Started By
Message

re: I don't understand why there is any debate regarding Burrow

Posted on 5/11/18 at 9:08 am to
Posted by atltiger6487
Member since May 2011
18195 posts
Posted on 5/11/18 at 9:08 am to
quote:

Exactly, not to mention all the hype we’ve heard about Brennan the past 2 years.
I'll be honest, I never saw much during Brennan's freshman year (yes I know, he didn't play much) that showed he's a stud.

He looked like just another average QB. I wasn't expecting him to come in and dominate, but I was looking for the "it" factor and some extreme arm talent. I just didn't see it.

And now that he can't beat out McMillan and Narcisse - well, that tells me all I need to know.
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
20086 posts
Posted on 5/11/18 at 9:14 am to
As long as we don't straight up promise him the starting job, I see no reason not to bring him in. I see no way that he doesn't make it a better competition which the whole team would benefit from.
Posted by Lonnie4LSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2008
9525 posts
Posted on 5/11/18 at 9:19 am to
It does beg the question that if the staff is so sold on one of the three quarterbacks currently on the roster being capable of leading this team, why jump into the ring for a shot at bringing in a new, unproven guy at this late date?

Kinda increases my concerns for the coming yr.
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16038 posts
Posted on 5/11/18 at 9:21 am to
quote:

The 3 QB's battling for starter will get their feelings hurt and 1 or 2 or even all 3 could make the decision and leave.

OMG, drama queen much?

what if we always thought like that. I guess we shouldn't have taken Giles or Fehoka because ALL the other WR's and DT's could have gotton upset and left the team?
Posted by Paul Allen
Montauk, NY
Member since Nov 2007
75386 posts
Posted on 5/11/18 at 9:33 am to
True
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33794 posts
Posted on 5/11/18 at 9:45 am to
quote:

As long as we don't straight up promise him the starting job, I see no reason not to bring him in. I see no way that he doesn't make it a better competition which the whole team would benefit from.


I think Orgeron promises him playing time. We're desperate.
Posted by OT_10
Northshore
Member since Sep 2016
216 posts
Posted on 5/11/18 at 9:50 am to
O has lost control of Grad Transfers...
Posted by husslemane
Member since Oct 2014
1321 posts
Posted on 5/11/18 at 9:51 am to
quote:

who you think might have the talent to help your team


That's why there is debate. Needs to be a little more sure than that.
This post was edited on 5/11/18 at 9:54 am
Posted by memphis tiger
Memphis, TN
Member since Feb 2006
20720 posts
Posted on 5/11/18 at 10:00 am to
quote:

If you have the chance to bring in someone who you think might have the talent to help your team you do it.




I think some of you guys just imagine things.

There is really little debate as to weather we should be recruiting him. Consensus, even from people like me who don’t like Ed, think it’s a good idea to bring him in if we can.


My question is simply how good is this guy really? He can’t get in the field at Ohio State. He had a great spring game in 2016, but all LSU fans know that spring games are fools gold.

Some of you act like this kids gonna come in and instantly we are in the playoffs. I’d just like to see him in real game action before I buy in.
This post was edited on 5/11/18 at 10:01 am
Posted by roygu
Member since Jan 2004
11718 posts
Posted on 5/11/18 at 10:01 am to
quote:

I agree that we bring anyone who might help LSU. My issue is with the people acting like he is some All-American with titles under his belt.

He's a career backup who will have to come in and learn a whole new system in two months.

Can he do that AND beat three guys with a 6-month headstart? Possible, but not likely.

Take him, yes, but don't expect him to come in and set the world on fire.




Who? is acting like he is an All America?

Career backup. Lee, JJ, Flynn, Etling, Mett, Who in that group started as a freshman and who was a career backup?

Did the freshman starters make and NFL Roster? Please explain your attack on career backups.

None of our young QBs have started agame but so we don't know who will earn the start. We do know that we don't have an experienced QB. One more quality prospect on the roster will at least give us a better chance at success.
Posted by memphis tiger
Memphis, TN
Member since Feb 2006
20720 posts
Posted on 5/11/18 at 10:10 am to
quote:


Who? is acting like he is an All America



Several people.

One guy even said yesterday that we are an SEC title contender the day he gets on campus.

Based on what exactly??
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
48193 posts
Posted on 5/11/18 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

Because we want to see LSU recruit and develop a QB from freshman to quality starter. That hasn't happened since Flynn, except for Lee's senior campaign.
it won't ever happen if we don't have faith in them... This is a big frick you to the quarterbacks we have
Posted by Cajun Catfish
Member since May 2016
695 posts
Posted on 5/11/18 at 1:12 pm to
He’s not coming here unless O promises him the starting position. Why would he transfer to LSU if there was anyway he would just be the backup. He has to play now if he thinks he can play at the next level.. or he’s not coming.
Posted by Cajun Catfish
Member since May 2016
695 posts
Posted on 5/11/18 at 1:19 pm to
Could it be we have an idiot for a head coach. I mean he has handled the QB situation and the offense in general so outstandingly since he has been at LSU and quite frankly evervwhere else he has been. It’s been a O shite show everywhere he goes. Prove me wrong or here we go again.
Posted by JohnnyU
Florida
Member since Nov 2006
12350 posts
Posted on 5/11/18 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

t's a chess match. The 3 QB's battling for starter will get their feelings hurt and 1 or 2 or even all 3 could make the decision and leave. Then there would be only 1 QB in Burrow and he could leave for the NFL after 1 season. Or a loss or 2 of the qb's before Burrow makes a decision to sign then there would real trouble.



Holy speculation Batman!!!
Burrow hasn't committed. He may or may not.
If there is attrition resulting from him coming here then so be it. Brennan and Narcisse both knew they would be competing against each other when they decided on LSU. Further they had every reasonable expectation that LSU would land another quarterback this past year. Would there be all this hand-wringing if LSU had landed a 5* QB this past recruiting cycle?
McMillan should have never had a reasonable expectation of starting when he committed. The fact that he's in a position to start says a lot about his current competition.
If they're scared they should get a dog.
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33794 posts
Posted on 5/11/18 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

He’s not coming here unless O promises him the starting position. Why would he transfer to LSU if there was anyway he would just be the backup. He has to play now if he thinks he can play at the next level.. or he’s not coming.


Don't know if he has to be promised starter but he's going to be promised playing time for certain.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 5/11/18 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

Because we want to see LSU recruit and develop a QB from freshman to quality starter. That hasn't happened since Flynn, except for Lee's senior camp


Well hell. I want that too.

But, that really is unrelated to my OP. Either the guy can potentially help or not. If he can, you try and get him and, well..........we haven't been developing QBs.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 5/11/18 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

Two of them are literally teenagers.

I realize we've pussified our culture to the point that we can't bring ourselves to call 18-19 year old men......men.

But that's not a me problem
Posted by Dudebro2
San Diego
Member since Dec 2011
8967 posts
Posted on 5/11/18 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

I don't understand why there is any debate regarding Burrow


There isn't a debate. If the coaches think Burreaux can help LSU and Burreaux feels LSU is the place for him , then there is a great chance he will come here. No debate about it, it is literally that simple.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
28753 posts
Posted on 5/11/18 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

Don't know if he has to be promised starter but he's going to be promised playing time for certain.


He could have had "playing time" at OSU. He wants to be a starting QB. That's why he's transferring. Otherwise, he stays at OSU and competes for playing time. Right now he's the college equivalent of a free agent. He only has two years of eligibility left and he's going to sign with the place that gives him what he wants, the starting job. O may say all the right things to the fans and media about "competition", but the kid isn't coming unless he has been "promised" to be the starter. He can go several places and "compete" for the job. But I doubt that's what he's looking to do. He obviously couldn't be the starter at OSU. He wants to go to a place where he can.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram