Started By
Message
locked post

Study Finds Increased Incarceration Has Marginal-to-Zero Impact on Crime

Posted on 8/7/18 at 10:57 am
Posted by Big_Sur
Member since Nov 2012
1123 posts
Posted on 8/7/18 at 10:57 am
Believe this or not?

https://eji.org/news/study-finds-increased-incarceration-does-not-reduce-crime

Over the past two decades, 19 states have successfully decreased both imprisonment and crime rates, using crime prevention, alternative-to-incarceration, and community corrections approaches. Vera reports that the state with the largest drop in incarceration rates (New Jersey, with a 37 percent decrease between 2000 and 2015) also saw a 30 percent decrease in crime rates during this period. West Virginia, with the largest increase in incarceration rates (83 percent), experienced a 4 percent increase in crime rates. Indeed, only four states in this period experienced increases in crime rates, and all four also saw increased incarceration rates.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33598 posts
Posted on 8/7/18 at 11:01 am to
quote:

Believe this or not?
Of course. This has been known in the field for years. I mentioned it in another thread just the other day about New York.

I think it's actually likely that prison breeds criminal behavior. We know that the drug trade flourishes in prison. And given just how punitive all aspects of the system are for ex-cons, recidivism is very likely.
Posted by mtntiger
Asheville, NC
Member since Oct 2003
26666 posts
Posted on 8/7/18 at 11:01 am to
All I know is that study after study of who's committing the crimes shows that it's a very small percentage of the population who commit most of the crimes. Seems to me that if those people are locked away, then crime should decrease.

You can still do your community policing and other preventative things, but locking up career criminals seems to me to be a no-brainer.
Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 8/7/18 at 11:02 am to
The authors of this study should invite convicts into their homes.
Posted by Lg
Hayden, Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
6860 posts
Posted on 8/7/18 at 11:02 am to
So in essence, they leave the criminals to take care of other criminals instead of incarceration leaving a vacuum that many criminals try to fill. Makes sense. Looks like that's what they are trying to accomplish in Chicago. Criminals tried to remove 70 other criminals just this past weekend.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
261680 posts
Posted on 8/7/18 at 11:05 am to
Actually it does. Mass incarceration in the early 90s had a profound affect on vpcrime rates.
Posted by timdonaghyswhistle
Member since Jul 2018
16326 posts
Posted on 8/7/18 at 11:06 am to
I could have told you the results of that study the second I clicked on the link and saw the website it came from.
This post was edited on 8/7/18 at 11:07 am
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
120416 posts
Posted on 8/7/18 at 11:08 am to
Prisons allow too much prisoner interaction which breeds more antisocial behavior.

Prisons should be largely solitary confinement with minimal prisoner interaction.
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79360 posts
Posted on 8/7/18 at 11:08 am to
What I would buy is to see recidivism rates for previous offenders who were offered alternative-to-incarceration programs. To me, that is where the true results will be found.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112611 posts
Posted on 8/7/18 at 11:10 am to
Shoot em. Save money. Big impact on crime.
Posted by Oddibe
Close to some, further from others
Member since Sep 2015
6568 posts
Posted on 8/7/18 at 11:10 am to
quote:

using crime prevention, alternative-to-incarceration, and community corrections approaches
Without knowing the details of the above these statistics are pretty meaningless.
Posted by alphaandomega
Tuscaloosa
Member since Aug 2012
13635 posts
Posted on 8/7/18 at 11:35 am to
All I know is of someone commits a crime and is in prison that person wont be commuting any further crimes while they are in the clink, so society is safer.

Hell, many convicts are probably on government assistance while they are out robbing, stabbing, and stealing. So the cost of imprisoning them is offset by their not receiving any housing, obamaphone and EBT.

That is a win\win.
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
57823 posts
Posted on 8/7/18 at 11:56 am to
Incarceration has little to do with discouraging criminals from committing the initial crime.

The important thing is keeping them off the streets, making them pay penance, and hopefully not being repeat offenders
Posted by Harry Rex Vonner
American southerner
Member since Nov 2013
35959 posts
Posted on 8/7/18 at 11:56 am to
bullshite
Posted by mauser
Orange Beach
Member since Nov 2008
21736 posts
Posted on 8/7/18 at 12:32 pm to
Prison is worthless unless you're looking at people that need to stay in there for 20 years or more. I'm all for hand and finger lopping for thieves. For dumbass dopers I'm all for giving them what they want for free.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 8/7/18 at 12:59 pm to
They don’t commit crime while locked.
Posted by Lsuchs
Member since Apr 2013
8073 posts
Posted on 8/7/18 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

Vera reports that the state with the largest drop in incarceration rates (New Jersey, with a 37 percent decrease between 2000 and 2015) also saw a 30 percent decrease in crime rates during this period.


Maybe the decrease in crime led to the decrease in incarceration?
This post was edited on 8/7/18 at 1:26 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram