- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU’s Lazy Rivers Tops Wall Street Journel’s Top Waste of 2017
Posted on 12/20/17 at 9:26 am to kengel2
Posted on 12/20/17 at 9:26 am to kengel2
quote:
It is awesome, doesn't mean it wasn't a waste of money though.
How is it a waste of money? Because it’s a lazy river rather than a lap pool? Or just having a pool at all is a waste?
The “upgrades” in 2006 included 5 computers for email stations, four flat screen TVs, and some lounge chairs. Almost no one got to utilize them because the building was constantly under repair. Depending on what year you went there, the weight room would be in the basketball courts, racquetball courts, or somewhere inbetween.
LSU admins finally had the sense to say “frick it” and do a total overhaul in two main phases, rather than piecemeal it together over 40 years. It’s laughable that spending hundreds of millions on specialty housing, dining, and facilities for athletes is reasonable, when they account for less than 5% of the student population (and 1/2 of 1% participate in revenue generating sports), but investing in facilities to attract and serve the other 95-99.995% is seen as “wasteful”.
TL;DR
It irritates me that some snotty count, who has never stepped foot on LSU’s campus, decides to chastise them for building a faculty/feature that serves the student body and will attract potential students.
This post was edited on 12/20/17 at 9:27 am
Posted on 12/20/17 at 9:53 am to logjamming
quote:
It’s laughable that spending hundreds of millions on specialty housing, dining, and facilities for athletes is reasonable, when they account for less than 5% of the student population (and 1/2 of 1% participate in revenue generating sports),
It is paid for by TAF and other private donations.
The REC was probably one of the worst facilities in the country for a "flagship university" The article is cherry picking with the lazy river and ignoring how bad the old facility used to be.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News