- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
so who is the guy who calls down saying to challenge a play?
Posted on 10/9/18 at 2:27 pm
Posted on 10/9/18 at 2:27 pm
O said the guy in the booth never saw the replay so he never said they should challenge it
but anyone watching the game saw it live knew it should be looked at and worth a time out at least to get a look at the replay.
so who is "the guy" was he taking a piss at the time and never saw the live action play?
inquiring minds want to know because this is a huge problem that seems to be being ignored as nothing but a failure to be able to see the replay by O
but anyone watching the game saw it live knew it should be looked at and worth a time out at least to get a look at the replay.
so who is "the guy" was he taking a piss at the time and never saw the live action play?
inquiring minds want to know because this is a huge problem that seems to be being ignored as nothing but a failure to be able to see the replay by O
19
Posted on 10/9/18 at 2:28 pm to keakar
Even more Interesting since there are no challenges in college football
- update ..I was wrong and man enough to admit ..unlike most here
- update ..I was wrong and man enough to admit ..unlike most here
This post was edited on 10/9/18 at 4:03 pm
Posted on 10/9/18 at 2:29 pm to keakar
O should have at least called time out. That was dumb.
Posted on 10/9/18 at 2:31 pm to geauxdroddz
quote:
Even more Interesting since there are no challenges in college football
you dumb
Posted on 10/9/18 at 2:31 pm to geauxdroddz
quote:
Even more Interesting since there are no challenges in college football
Posted on 10/9/18 at 2:32 pm to geauxdroddz
quote:
Even more Interesting since there are no challenges in college football
fake news
Posted on 10/9/18 at 2:32 pm to keakar
I’m not sure who fricked up but it was a royal one. If anything you get on the headset and tell o to talk to the refs because it was close.
It’s such a huge spot in the game, that honestly could have been the difference.
That’s why attention to details are so critical and someone in that booth royally fricked up.
It’s such a huge spot in the game, that honestly could have been the difference.
That’s why attention to details are so critical and someone in that booth royally fricked up.
Posted on 10/9/18 at 2:33 pm to TigahTeeth
quote:
O should have at least called time out. That was dumb.
well if the guy upstairs never said anything, and O didnt have a good enough look to know one way or the other, i guess i cant fault O for just "assuming" the spot was correct and acting accordingly.
Posted on 10/9/18 at 2:35 pm to keakar
Same guy who helped Les with clock management. He got a promotion under the new regime
Posted on 10/9/18 at 2:36 pm to keakar
Agreed but that "person" should have been terminated Sunday.
Posted on 10/9/18 at 2:36 pm to keakar
So, O was the only person in the stadium not looking at the spot on that critical third down?
Posted on 10/9/18 at 2:36 pm to geauxdroddz
quote:
Even more Interesting since there are no challenges in college football
I’m not sure how you get something like this wrong. When’s the last time you watched a game??
Posted on 10/9/18 at 2:37 pm to keakar
quote:
so who is "the guy" was he taking a piss at the time and never saw the live action play?
Absolutely!
O doesn't call plays. He doesn't scheme. His sole jobs during the game are to decide when to go for it on 4th down; when to call TO's; when to kick a FG/punt; and when to challenge.
If he can't even do those things then what role does he play once the game starts?
He wasted a TO just to take a delay of game penalty and he refused to call a TO to challenge a clearly bad spot. That's unacceptable
Posted on 10/9/18 at 2:42 pm to keakar
quote:
O said the guy in the booth never saw the replay so he never said they should challenge it
but anyone watching the game saw it live knew it should be looked at and worth a time out at least to get a look at the replay.
You'd think.
Replay is a wonderful advancement in regards to in-game technology.
However they should absolutely have a human failsafe, with binoculars, watching the play to provide another point of information precisely for the situation O described.
Not saying he would've been able to tell for sure the spot, but we could all see on the broadcast that the spot was at least questionable. You buzz down and get them to take another look at it, then we'd get those other angles that I'm sure they had.
Maybe those other angles were also inconclusive, maybe they weren't. But now we will never know. That was a high leverage moment and Orgeron failed in his duties. No other way to slice it.
This post was edited on 10/9/18 at 2:43 pm
Posted on 10/9/18 at 2:44 pm to keakar
I don't see them reversing that play
Posted on 10/9/18 at 2:45 pm to nicholastiger
Mentioned this in another thread. The Video replay feed comes from UF in-stadium broadcast. They didn’t get the replay until after the field goal. UF’s fault. Still should of called a TO though
Posted on 10/9/18 at 2:47 pm to nicholastiger
quote:
I don't see them reversing that play
Irrelevant what you think would've happened.
We could all see that the spot was at the very least questionable. Given game situation, down and distance, you get that reviewed. Worst case scenario the play is upheld and you kick the FG anyway.
The potential gain far outweighs the risk right there.
This post was edited on 10/9/18 at 3:00 pm
Posted on 10/9/18 at 2:52 pm to keakar
this guy
Posted on 10/9/18 at 2:54 pm to BruceUnhinged
quote:
should of called a TO
Have. Should have. Or should've, which is a contraction of should have.
But, yes, a timeout should have been called
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News