Started By
Message
locked post

Historical basis for moving the US Embassy from Te Aviv to Jerusalem.

Posted on 12/7/17 at 9:11 am
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119027 posts
Posted on 12/7/17 at 9:11 am
Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995 lays out the historical context of the US initiative to locate the US Israel embassy in Jerusalem. Trump DID NOT make this decision in a vacuum. In fact under President Bill Clinton this law was adopted overwhelmingly by the Senate (93–5), and the House (374–37).

From the bill:


quote:

The Congress makes the following findings:

(1) Each sovereign nation, under international law and
custom, may designate its own capital.

(2) Since 1950, the city of Jerusalem has been the capital of the State of Israel.

(3) The city of Jerusalem is the seat of Israel’s President, Parliament, and Supreme Court, and the site of numerous government ministries and social and cultural institutions.

(4) The city of Jerusalem is the spiritual center of Judaism, and is also considered a holy city by the members of other religious faiths.

(5) From 1948–1967, Jerusalem was a divided city and
Israeli citizens of all faiths as well as Jewish citizens of all states were denied access to holy sites in the area controlled by Jordan.

(6) In 1967, the city of Jerusalem was reunited during
the conflict known as the Six Day War.

(7) Since 1967, Jerusalem has been a united city administered by Israel, and persons of all religious faiths have been guaranteed full access to holy sites within the city.

(8) This year marks the 28th consecutive year that Jerusalem has been administered as a unified city in which the rights of all faiths have been respected and protected.

(9) In 1990, the Congress unanimously adopted Senate
Concurrent Resolution 106, which declares that the Congress ‘‘strongly believes that Jerusalem must remain an undivided city in which the rights of every ethnic and religious group are protected’’.

(10) In 1992, the United States Senate and House of Representatives unanimously adopted Senate Concurrent Resolution 113 of the One Hundred Second Congress to commemorate the 25th anniversary of the reunification of Jerusalem, and reaffirming congressional sentiment that Jerusalem must remain an undivided city.

(11) The September 13, 1993, Declaration of Principles
on Interim Self-Government Arrangements lays out a timetable for the resolution of ‘‘final status’’ issues, including Jerusalem.

(12) The Agreement on the Gaza Strip and the Jericho Area was signed May 4, 1994, beginning the five-year transitional period laid out in the Declaration of Principles.

(13) In March of 1995, 93 members of the United States
Senate signed a letter to Secretary of State Warren Christopher encouraging ‘‘planning to begin now’’ for relocation of the United States Embassy to the city of Jerusalem.

(14) In June of 1993, 257 members of the United States
House of Representatives signed a letter to the Secretary of State Warren Christopher stating that the relocation of the United States Embassy to Jerusalem ‘‘should take place no later than . . . 1999’’.

(15) The United States maintains its embassy in the functioning capital of every country except in the case of our democratic friend and strategic ally, the State of Israel.

(16) The United States conducts official meetings and other business in the city of Jerusalem in de facto recognition of its status as the capital of Israel.

(17) In 1996, the State of Israel will celebrate the 3,000th anniversary of the Jewish presence in Jerusalem since King David’s entry.
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
99309 posts
Posted on 12/7/17 at 9:12 am to
They were for it before they were against it.
Posted by MrCarton
Paradise Valley, MT
Member since Dec 2009
20231 posts
Posted on 12/7/17 at 9:13 am to
Nobody gives a shite about this stuff.
This post was edited on 12/7/17 at 9:13 am
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51811 posts
Posted on 12/7/17 at 9:13 am to
But....muh feelings say we shouldn't move the embassy.
Posted by Gusoline
Jacksonville, NC
Member since Dec 2013
7657 posts
Posted on 12/7/17 at 9:13 am to
its a done deal so i have no idea why you all feel the need to continually discuss/justify/rally against it. nobody really gives a frick about it honestly.

cant wait to see 20 more threads on it today....
This post was edited on 12/7/17 at 9:14 am
Posted by Machine
Earth
Member since May 2011
6001 posts
Posted on 12/7/17 at 9:14 am to
if bill clinton was for it, it must be great?
Posted by Collegedropout
Where Northern Mexico meets Dixie
Member since May 2017
5202 posts
Posted on 12/7/17 at 9:16 am to
quote:

Senate (93–5), and the House (374–37).

Ignoring everything else about the situation, this alone tells me it was the wrong move
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram