Started By
Message

re: Just overheard a guy say "slavery wasn't racist"

Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:04 am to
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
35334 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:04 am to
Shhhhhh don't tell them how honest abe wanted to send all the blacks to the sugar/cocoa/banana plantations in the Caribbean and South America.

Where the treatment of slaves was hundreds times worse.

But hey. Abe was a swell guy!
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:04 am to
quote:

Thanks. The blatant racism in this thread wasn't enough. We also needed some anti-semitism


Lol
You’re welcome. You have to admit, though, that Jews are given special protection in these discussions. Or don’t you admit that?
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:05 am to
quote:

Yes but this thread’s main topic is still racism and slavery and seeing that the most upvoted comments are about how it’s not racist it seems that many of the people here still hold that view.


I would hope you could figure out why using upvotes to measure is ill advised.

The thread has actually had interesting discussion with not even all the conservatives in agreement.

Just sayin.......
Posted by CarrolltonTiger
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2005
50291 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:05 am to
quote:

Racism, in the sense we currently understand is a result of slavery.


Perhaps by yourself, but I doubt by anyone more rational.

First, if that were so then there would be no claims of racism by other minorites that were not ever enslaved. Irish, Italians, Chinese were not slaves in the US but all have suffered group discrimination.

Second, I suspect many if not most people would who have disdain have as much disdain for African Americans had they not been slaves based upon their behavior. It is much more rational to judge a group by what they do today than what they did or were part of hundreds of years ago.

Finally, slavery is more complex than you suggest, sometimes purely economic, sometimes a just solution as a result of wars, sometimes a result of other disasters. The fact I had some ancestors that fell into slavery as the result of the collapse of say the Byzantine Empire and coould have been slaves as late as the 19th century in the Ottoman Empire doesn't cause them to be victims of racism today.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83695 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:05 am to
quote:

This is a huge stretch, though. The Romans enslaved everybody they encountered, even other Latins. They enslaved (white people) Gauls, other Celts, Germans, Greeks, (brown)North Africans and Middle Easterners, as well as (black) Nubians, etc.

If we say everything is racism, then nothing is.



It isn't a huge stretch. It is the literal definition.

When one group feels superior to another group based off physical characteristics, heritage, culture, etc

Just because we have dumbed it down to just "color of skin" doesn't change the actual definition.

This post was edited on 2/9/18 at 11:07 am
Posted by Machine
Earth
Member since May 2011
6001 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:06 am to
quote:

Do English better.
more irony!
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:06 am to
quote:

I have no idea using the actual definition of race is making a word useless.


I'll bite.

Describe, specifically, a white person being racist against whites.(or any other race example)
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25348 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:06 am to
His comments in 1858 during the Douglas debates make him a very difficult character. He has since been (pardon the term) "whitewashed" and now he is lionized by people unfamiliar with his actual political positions.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83695 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:07 am to
quote:

Describe, specifically, a white person being racist against whites.(or any other race example)


enslaving Irish

Posted by JOJO Hammer
Member since Nov 2010
11948 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:07 am to
quote:

Slavery involved the ownership of other human beings of a different race.


Wrong. Slavery is simply ownership of another human being. Race has nothing to do with it. Black people owned (and in some parts still own) black slaves. White people owned white slaves it goes on and on. Since be beginning of time when one group or civilization conquer another they took slaves. Race did and still does not play a part.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:08 am to
quote:

When one group feels superior to another group based off physical characteristics, heritage, culture, etc


Um. What?

That's not the definition of racism.

Sheesh.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89811 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:08 am to
quote:

When one group feels superior to another group based off physical characteristics, heritage, culture, etc


So, jocks picking on nerds is racist? Rich people moving away from the poors is racist?

FFS - when you cheapen the use of a word so that it is meaningless, you are not doing your side any good at all in the argument. I'll concede that there might be "other than skin color" factors in race evaluation, but that's the starting point and overwhelming factor. But to suggest that English looking down on Scots or Irishmen being racist seems utterly counterproductive to any sincere argument on race, with all due respect.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:08 am to
quote:

enslaving Irish

Well, now that I've seen that you're conflating the definition of bigotry with the definition of racism...........
Posted by Jake_LaMotta
Coral Gables
Member since Sep 2017
5700 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:08 am to
quote:

Arguably as bad as, or worse than, genocide.


Um no. What would you have rather been? A Jewish person in a concentration camp awaiting to be shot, gassed, or burned to death after being ripped away from your family and having all your wealth taken away or alive on a plantation somewhere able to eat and have a chance of survival? I know which one I would choose.

There is no event worse than The Holocaust. The difference is Jewish people were able to rebound and overcome their persecution to regain a position in the Global society.
This post was edited on 2/9/18 at 11:09 am
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83695 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:09 am to
I'll ask again

someone define race for me
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:09 am to
quote:

So, jocks picking on nerds is racist? Rich people moving away from the poors is racist?


Where the frick did he get that definition anyway?

I mean, I've no doubt that liberals are running with it..........but LOL
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:10 am to
quote:

someone define race for me

Dude, you just delivered a definition of "racism" that is NOT a definition of racism.

LOL.

Your definition of racism would include me hating bald people.
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
35334 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:10 am to


Bigotry =/= racism

Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
49051 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:10 am to
quote:

more irony!
. Good! Now you are getting it. That is a correct use of the word irony. And if you failed to see that was intentional, your sense of humor needs as much work as your vocabulary.
This post was edited on 2/9/18 at 11:11 am
Posted by Machine
Earth
Member since May 2011
6001 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:10 am to
quote:

your sense of humor needs as much work as your vernacular.
omg are you trying to kill me with irony today?
Jump to page
Page First 10 11 12 13 14 ... 22
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 22Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram