- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Take the 14 year old out of the equation and assume just 16+
Posted on 11/13/17 at 7:42 pm
Posted on 11/13/17 at 7:42 pm
In your opinion if the girl is over the legal age of consent at the time (assume Still in high school though) and the other party is in their 30’s is it no harm no foul? Not legally, but morally do you see anything wrong with that or is it simply none of our business.
This post was edited on 11/13/17 at 7:45 pm
18
Posted on 11/13/17 at 7:43 pm to DavidTheGnome
Well, let’s just pretend she was 30 instead of 14, and pretend it was all right. That’s what we will do.
Posted on 11/13/17 at 7:44 pm to DavidTheGnome
If you believe that he shoved her face towards his dick, no, I thinks it’s both harm and foul, and he should go to jail to get assraped. If you think he was just dating her, it is creepy but not illegal.
This post was edited on 11/13/17 at 8:07 pm
Posted on 11/13/17 at 7:44 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
by DavidTheGnome
In your opinion if the girl is over the legal age of consent at the time and the other party is in their 30’s is it no harm no foul? Not legally, but morally do you see anything wrong with that or is it simply none of our business.
Let's say you consider it bad.
Do you consider it "We'll hold it against you for 40 years" bad?
Using your hypothetical of course
Posted on 11/13/17 at 7:45 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
Do you consider it "We'll hold it against you for 40 years" bad?
That’s a good question. Should the past just be the past and we move on or is this still an issue?
This post was edited on 11/13/17 at 7:46 pm
Posted on 11/13/17 at 7:45 pm to DavidTheGnome
As long as it's consensual and both are legal age (16 in Bama), who am I to judge. That's what the left has been telling me for years.
Posted on 11/13/17 at 7:45 pm to DavidTheGnome
What if it was your daughter?
Posted on 11/13/17 at 7:46 pm to DavidTheGnome
If the 2 people are of legal age who are we to say anything. Let them do what they want. I have no issue with that
Posted on 11/13/17 at 7:46 pm to DavidTheGnome
Honestly I don't think our elected officials should be fornicating. I would rather be ruled over by asexual reptile creatures wearing human skin
Oh wait... I already am
Oh wait... I already am
Posted on 11/13/17 at 7:46 pm to DavidTheGnome
As long as it’s legal, I don’t care who they sleep with. I want them to vote for the things that I sent them there to vote for. If this stuff were true about Roy Moore, he still wouldn’t be more of a scumbag than McCain and McConnell.
Posted on 11/13/17 at 7:47 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
That’s a good question
I mean. If legal but questionable sexual choices (note, the legal girls say no sex was involved)...... But still...... If legal but questionable choices are "hold it against you 40 years" shite......
Well. Let's just say i don't think there are a lot of people who can pick up stones in that glass house
Posted on 11/13/17 at 7:51 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
That’s a good question. Should the past just be the past and we move on or is this still an issue?
Well. I sure hope that I'm not ruined for 40 year old legal shite.
I think i speak for pretty much everyone on that.
Ya know. Except for the saints among us
Posted on 11/13/17 at 7:52 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:I would have trouble with the high school inviting a 33 year old creeper in to talk to the civics class. It really isn't acceptable for a guy that age to be hitting on high school chicks.
In your opinion if the girl is over the legal age of consent at the time (assume Still in high school though) and the other party is in their 30’s is it no harm no foul? Not legally, but morally do you see anything wrong with that or is it simply none of our business.
Posted on 11/13/17 at 7:54 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
In your opinion if the girl is over the legal age of consent at the time (assume Still in high school though) and the other party is in their 30’s is it no harm no foul?
If you had a 16 to 18 year old daughter and a grown arse 32 year old man is coming on to them, wanting to date them, what would you do?
Posted on 11/13/17 at 7:55 pm to DavidTheGnome
As a Dad, I wouldn’t want my 16 year old daughter hanging around 30 year old men.
But would I judge a person off these decisions that were legal at the time, and even perhaps the norm, 40 years later?
No. No, I would not.
But would I judge a person off these decisions that were legal at the time, and even perhaps the norm, 40 years later?
No. No, I would not.
Posted on 11/13/17 at 7:55 pm to ShortyRob
That’s fair, everyone has some sort of skeletons in their closet. There’s no such thing as a perfect politician. Does being 30+ out hitting on high school girls cross a certain line though, and if so can enough time elapse to where the past becomes the past?
Posted on 11/13/17 at 7:56 pm to DavidTheGnome
I think it is morally wrong for a 30 year old man to sleep with a 16 year old girl yes.
Posted on 11/13/17 at 7:58 pm to DavidTheGnome
There is something wrong with a 35 year old man chasing 16 y/o waitresses. It may not be illegal. It’s strange AF. And no, if you did that and want to be a public figure US senator, I don’t feel the least bit sorry for you if it bites you in the arse.
I’d say the same thing for an R, a D, an I, or and L.
It frankly sickens me that the same church that has been screaming about sexual morality is willing to ignore all that when one of their own is implicated. It’s one big reason I am no longer an evangelical. I had this funny notion that evangelicals believed Jesus. Shame on me.
I’d say the same thing for an R, a D, an I, or and L.
It frankly sickens me that the same church that has been screaming about sexual morality is willing to ignore all that when one of their own is implicated. It’s one big reason I am no longer an evangelical. I had this funny notion that evangelicals believed Jesus. Shame on me.
This post was edited on 11/13/17 at 7:59 pm
Posted on 11/13/17 at 7:59 pm to Salmon
quote:
As a Dad, I wouldn’t want my 16 year old daughter hanging around 30 year old men. But would I judge a person off these decisions that were legal at the time, and even perhaps the norm, 40 years later? No. No, I would not.
As a dad I would have huge issues with a 30+ year old hitting on my teenage daughter even if she were 18. And I would judge the frick out of them, especially if she were still in high school. To me that’s a moral line crossed even if technically legal.
Posted on 11/13/17 at 7:59 pm to el Gaucho
quote:
I would rather be ruled over by asexual reptile creatures wearing human skin
Archonic shapeshifting Draconian lizard overlords. This is what we really should be discussing. Not a 30 year old screwing an 18 year old.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News