Started By
Message

re: Why should the U.S. be an enemy of modern day Russia?

Posted on 1/15/18 at 10:04 pm to
Posted by GoTig3rz1
Member since Nov 2017
92 posts
Posted on 1/15/18 at 10:04 pm to
quote:

how do you guys excuse that?



I think we excuse it with the complex thought of - just because someone opposes Trump - does not make them pro centrist-Democrat.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69492 posts
Posted on 1/15/18 at 10:05 pm to
quote:

Did I say anything positive about Obama's foreign policy or are you just changing the subject?


I am not changing the subject. It is the height of hypocrisy, imo, for a party to ATTACK a candidate in 2012 for being tough on russia and then turn around and blast the 2016 candidate for being too soft.

Why shouldn't Obama be chastised for short-sighted policy in the 2012 election regarding russia?
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
37668 posts
Posted on 1/15/18 at 10:06 pm to
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69492 posts
Posted on 1/15/18 at 10:07 pm to
quote:

I think we excuse it with the complex thought of - just because someone opposes Trump - does not make them pro centrist-Democrat.


You guys went after romney for being too tough on russia. Don't try to act like it didn't happen.

I have no doubt you supported Obama's russia talking points in 2012.

Part of being consistent is being equally outraged at different people.

You guys are angry at trump's soft russia policy, but you didn't do anything to fight Obama's soft russia policy.

That's hypocrisy.
Posted by GoTig3rz1
Member since Nov 2017
92 posts
Posted on 1/15/18 at 10:07 pm to
quote:

Why shouldn't Obama be chastised for short-sighted policy in the 2012 election regarding russia?



Go ahead - chastise him. It has nothing to do with 2018. and no one cares anyway.

Also, you're being wilfully ignorant by equating Obama's naivete with being in bed with Russia.
Posted by GoTig3rz1
Member since Nov 2017
92 posts
Posted on 1/15/18 at 10:09 pm to
quote:


You guys went after romney for being too tough on russia. Don't try to act like it didn't happen.

I have no doubt you supported Obama's russia talking points in 2012.

Part of being consistent is being equally outraged at different people.

You guys are angry at trump's soft russia policy, but you didn't do anything to fight Obama's soft russia policy.

That's hypocrisy.


I didn't support it and I don't know who "you guys" are. You're falling for the trap again.
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
22027 posts
Posted on 1/15/18 at 10:09 pm to
quote:

How many elections do they need to interfere with?


How many elections do we need to interfere with?

Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
36458 posts
Posted on 1/15/18 at 10:12 pm to
quote:

I bet Putin loves people like you.

The military-industrial complex loves interventionist Democrats like you. Just like the neocons, you always need a boogeyman to justify spending trillions of taxpayer dollars on weapons and proxy conflicts so that U.S. militarism can be exported to every corner of the planet.
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
9915 posts
Posted on 1/15/18 at 10:31 pm to
quote:

How many elections do we need to interfere with?


This doesn't matter to Putin. Russia doesn't have free and fair elections already and is threatened by any countries that do. Putin uses active measures to make the west look divided, corrupt, weak. He won't stop until it starts to cost him more than he gains.
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
22027 posts
Posted on 1/15/18 at 11:45 pm to
quote:

How many elections do we need to interfere with?


quote:

This doesn't matter to Putin. Russia doesn't have free and fair elections already and is threatened by any countries that do. Putin uses active measures to make the west look divided, corrupt, weak. He won't stop until it starts to cost him more than he gains.


Blah Blah Blah

We interfere with other governments elections worse than the Russians ever have.

Here are some cases where OBAMA directly interfered with another countries elections.

1) Obama, as a U.S. Senator, illegally used a taxpayer-financed trip to campaign for far-left presidential candidate Raila Odinga in Kenya’s 2006 elections.

2) During Israel’s 2015 elections, the Obama administration — led by Secretary of State John Kerry — illegally intervened when they attempted to defeat the reelection of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu by covertly funneling State Department grants to opposition groups.

3) Under the Obama administration the U.S. government has quietly spent millions of taxpayer dollars to destabilize the democratically elected, center-right government in Macedonia by colluding with leftwing, billionaire philanthropist George Soros.” Indeed, Obama’s ambassador to Macedonia, Jeff Baily, worked to funnel millions of dollars from the State Department and USAID to groups created by Soros which were, according to JW, working to overthrow the conservative government.

4) In 2011, Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, not only interfered politically in Libya but militarily as well, by orchestrating a series of policies designed to remove Muammar Gaddafi from power. While it would be a stretch to call Gaddafi a U.S. ally, he was cooperating with the U.S.A. in fighting Islamic extremists and had turned over all his WMDs to American officials.

5)Shortly after Obama was elected, leftist Honduran president Manual Zelaya attempted to illegally amend the Honduran Constitution so as to allow himself to serve as President longer than one term. Incredibly, Zelaya and a mob broke into a military installation where blank ballots were stored and tried to hold a constitutional referendum without the support of the election authorities. As a result, on orders from the Honduran Supreme Court, he was forcefully removed from office as Honduran law calls for.

Obama attacked Zelaya’s removal, falsely calling it a “coup d’état” and a WikiLeaks cable revealed that Obama backed Zelaya’s reinstatement in order to please Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez, who, like Fidel Castro, was an ally of Zelaya. Instead of supporting the right of Hondurans to remove their president for unconstitutional actions, Obama tried to pressure Honduras into reinstating Zelaya by freezing all non-humanitarian aid.


6) Like Libya, the Obama administration encouraged opposition to President Hosni Mubarak and intervened in elections to ensure that a radical Muslim Brotherhood leader, Mohammed Morsi, was elected president. Obama’s State Department even gave political training to MB leaders. Again, similar to Gadhafi, Mubarak was relatively secular and Egypt was becoming increasingly westernized. He was an ally of the U.S.A. and an opponent of radical jihadists.

And the Obama administration was open about its efforts. The Los Angeles Times reported that the “Obama administration said for the first time that it supports a role for groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
9915 posts
Posted on 1/15/18 at 11:51 pm to
I'm not sure I understand your position.

Would any of those countries be wrong to oppose the United States based on those examples (if true)?

Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
22027 posts
Posted on 1/16/18 at 12:24 am to
quote:

I'm not sure I understand your position.



My position is that when people keep crying about Russian meddling in our elections as an excuse to why they are our "enemy" It is ridiculous.


Also those listed US meddling in other country elections were/are all 100% true
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
9915 posts
Posted on 1/16/18 at 12:38 am to
It not only isn't ridiculous (any of those nations would have fair reason to proportionality retaliate against the US), but it really only scratches the surface for reasons why Russian is an American adversary. The chief reason is of course their repeated undermining of sovereignty of NATO nations, support of Assad and Hezbollah and Iran, seizing Crimea and the general fact that they consider themselves at war with the west and regularly use hacking, information ops, and subversion of democracy throughout the west as routine tactics.
This post was edited on 1/16/18 at 12:44 am
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
22710 posts
Posted on 1/16/18 at 12:41 am to
quote:

They are a military peer;

They are communist;

Their national government is a crime syndicate in suits.

Oh and that whole destruction of the West (thats us) mantra.


This thread will be a good expose on how little Trump supporters actually know about the world.





I know that two of those statements are moronic enough to raise the question of whether Fakeboy manages to get his shoes on the correct feet.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
263330 posts
Posted on 1/16/18 at 12:47 am to
quote:

Because Russia is actively engaged in a sustained effort to undercut American influence and power.


Maybe we should end much of our shitty foreign policy. Out power and influence = doing crappy shite or other countries
Posted by WW
Member since Dec 2013
2320 posts
Posted on 1/16/18 at 12:51 am to
quote:


Oh and that whole destruction of the West (thats us) mantra.


The eastern left?
Posted by AUsteriskPride
Albuquerque, NM
Member since Feb 2011
18385 posts
Posted on 1/16/18 at 12:52 am to
quote:

Hillary said so. Pretty much it.


But she didn't mean it, we all know that.
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
49166 posts
Posted on 1/16/18 at 3:32 am to
quote:

support of Assad



Versus what? Support of Al Qaeda offshoot radical wahhabists and even support of ISIS itself by the Kenyan dictator? Assad is/was 1000 times better for the region than the barbaric nuts the United States was arming and training halfway around the world in Russia’s backyard. It would be akin to Russia arming and training the narco cartels in Mexico in to fight the legitimate government of Mexico. Albeit Assad is probably much less corrupt that the Mexican government.
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
36458 posts
Posted on 1/16/18 at 7:09 am to
The union of progressive warmongers and neoconservatives is complete. Seriously, the anti-Russia liberals in this thread sound like Rumsfeld and Cheney in their zeal to protect and project U.S. militarism abroad.

The United States should have permanent interests, not permanent allies or enemies. All this fearmongering about a country being our mortal enemy for the foreseeable future does is make it easier for our politicians to drag us into wars that are nothing more than proxy conflicts that do nothing but get our soldiers killed and waste taxpayer money.
Posted by jptiger2009
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2009
9616 posts
Posted on 1/16/18 at 7:32 am to
quote:

Why should the U.S. be an enemy of modern day Russia? by GumboPot


POTUS says Russia is legit

first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram