Started By
Message

re: Uranium One informant names Clinton

Posted on 2/8/18 at 9:34 am to
Posted by fouldeliverer
Lannisport
Member since Nov 2008
13538 posts
Posted on 2/8/18 at 9:34 am to
quote:

You think Putin wanted Trump over Hillary, and you are calling someone else stupid.


fricking hell you people are so damn ignorant it astounds me. It wouldn't be an issue if you weren't so arrogant about it.


Why Putin wanted Trump

Basically, he blamed her for the widespread protests that occurred in 2011. The Duma elections which is the lower (but more powerful) house of their congress, The Federation Assembly, had instances of widespread ballot stuffing, fraud, and glaring irregularities. For example, in some precincts, United Russia had 99% of the vote. In others, more people voted for United Russia than total voters registered. These acts of election day fraud are on top of all the various measures used to limit opposition parties beforehand. Most prominently he changed the entire legislative electoral system from a mixed system of single-member district/proportional representation to a purely proportional one to stack the Duma (and then changed it back) Anyway, she told the truth for once and stated how rigged they were. This pissed Putin the frick off. And when the large-scale protests started spreading he blamed her for them. He even suggested the State Dept was paying the protestors. This isn't the only reason. She also made fun of Bush after he said that he could trust Putin after he saw his soul. She said, Putin, as a former KGB agent didn't have a soul. There's much more and I can get into more detail if you want and if I have time later.

This isn't even fricking debatable man. There are many quotes by Putin and Clinton. Get out of your crazy right-wing circle jerk party and do some actual research.

Posted by FearlessFreep
Baja Alabama
Member since Nov 2009
17333 posts
Posted on 2/8/18 at 10:19 am to
If HRC and Putin were so at odds, how do you explain this?
quote:

But the untold story behind that story is one that involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one.

At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.
quote:

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors.
quote:

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

Whether the donations played any role in the approval of the uranium deal is unknown. But the episode underscores the special ethical challenges presented by the Clinton Foundation, headed by a former president who relied heavily on foreign cash to accumulate $250 million in assets even as his wife helped steer American foreign policy as secretary of state, presiding over decisions with the potential to benefit the foundation’s donors.
Seems as though HRC and Putin didn't hate each other enough to do business together.
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
73548 posts
Posted on 2/8/18 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

This isn't even fricking debatable man. There are many quotes by Putin and Clinton. Get out of your crazy right-wing circle jerk party and do some actual research.
Posted by MMauler
Member since Jun 2013
19216 posts
Posted on 2/8/18 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

For example, in some precincts, United Russia had 99% of the vote. In others, more people voted for United Russia than total voters registered.


So you're saying that Russia is just like New Orleans and other Democrat strongholds?


I'm sure it's all just another "MISTAKE"
This post was edited on 2/8/18 at 4:12 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram