 8:54 pm to Rex
quote:
Yes, in fact it was.
What Comey did in fact was outline in some detail a list of Hillary's crimes while exonerating her by making intent an element of them when it was not.
Where ya been dog? Hasn't been much of a prog/liberal target rich environment during your sabbatical. You haven't lost your capability to make outlandish statements that you actually seem to believe.
Posted on 11/12/18 at 10:30 pm to Mr. Misanthrope
quote:
What Comey did in fact was outline in some detail a list of Hillary's crimes while exonerating her by making intent an element of them when it was not.
Intent is written EXPLICITLY within those laws. But it hardly mattered, anyway, because by Comey's own admission there were ZERO emails on Hillary's server that qualified as "classified".
Posted on 11/12/18 at 10:33 pm to Rex
quote:
Intent is written EXPLICITLY within those laws. But it hardly mattered, anyway, because by Comey's own admission there were ZERO emails on Hillary's server that qualified as "classified".
Every time you resurface you seem more unhinged and your mental acuity is diminishing. Hilldawg destroyed subpoenaed evidence, she destroyed evidence. Wake up Rex! Rise and Shine!!!!!
Posted on 11/12/18 at 10:39 pm to MrLarson
quote:
Because Stone committed a crime or because Stone helped Trump get elected?
How about because Stone committed a crime while trying to get Trump elected.
Posted on 11/12/18 at 10:41 pm to Rex
quote:
there were ZERO emails on Hillary's server that qualified as "classified".
quote:Washington Post
Hillary Clinton wrote 104 emails that she sent using her private server while secretary of state that the government has since said contain classified information, according to a new Washington Post analysis of Clinton’s publicly released correspondence.
The finding is the first accounting of the Democratic presidential front-runner’s personal role in placing information now considered sensitive into insecure email during her State Department tenure. Clinton’s authorship of dozens of emails now considered classified could complicate her efforts to argue that she never put government secrets at risk.
So 104 classified emails, Rex, on her unsecured server, NOT ZERO. You’re wrong again.
This post was edited on 11/12/18 at 10:46 pm
Posted on 11/12/18 at 10:48 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Back before the election
Posted on 11/12/18 at 10:55 pm to Rex
quote:
James Comey, a lifelong Republican
Oh, one of those...
Like Ana Navarro?
This post was edited on 11/12/18 at 10:57 pm
Posted on 11/12/18 at 10:57 pm to Rex
quote:
"In looking back into our investigations into the mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of information exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here."
- James Comey
Since when does someone else have to have been charged with breaking a law before the subject of the investigation can be charged? Someone always has to be the first. Someone was the first person to be charged with murder. Someone was the first to be charged with RICO. Someone was even the first to be charged with bestiality after it was revealed they boned their dog
Posted on 11/12/18 at 11:02 pm to Rex
quote:
Want to know the big difference? Mueller has gotten actual indictments, guilty pleas, and convictions.
Waste of money, my arse.
How many has he charged with colluding with the Russians? Since when is Wikileaks a Russian website? Even if Roger Stone knew about the Podesta hack, what does that have to do with Russia?
Posted on 11/12/18 at 11:05 pm to texridder
quote:
How about because Stone committed a crime while trying to get Trump elected.
What crime was that? Something that swayed the election? Collusion with Russians? Remember the sham Mueller SC is trying to prove Trump/Russian collusion but they can’t and they won’t so Mueller has resorted to perjury traps and financial/tax crimes. You also need to remember, after two years of digging the investigation has nothing related to Trump/Russia collusion and the main suspect in the early part of the investigation centered on Carter Page, he was accused of being a Russian operative...., he’s still on TV telling his story and Mueller has moved on.
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News