:rotflmao: :rotflmao:

even if guys up north (and subsequently down here) are banned from hunting in standing ag crops.... there is still no till farming... and the fact that standing crops could be left to hold but not hunt ducks..

refusing to acknowledge that severely degraded habitat here and drastically changing land use practices here are a huge part of the equation is short sighted at best - our side of the street in this is by no means the cleanest side.

one simply has to look at canada geese on the east coast to see waterfowl will adapt and change when land use practice change to give them a better deal.....

This post was edited on 4/8/18 at 9:47 am

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Cowboyfan89

Member since Sep 2015

12728 posts

Posted on 2/10/18 at 9:45 am to choupiquesushi

Reading their Facebook group is pretty good. Not much discussion, but a couple of fellas just keep going on and on about how hunting over floodes corn fields is illegal (it's not) because it's not a normal agricultural operation. Then another ole boy started challenging them about how it's no different than hunting over a flooded 2nd rice crop.

Apparently rice fields (you know, ag land) are considered providing habitat and conservation, while flooded corn fields are not. You know, one ag field is and one ag field isn't, even though both are providing food and cover...lmao!

quote:
They’re gonna have a long row to hoe if they think they’re gonna get states to pass laws to make less money.

No shite, huh?! A bunch of whiny duck hunters from Louisiana are going to go to the feds and get a law changed that hasn't changed in decades. Sure, ok.

I mean, it sucks what has happened to Louisiana duck hunting, but man, this just sounds like a bunch of whiny liberals.

This post was edited on 2/10/18 at 9:49 am

2 ...

Report Post

Outdoor Board - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board