re: Question for libtards re: arming teachers.

quote:

---

So then let's have Marshalls/ armed vets at schools.

I don't think arming teachers is the way to go.

---

Why not both? Seems to be working just fine in Texas.

LINK

quote:

---

Here is the process to carry a firearm in the Argyle school district, according to a recent ABC report:

To become a school marshal, those employees must undergo extensive active shooter and firearms training with the state. They must also undergo a mental health evaluation. They receive a school marshal designation by the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement and must renew their license every two years by undergoing the same training and evaluation. Outside of campuses in Keene and Argyle, signs warn visitors that there are staff members who are armed and are prepared to protect children.

---

quote:

---

We can't currently stop teachers from rubbing their vaginas on students. Last thing I want is for those teachers to have a loaded pistol in the classroom. 

---

They might use the gun as a prop during fetish sex with the student?

Why can’t people carry on airplanes? Wouldn’t that eliminate the need to waste tax dollars on Air Marshals?

Loaded guns in the classroom. Sounds like the perfect learning environment.

And no solutions

quote:

---

Loaded guns in the classroom. Sounds like the perfect learning environment.

---

You must have been one of the whiny hand wringing liberals in 2001 that worried about Air Marshals shooting a hole in the fuselage and crashing the plane.

my neighbors have a security system sign in their yard but don't have a security system. And they've never been robbed. So just advertise "Our Teachers Pack Heat". Put a couple of signs in the yard. That oughta be enough.

The title of this thread is representative of how these sports boards pander to the more right leaning posters.

They always call names, I mean at every site. It's ignored till somebody comes back at them with similar language, then the thread is locked, nuked or the person responding to the insults gets banned.

quote:

---

In theory, it sounds like a strong deterrent. In reality, do we really want kids learning in an environment where they know there are armed people walking around?

---

Wow you’re right!
I’m sure the kids would feel much safer being fish in a barrel waiting for some nutjob to come along and start shooting at will with no fear of anyone shooting back.

The current environment is neither safe nor healthy so I’m not sure why we are worried about how safe or healthy it would be if guns were in the hands of teachers.

Y’all are such twats. I mean, it’s really not hard to figure out why this solution would be effective. You give extra money for teachers whom are willing to do carry but the cost is still less than that of two SRO’s. More SRO’s aren’t happening. Nobody ever knows who they are or where the guns are located. Those teachers that are pack have to under go 2 month training every summer and during spring, winter, and fall breaks. They must get renewed psychological exams ever year or two. If anyone finds out that they are in possession of a weapon they lose their teaching certificate.

You say it kinda sounds like a prison, well it’s very much like a prison that inmates run. The kids run the show in schools as is. Why not go ahead and arm teachers to prepare the a significant portion of population what they will experience in future. (kidding sorta)

But seriously, if a teacher wanted to hurt a kid they could easily do so without a gun. You think they are all of a sudden going to start shooting kids when they have confidential access to weapons. If so y’all are more dense than the speds.