- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Even the left fears the sexual revolution might have gone too far
Posted on 12/10/17 at 8:20 pm to Revelator
Posted on 12/10/17 at 8:20 pm to Revelator
Imagine that. A biblical view of respect for others created in God's image and a biblical view of sex prevents and solves a lot of problems we experience with sex today.
Posted on 12/10/17 at 8:25 pm to FooManChoo
Oppressive sexual ideas from an ancient book will definitely solve "the problem".
Posted on 12/10/17 at 8:40 pm to Amazing Moves
quote:
Oppressive sexual ideas from an ancient book will definitely solve "the problem".
Even societies who didn't follow the Bible, practiced many of the same moral requirements mentioned in the Bible.
This post was edited on 12/10/17 at 8:56 pm
Posted on 12/10/17 at 9:06 pm to Amazing Moves
The notion that biblical sexuality is oppressive is what let loose the fires without regard to the things that would burn to the ground.
Keep sex within the confines of marriage and you will see a lot less poverty, single parenthood, STDs, sexual abuse, and abortion.
Keep sex within the confines of marriage and you will see a lot less poverty, single parenthood, STDs, sexual abuse, and abortion.
This post was edited on 12/10/17 at 9:43 pm
Posted on 12/10/17 at 9:08 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
Keep sex within the confides of marriage and you will see a lot less poverty, single parenthood, STDs, sexual abuse, and abortion.
He knows this is truth.
Posted on 12/10/17 at 9:08 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Democrats are becoming prudes.
Making a full circle.
They're on par with hardcore Evangelical when it comes to their puritanical ideology. They just have different gods.
Posted on 12/10/17 at 9:28 pm to FooManChoo
Because that's realistic in the animal kingdom.. That we so happen to be a part of despite your story book. Our natural instinct is to procreate with others. Natural attraction isn't mutually exclusive to one person. Which makes monogamy unnatural. At least for us.
Plus, not everyone has the mental capability to adhere to religion's made up requirements. Not to mention societies current standards.
That said, if you do choose to enter in a marriage you should remain faithful. Which is obvious but, it still doesn't make your instinct any different.
Plus, not everyone has the mental capability to adhere to religion's made up requirements. Not to mention societies current standards.
That said, if you do choose to enter in a marriage you should remain faithful. Which is obvious but, it still doesn't make your instinct any different.
Posted on 12/10/17 at 9:33 pm to Amazing Moves
An appeal to nature is not an effective argument. There are many, many attributes of civilization that are 'unnatural', yet arguably positive to the development of our species. We become better, I believe, when rising above base instinct.
Posted on 12/10/17 at 9:35 pm to HempHead
Well, good luck with this one.
Posted on 12/10/17 at 9:37 pm to Amazing Moves
It's impossible to enforce completely, obviously, but that isn't a justification for not trying at all.
Posted on 12/10/17 at 9:39 pm to HempHead
quote:
An appeal to nature is not an effective argument. There are many, many attributes of civilization that are 'unnatural', yet arguably positive to the development of our species. We become better, I believe, when rising above base instinct.
Sure, but completely rejecting base instinct never works out well either
Posted on 12/10/17 at 9:41 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
Sure, but completely rejecting base instinct never works out well either
That is definitely not what I'm suggesting. Human behavior is malleable, but only to a certain extent. I'm not smart enough to know what the sweet spot is.
Posted on 12/10/17 at 9:44 pm to HempHead
quote:
That is definitely not what I'm suggesting. Human behavior is malleable, but only to a certain extent. I'm not smart enough to know what the sweet spot is.
Base instinct is what drives human development. We've just been able to add to those developments via ever growing knowledge and technology. They're completely interwoven.
Posted on 12/10/17 at 9:51 pm to Revelator
Are these the same people who mocked VP Pence for being so old fashioned?
Posted on 12/10/17 at 9:54 pm to HempHead
quote:
I'm not smart enough to know what the sweet spot is.
I don't know either but it seems to be in an area where rules inspire people to reach beyond a base existence, while at the same time working with, not against, natural instincts.
Posted on 12/10/17 at 10:02 pm to Amazing Moves
quote:If you adhere to that worldview, then you have absolutely no basis for judging my "story book" in a negative light. There is no absolute, objective moral truth in your worldview and therefore there is no real "right" or "wrong" except what you decided inside your head. Why should I listen to your subjective standard if that's the case?
Because that's realistic in the animal kingdom.. That we so happen to be a part of despite your story book.
No, we are not part of the animal kingdom, and it's a good thing, too. We are made in the image of God and therefore have intrinsic value. If we were animals, we wouldn't have any value in ourselves and rape, theft, and murder against us would just be part of the harsh reality of nature.
quote:Yeah, and monogamous marriage allows a safe place for reproduction where the offspring have a better shot at a longer, more prosperous life.
Our natural instinct is to procreate with others.
I hope you don't condone rape, since animals screw each other with no regard for sexual autonomy in order to propagate their species.
quote:Monogamy is unnatural because humans find other humans attractive? Are you saying that I should be able to sleep with whoever I want (whether they want it or not, as happens in nature) if I find those other people attractive, because that's what is "natural"? As someone else said, there are a lot of things that happen in nature that I don't think we should be emulating.
Natural attraction isn't mutually exclusive to one person. Which makes monogamy unnatural. At least for us.
There are a lot of behaviors in humanity that seem to be natural that are self-destructive. We shouldn't support just anything people naturally want to do because you deem it unnatural. With this mentality, it's completely natural to kill sexual rivals who are preventing us from mating with those we want to.
What's natural is for us to sin. What's unnatural is for us to live rightly in accordance with God's perfect standard of righteousness. When we do what comes naturally, we suffer a lot because of it.
quote:Huh? Even if we assume all religious rules are "made up", that would go for all standards of morality. Should we punish people who don't have the "mental capability" to adhere to any sort of civilized moral structure?
Plus, not everyone has the mental capability to adhere to religion's made up requirements. Not to mention societies current standards.
quote:Why? You just said that it's unnatural. By your standard, we should be screwing anyone we want and damn the consequences because that's what cats and dogs do. What basis do you have to say that married people should remain faithful and why should anyone care about your standard?
That said, if you do choose to enter in a marriage you should remain faithful.
quote:Instinct might tell me to steal when I want something and kill when I'm angry. Why shouldn't I hunt you down and kill you in your sleep if that's what my instinct tells me to do?
Which is obvious but, it still doesn't make your instinct any different.
I'll tell you why I shouldn't. I have the moral law of God imprinted on me and I know that murder is objectively wrong and immoral, in spite of what you say about instinct and nature. I shouldn't do that because our society, though it spits in the face of God, borrows from His objective moral standard and recognizes an intrinsic value in humanity. This borrowed standard helps minimize pain and suffering in this life by providing recompense for those who would kill others with malice, though that is the "natural" thing to do.
This post was edited on 12/10/17 at 10:09 pm
Posted on 12/10/17 at 10:14 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
I'll tell you why I shouldn't. I have the moral law of God imprinted on me
Beautiful testimony. I'm sure he heard you. Now you get a check mark by your name. Congrats.
Posted on 12/10/17 at 10:18 pm to Amazing Moves
quote:I know it might be hard for you to believe, but I don't say these things to get check marks. The only good works that save anyone are the good works of Jesus Christ.
Beautiful testimony. I'm sure he heard you. Now you get a check mark by your name. Congrats.
This post was edited on 12/10/17 at 10:29 pm
Posted on 12/10/17 at 10:22 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
If you adhere to that worldview, then you have absolutely no basis for judging my "story book" in a negative light. There is no absolute, objective moral truth in your worldview and therefore there is no real "right" or "wrong" except what you decided inside your head. Why should I listen to your subjective standard if that's the case?
Boom! It amazes me how those that swear there are no moral absolutes, still want to enforce their view of morals.
This post was edited on 12/10/17 at 10:30 pm
Posted on 12/10/17 at 10:31 pm to Phil2012
quote:
Do you know who Gloria Steinem is/was?
Married a string of wealthy men while talking about being a liberated woman. Kind of a female John Kerry.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News