- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: To the Anti-trumps on this board
Posted on 12/10/17 at 10:56 am to Lsupimp
Posted on 12/10/17 at 10:56 am to Lsupimp
Get back to us when Progressives become so deranged with hate of a President as to claim that he hates America, is out to destroy America and all that is good in the world, and is in league with the fanatical terrorists who chop off heads and burn people alive.
Only then will Progressives have matched the Right's derangement over Obama.
heck, the Left has yet to even call Trump racist names or blame him for every crime committed by a white person.
Only then will Progressives have matched the Right's derangement over Obama.
heck, the Left has yet to even call Trump racist names or blame him for every crime committed by a white person.
Posted on 12/10/17 at 10:58 am to prplhze2000
quote:
You will wind up getting yourself worked up over and over again, more and more frustrated, and in the end, nothing will have changed.
Sounds like a bad case of "Blue State" Balls...
Posted on 12/10/17 at 10:58 am to Globetrotter747
quote:You may not like it, but it's effective.
I would rather just see him straighten up and stop acting like a 15 y/o on Twitter and elsewhere.
He doesn't let the media get away with lies without calling them out. Otherwise, no one calls them out on their lies.
It allows him to speak directly to people without the bullshite filter and bias of the media.
Posted on 12/10/17 at 10:59 am to MajorTaylor
quote:Never go full retard.
Many Liberals in the media think TOO HIGHLY of Conservatives in that they fail to see that many Conservatives don't care if Trump colluded with the Russians, don't care if Trump is racist, don't care if Trump is a religious bigot, don't care if Trump isn't much of a Christian himself, don't care if Trump sexually assaulted women, and don't care if Trump raped his ex-wife as she claims he did. As a result of being in their Liberal bubble, these media Liberals fail to see that for many Conservatives the cutting of taxes, the cutting of government waste, the removal of regulations that inhibit businesses, the address of illegal immigration, and the movement to keep Muslims out of America are ALL THAT MATTERS and nullify any concern over the other stuff.
Posted on 12/10/17 at 11:02 am to MajorTaylor
quote:
Only then will Progressives have matched the Right's derangement over Obama.
Posted on 12/10/17 at 11:06 am to Globetrotter747
quote:
acting like a 15 y/o on Twitter and elsewhere
I've watched as the media has taken conservative politicians to task over innuendo and half truths and wished they would fight back and set the record straight. Instead they acquiesced and paid the price.
Trump does not acquiesce and he's the better for it.
Posted on 12/10/17 at 11:07 am to MajorTaylor
People read your Fundamentalist Progressive screeds and they scoff . Which is why I hope you become a prolific poster here. The more you post , the more you discredit your own case . Example:
Barack Hussein Obama received a Nobel Peace Prize upon taking office . Donald J Trump got mass riots, pussy hats , celebrity death threats, Deep State coups, etc.
But please , by all means, keep spinning Fundamentalist Progressive narratives that make us chuckle .
Barack Hussein Obama received a Nobel Peace Prize upon taking office . Donald J Trump got mass riots, pussy hats , celebrity death threats, Deep State coups, etc.
But please , by all means, keep spinning Fundamentalist Progressive narratives that make us chuckle .
This post was edited on 12/10/17 at 11:09 am
Posted on 12/10/17 at 11:08 am to Pbhog
quote:
Benghazi
You think you have any clue what happened in Benghazi? Why they were even there in the first place? Why it was swept under the rug so fast? Remember when it happened, what was 2 months later?
If the truth about Benghazi was revealed all hell would break loose.
The investigation was just a dog and pony show to get people to stfu.
Posted on 12/10/17 at 11:11 am to MajorTaylor
He does hate America. Where has he been since leaving office? How many days has he spent in this country vs abroad?
He did destroy an entire region, his actions resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths and millions displaced from their homes in the ME.
He loosened nuclear restrictions on Iran, gave them pallets of cash, and allowed Russia to purchase and then truck Uranium from the US to Canada to who knows where.
ISIS didn't exist before him. ISIS thrived under his leadership. ISIS got btfo as soon as Trump and Mattis took over.
He did destroy an entire region, his actions resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths and millions displaced from their homes in the ME.
He loosened nuclear restrictions on Iran, gave them pallets of cash, and allowed Russia to purchase and then truck Uranium from the US to Canada to who knows where.
ISIS didn't exist before him. ISIS thrived under his leadership. ISIS got btfo as soon as Trump and Mattis took over.
Posted on 12/10/17 at 11:12 am to Jbird
I don't make habit of tracking the new posters here. Or, for that matter, the old posters.
I only observed the post count and tenure when it was brought up as attack against me. Most times I don't even look at the username of a post.
I only observed the post count and tenure when it was brought up as attack against me. Most times I don't even look at the username of a post.
Posted on 12/10/17 at 11:17 am to Lsupimp
Obama received a Nobel Peace prize from the Nobel Commission and at the same time he was characterized by the Right as Satan, as a terrorist, as an America-hater, as heralding the coming of the End Times, and called every racist name in the book.
The Right completely lost their shite over the election of Obama. And then, after blasting Obama for being a "celebrity" who was unqualified for the Presidency as a result of his limited experience in government and his not having served in the military, in a great act of utter hypocrisy the Right enthusiastically elected a celebrity who had zero experience in government and never served in the military.
The Right completely lost their shite over the election of Obama. And then, after blasting Obama for being a "celebrity" who was unqualified for the Presidency as a result of his limited experience in government and his not having served in the military, in a great act of utter hypocrisy the Right enthusiastically elected a celebrity who had zero experience in government and never served in the military.
Posted on 12/10/17 at 11:18 am to MajorTaylor
Ah yes the hard earned Nobel Peace Prize.
Posted on 12/10/17 at 11:21 am to prplhze2000
I understand the weariness with media wars and conspiracy theories, but these are not analogous situations.
First, let's look at the Clintons. The special prosecutor in that case was investigating shady deals going back to the 1970s in Arkansas. Even worse, the shady deals in question were the typical gray areas of ordinary political corruption where it's hard to prove with certainty that any quid-pro-quos took place. Was the Gingrich-led hysteria in Congress a little overboard? Yeah, but most Republicans were not focused on actually expecting anything to happen; rather, they just wanted people to stop bullshitting them into thinking Hillary got lucky on pork belly futures. It was just about "don't tell me that A is really B." That was it.
Really, it was the same way with the Clinton-Lewinsky thing. Most Republicans were more amused than vindictive, but there was some mild support for impeachment, just on the principle of "stop telling us that you didn't really lie because it 'depends on what the meaning of is, is.' "
In both cases, I might point out, what was alleged about the Clintons was absolutely true. No, not the stupid tabloid magazine bullshite about the Clintons murdering everybody--but about the Whitewater corruption and lying to investigators? Yeah. It was undeniably true.
Second, now let's look at Trump. This is not a matter of ordinary corruption. Is there some Clinton-style "gray area" corruption going on with getting national leaders to support his family's businesses? Yeah, but nobody really cares about that. The fundamental issue at stake is much more serious--i.e., (1) did Trump knowingly accept help from the Russian intelligence services during the 2016 primary and general election campaigns, (2) did he receive kickbacks or compensation from Putin-allied oligarchs for that, and (3) did he take overt actions in response to requests from the Russians in order to reciprocate the unreported help? I think the answer is undeniably "yes" to all three of those questions.
There will always be wild rumors and conspiracy theories on the fringes, like "Trump is really a Russian spy" or "Trump's campaign actively tried to hack election machines" or some other such crap, but let's be real here--that's not the real focus of the Mueller investigation.
Which brings up another point, which is that the Mueller investigation is qualitatively very very different from the Starr investigation. It actually has much more in common with the investigations of Nixon. Starr didn't start flipping close Clinton allies to report about serious issues related to cooperation with a foreign enemy; Mueller has.
You're in a fantasyland if you believe that the Mueller investigation isn't slowly building toward more serious problems for Trump month-by-month, week-by-week. It is. Anyone who thinks the Mueller investigation is floundering is a delusional follower of shady conservative media outlets.
First, let's look at the Clintons. The special prosecutor in that case was investigating shady deals going back to the 1970s in Arkansas. Even worse, the shady deals in question were the typical gray areas of ordinary political corruption where it's hard to prove with certainty that any quid-pro-quos took place. Was the Gingrich-led hysteria in Congress a little overboard? Yeah, but most Republicans were not focused on actually expecting anything to happen; rather, they just wanted people to stop bullshitting them into thinking Hillary got lucky on pork belly futures. It was just about "don't tell me that A is really B." That was it.
Really, it was the same way with the Clinton-Lewinsky thing. Most Republicans were more amused than vindictive, but there was some mild support for impeachment, just on the principle of "stop telling us that you didn't really lie because it 'depends on what the meaning of is, is.' "
In both cases, I might point out, what was alleged about the Clintons was absolutely true. No, not the stupid tabloid magazine bullshite about the Clintons murdering everybody--but about the Whitewater corruption and lying to investigators? Yeah. It was undeniably true.
Second, now let's look at Trump. This is not a matter of ordinary corruption. Is there some Clinton-style "gray area" corruption going on with getting national leaders to support his family's businesses? Yeah, but nobody really cares about that. The fundamental issue at stake is much more serious--i.e., (1) did Trump knowingly accept help from the Russian intelligence services during the 2016 primary and general election campaigns, (2) did he receive kickbacks or compensation from Putin-allied oligarchs for that, and (3) did he take overt actions in response to requests from the Russians in order to reciprocate the unreported help? I think the answer is undeniably "yes" to all three of those questions.
There will always be wild rumors and conspiracy theories on the fringes, like "Trump is really a Russian spy" or "Trump's campaign actively tried to hack election machines" or some other such crap, but let's be real here--that's not the real focus of the Mueller investigation.
Which brings up another point, which is that the Mueller investigation is qualitatively very very different from the Starr investigation. It actually has much more in common with the investigations of Nixon. Starr didn't start flipping close Clinton allies to report about serious issues related to cooperation with a foreign enemy; Mueller has.
You're in a fantasyland if you believe that the Mueller investigation isn't slowly building toward more serious problems for Trump month-by-month, week-by-week. It is. Anyone who thinks the Mueller investigation is floundering is a delusional follower of shady conservative media outlets.
Posted on 12/10/17 at 11:22 am to IllegalPete
quote:
ISIS didn't exist before him.
ISIL was founded in 1999 by Jordanian Salafi jihadist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi under the name Jama?at al-Taw?id wa-al-Jihad.
ISIL / ISIS began to collapse well before Trump took office.
Turn off Hannity and RW radio. It makes you dumb.
Posted on 12/10/17 at 11:23 am to Jbird
Are you ever anything but a taunting jackwad in your posts?
Posted on 12/10/17 at 11:24 am to prplhze2000
Hunting ain't no fun when the rabbit's got the gun.
Posted on 12/10/17 at 11:27 am to MajorTaylor
That folks, is how to obfuscate . The Progressive Fundamentalists have mastered it . They can swipe all the evidence away with nary a moment of contemplation. And then they just move right on with the next faulty premise . It’s how Fundamentalists think —if they point to your molehill it magically becomes their Mountain.
Posted on 12/10/17 at 11:28 am to Pbhog
quote:
Republicans spent 4 years 8 investigations and wasted about $20 million on Benghazi. Time for them to get a taste of their own medicine
I must have missed where President Trump being asleep at the wheel led to the deaths of an American Ambassador and 3 others. Wanna fill me in on that, Ace?
Posted on 12/10/17 at 11:31 am to MajorTaylor
quote:
the Left has yet to even call Trump racist names
Why bother when they call him racist?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News