- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

247 Roster Talent Rankings for 2018 Released
Posted on 9/25/18 at 3:17 pm
Posted on 9/25/18 at 3:17 pm
247 ranks each teams roster talent every year. There was a lot of talk before the season about the lack of talent on the roster after transfers. Here’s how the rankings shook out:
1. Ohio State
2. Bama
3. UGA
4. USC
5. Clemson
6. LSU
.
.
.
12. Florida
.
14. Auburn
15. Texas A&M
.
.
.
20. Ole Miss
.
22. Mississippi State
LINK
So, it looks like we are the third most talented team in the conference. There’s NO reason we shouldn’t go 10-2 in the regular season.
1. Ohio State
2. Bama
3. UGA
4. USC
5. Clemson
6. LSU
.
.
.
12. Florida
.
14. Auburn
15. Texas A&M
.
.
.
20. Ole Miss
.
22. Mississippi State
LINK
So, it looks like we are the third most talented team in the conference. There’s NO reason we shouldn’t go 10-2 in the regular season.
This post was edited on 9/25/18 at 3:19 pm
Posted on 9/25/18 at 3:20 pm to UpToPar
Damn, USC. Also Florida State and Tennessee
This post was edited on 9/25/18 at 3:21 pm
Posted on 9/25/18 at 3:21 pm to UpToPar
We fell from 907.1 last year to 889.91 this year, not surprising though considering a lot of star talent from last year's team did leave and we had one of worst recruiting classes by recruiting ratings in 2018 in a while. If we can finish 2019 class strong, could go back up potentially.
Posted on 9/25/18 at 3:21 pm to UpToPar
I don’t believe UGA and USC have more talent than LSU.
Posted on 9/25/18 at 3:21 pm to 1999
quote:
muh rebuild
O sucks at recruiting too.
Posted on 9/25/18 at 3:22 pm to LSU Patrick
What?
Eta: What does Orgeron's ability to recruit have to do with claiming that he inherited a rebuild?
Eta: What does Orgeron's ability to recruit have to do with claiming that he inherited a rebuild?
This post was edited on 9/25/18 at 3:26 pm
Posted on 9/25/18 at 3:23 pm to TigahTeeth
quote:
I don’t believe UGA and USC have more talent than LSU.
Dont pay attention to recruiting much then? UGA has recruited their butts off recently. USC never has fallen down much, they get the pick of the litter out west pretty much.
Posted on 9/25/18 at 3:24 pm to LSU Patrick
quote:
O sucks at recruiting too.
huh
Posted on 9/25/18 at 3:30 pm to UpToPar
Talent was more of a problem last year, where most of our good players were Freshmen and in some cases, sophomores. We are very talented this year but still in a spot where we have guys learning on the fly.
While we will eventually see an "addition by subtraction" situation on offense from last year to this year, it hasn't happened yet because of injuries to the OL & the uncommon transfer of a starting QB in June. The new offense install is a topic for another day, and has been talked about ad nauseam
While we will eventually see an "addition by subtraction" situation on offense from last year to this year, it hasn't happened yet because of injuries to the OL & the uncommon transfer of a starting QB in June. The new offense install is a topic for another day, and has been talked about ad nauseam
Posted on 9/25/18 at 3:31 pm to LSU Patrick
quote:he does?
O sucks at recruiting too.
Posted on 9/25/18 at 3:32 pm to UpToPar
Yet If we go 10-2, these people will still bitch. It's an always floating target
Posted on 9/25/18 at 3:33 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:whose these people? 10-2 would be great
et If we go 10-2, these people will still bitch. It's an always floating target
Posted on 9/25/18 at 3:33 pm to Lester Earl
Posted on 9/25/18 at 3:34 pm to UpToPar
These rankings mean little unless compared with the talent per position group. I’d like to see a breakdown of that.
Posted on 9/25/18 at 3:35 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Yet If we go 10-2, these people will still bitch. It's an always floating target
No, 10 regular season wins has been the target average. Everyone says that. No floating. You're making that up or hypothesizing erroneously.
I've seen this repeated over and over and over. From both optimistic and pessimistic fans on here.
ETA:
Added *regular season wins
This post was edited on 9/25/18 at 3:37 pm
Posted on 9/25/18 at 3:37 pm to RogerTheShrubber
pretty sure the mantra of this board has been "10-2 no excuses".
Posted on 9/25/18 at 3:38 pm to UpToPar
quote:
UpToPar
Did you read the rest of his post "...where most of our good players were Freshmen and in some cases, sophomores."
A 5 star player with three years in the system is normally a bigger advantage than a 5 star freshman. So Derrius Guice was more valuable and more effective than JaCoby Stevens last year. Rashard Lawrence is way more important than Terrace Marshall this year.
Posted on 9/25/18 at 3:41 pm to UpToPar
quote:
We were actually MORE talented last year
even more reason why this list is pointless.
when you have former 4 and 5 star guys going undrafted or in the 6th-7th round that shows inaccurate ranking and/or poor development
Last year was not more talented than this years team. Players change, high school rankings never do
Popular
Back to top

19







