- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
My theory is that Judge's Book is the epicenter of Ford's story...
Posted on 9/30/18 at 9:21 pm
Posted on 9/30/18 at 9:21 pm
...and none of this story could have existed without this stupid drunk-a-logue. Once Ford got a hold of the book she could piece together a story coming up with names, events, where Judge worked, etc.
Now, whether she did this unintentionally because she is mentally ill, or intentionally because she is a liberal and demented, is the real question. I guess it really doesn't matter because either way a man's life is being destroyed.
Now, whether she did this unintentionally because she is mentally ill, or intentionally because she is a liberal and demented, is the real question. I guess it really doesn't matter because either way a man's life is being destroyed.
Posted on 9/30/18 at 9:21 pm to Tigahs24Seven
Ding Ding Ding Ding
we have a winner
we have a winner
Posted on 9/30/18 at 9:22 pm to Tigahs24Seven
quote:
Now, whether she did this unintentionally because she is mentally il
quote:
or intentionally because she is a liberal and demented,
Same thang baw.
Posted on 9/30/18 at 9:24 pm to Tigahs24Seven
Posted on 9/30/18 at 9:37 pm to Tigahs24Seven
Has anyone asked what year did she buy the book?
Posted on 9/30/18 at 9:38 pm to Tigahs24Seven
Agree. This was brought up a few days ago as a likelihood.
Posted on 9/30/18 at 9:38 pm to Tigahs24Seven
Yeap.
That’s why she is bringing him into it.
I would wager there’s a PJ character that she backed Smyth into as well.
That’s why she is bringing him into it.
I would wager there’s a PJ character that she backed Smyth into as well.
Posted on 9/30/18 at 9:39 pm to Tigahs24Seven
Would be interesting to see if she purchased the book this year.
Posted on 9/30/18 at 9:41 pm to the808bass
What i think is funny is listen to the people on the left claim his book supports her claim. The left will not be happy even if she is proven to of made up a false claim.
Posted on 9/30/18 at 9:42 pm to the808bass
you know Mark feels like shite over this.
Is there anyone Dems won’t trample over for a couple political notches?
This guy is in recovery for substance abuse and lukemia. Such white privilege he enjoys.
Is there anyone Dems won’t trample over for a couple political notches?
This guy is in recovery for substance abuse and lukemia. Such white privilege he enjoys.
Posted on 9/30/18 at 9:43 pm to the808bass
quote:
Would be interesting to see if she purchased the book this year.
Spark up the Autist signal!
Posted on 9/30/18 at 9:46 pm to Tigahs24Seven
That’s been my stated theory here since day one. I guarantee the whole plot was hatched at the DNC or parts thereof , or brought to them to coordinate media strategy after carefully culling and deconstructing every detail of that book.
Posted on 9/30/18 at 9:50 pm to Tigahs24Seven
She told her therapist that she was assaulted in the mid 80's in her late teens by 4 boys. Kav would have been away at college.
She changed that story for the lawyers and for the Senate, but Judge apparently mentions in his book that he worked at Safeway in 1982. This is how she connects everything together, and likely why she harped on the Safeway meeting with judge.
I also believe this is why she can't recall how she got home. She drove, but her having a license doesn't fit with the timeline she needs to implicate Kav, so she conveniently leaves it out.
I think she was likely involved in some type of assault at squees house in the late 80's. This is what she shared with her therapist in 2012.
They dated in high school and he would have almost certainly wanted to get some from an ex over summer break. She simply changes a few characters, and the date. I just can't get it out of my head how perfectly squees house matches the scene, how she revealed they dated, and how quickly she shot down Whelens twitter theory on squee. I'm also hung up on how she remembers everyone at the party but not a homeowner. If she replaces squee with kav, the story loses its homeowner, an oversight on her part.
She changed that story for the lawyers and for the Senate, but Judge apparently mentions in his book that he worked at Safeway in 1982. This is how she connects everything together, and likely why she harped on the Safeway meeting with judge.
I also believe this is why she can't recall how she got home. She drove, but her having a license doesn't fit with the timeline she needs to implicate Kav, so she conveniently leaves it out.
I think she was likely involved in some type of assault at squees house in the late 80's. This is what she shared with her therapist in 2012.
They dated in high school and he would have almost certainly wanted to get some from an ex over summer break. She simply changes a few characters, and the date. I just can't get it out of my head how perfectly squees house matches the scene, how she revealed they dated, and how quickly she shot down Whelens twitter theory on squee. I'm also hung up on how she remembers everyone at the party but not a homeowner. If she replaces squee with kav, the story loses its homeowner, an oversight on her part.
This post was edited on 9/30/18 at 10:00 pm
Posted on 9/30/18 at 9:53 pm to djmicrobe
quote:
Has anyone asked what year did she buy the book?
She won't know.
Posted on 9/30/18 at 9:54 pm to Tigahs24Seven
quote:
intentionally because she is a leftist and demented
fify
Posted on 9/30/18 at 9:59 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
I also believe this is why she can't recall how she got home. She drove, but her having a license doesn't fit with the timeline she needs to implicate Kav, so she conveniently leaves it out. I think she was likely involved in some type of assault at squees house in the late 80's. This is what she shared with her therapist in 2012. They dated in high school and he would have almost certainly wanted to get some from an ex over summer break. She simply changes a few characters, and the date. I just can't get it out of my head how perfectly squees house matches the scene, how she revealed they dated, and how quickly she shot down Whelens twitter theory on squee. I'm also hung up on how she remembers everyone at the party but not a homeowner. If she replaces squee with kav, the story loses its homeowner, an oversight on her part
Where did you read this?
Posted on 9/30/18 at 9:59 pm to Tigahs24Seven
I subscribe to the woman scorned theory.
She had a crush on older guy Kav. He barely acknowledged her. It’s not inconceivable that someone as clearly damaged as she is could nurse a grudge over something like that over the course of 36 years. Stranger things have been known.
In fact, I’ll go so far as to say something may have actually happened to her and, in her bitter, confused state, she’s convinced herself that Kav did it.
The mind is a strange thing.
She had a crush on older guy Kav. He barely acknowledged her. It’s not inconceivable that someone as clearly damaged as she is could nurse a grudge over something like that over the course of 36 years. Stranger things have been known.
In fact, I’ll go so far as to say something may have actually happened to her and, in her bitter, confused state, she’s convinced herself that Kav did it.
The mind is a strange thing.
Posted on 9/30/18 at 10:01 pm to gsvar2004
Her own testimony and what we know of the therapists notes that they refuse to hand over unredacted.
Posted on 9/30/18 at 10:03 pm to Vacherie Saint
If you can figure this out....so can the FBI and the Senate investigators.
Posted on 9/30/18 at 10:04 pm to Vacherie Saint
Gotcha I hadn’t seen the therapist notes
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News