- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "You Disgust Me"-David Hogg replies to Sheriff David A. Clarke
Posted on 2/25/18 at 1:44 am to UpToPar
Posted on 2/25/18 at 1:44 am to UpToPar
quote:
You’ve proven your ignorance on all things constitutional over the last few days. That’s the good things about polarizing events like this. It makes it easy to identify the posters that have no idea what they’re talking about.
You saying that shows your ignorance.
Instead of making a stupid generalized statement, why don't you pick out something particular you think I was wrong about, so you can spotlight your nescience.
.
0
Posted on 2/25/18 at 2:05 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I love how progs say this constantly thinking it avpctually means something.
It does actually mean something. It means he wasn't a lifelong Democrat.
He was also a Navy Pilot. Which means he wasn't a draft dodger.
He was also in the FBI. Which should mean something to you, unless you have something against law enforcement.
This post was edited on 2/25/18 at 2:09 am
Posted on 2/25/18 at 2:49 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:.
Its been explained to you several times. Without drawing pictures, theres no other way youll ever get it if you havent by now.
No. t hasn't been explained to me. You are all ducking the question.
The OP was about Hogg's "You disgust me" response to Clarke's rant about the survivor's being puppets.
So if you criticize Hogg's 'you disgust me' response, then you must think that Clarke's remark was OK, because why else would Hogg's response deserve criticism?
See how easy it is?
Posted on 2/25/18 at 3:05 am to texridder
quote:
See how easy it is?
Putting children on the same platform with experienced adults is the origin of your fallacy.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 3:33 am to texridder
quote:
Clarke is a jackass.
You libs really do hate black people that leave the plantation.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 3:38 am to texridder
You are as obnoxious and unhinged as the little shite is.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 7:01 am to mountaintop
quote:
Clarke, a far right wing activist, accused plagiarist, and conspiracy theorist is the former Milwaukee County sheriff and Trump surrogate who at one point had announced he had accepted a job in Department of Homeland Security, only to see that disappear.
On Tuesday, Clarke claimed the Marjory Stoneman Douglas high school student survivors who are now successfully fighting the gun lobby had been orgainzed by George Soros. Soros is favorite target of the right.
hmmmm - nice show of fairness right there.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 7:12 am to Sentrius
quote:
David Hogg reads this board.
Probably has an arky hog by his username too.
ETA: Or bangs his dog.
This post was edited on 2/25/18 at 7:13 am
Posted on 2/25/18 at 7:14 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:Yeah, no bias whatsoever.
hmmmm - nice show of fairness right there.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 7:24 am to Scoop
quote:I would bet that the Dems will trot him out at the next Democratic National Convention.
He is gonna flame out hard.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 7:26 am to texridder
quote:m
The OP was about Hogg's "You disgust me" response to Clarke's rant about the survivor's being puppets. So if you criticize Hogg's 'you disgust me' response, then you must think that Clarke's remark was OK, because why else would Hogg's response deserve criticism? See how easy it is?
False premise. Just because you aren't bright enough to wrap your mind around the other reasons one might be able to criticize Hogg without agreeing with Clarke, does not mean it is impossible.
You seem to have a consistent problem with this. You can't comprehend pretty simple concepts and require the entire debate be confined to your limited capacity. That isn't how it works.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 7:30 am to mountaintop
Gee, no bias in that article. Nope. None.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 7:34 am to mtntiger
quote:
Gee, no bias in that article. Nope. None.
quote:
mountaintop
quote:COLLUSION!
mtntiger
Posted on 2/25/18 at 7:38 am to texridder
quote:
Don't change the subject. You gonna defend Clarke. Let's hear it.
Dat false dichotomy doe.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 7:41 am to texridder
quote:
So if you criticize Hogg's 'you disgust me' response, then you must think that Clarke's remark was OK, because why else would Hogg's response deserve criticism?
My God, how simplistic is your world view?
Posted on 2/25/18 at 7:41 am to texridder
quote:
So if you criticize Hogg's 'you disgust me' response, then you must think that Clarke's remark was OK, because why else would Hogg's response deserve criticism?
Uh what? I can completely think they are both attention seeking shite heads.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 7:41 am to texridder
quote:
Don't change the subject. You gonna defend Clarke. Let's hear it
I'll defend him.
He's right.
This entire thing was in the can and ready to go before Cruz ever opened fire.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 7:46 am to Wolfhound45
quote:
Gee, no bias in that article. Nope. None.
quote:
mountaintop
quote:
mtntiger
COLLUSION!
Oh no! They're onto us.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 8:12 am to texridder
quote:
accusing progs of being whiny betas
progs are whiny betas.
Posted on 2/25/18 at 8:28 am to texridder
He is being propped up by the left and the latest talking head.
Doesn’t mean that Clarke is right either.
Those two aren’t dependent upon each other.
Doesn’t mean that Clarke is right either.
Those two aren’t dependent upon each other.
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News