- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Cheapest "Beater" Shotgun
Posted on 10/13/17 at 8:23 am to fishfighter
Posted on 10/13/17 at 8:23 am to fishfighter
OP said he wanted it to be able to shoot 3.5's. Therefore, I agree that the 835 is what he wants.
However, if he does want the ability to shoot slugs, which he asked about later in the thread, then he'd need a dedicated slug barrel for the 835 or a gun that is not overbored. Also, take a look at a 535 which is basically a 500 with a 3.5" chamber.
However, if he does want the ability to shoot slugs, which he asked about later in the thread, then he'd need a dedicated slug barrel for the 835 or a gun that is not overbored. Also, take a look at a 535 which is basically a 500 with a 3.5" chamber.
Posted on 10/13/17 at 8:28 am to Homey the Clown
have bought two 870s express models that shoot 3.5 have never had an issue all purchased within the last 5 years. i use the heck out of them from deer hunting to shooting clays. Barrels get cleaned once a year. Not one problem.
Posted on 10/13/17 at 10:08 am to Bigwhite5154
I've owned two 870s. Both were manufactured over 15 years ago. The older one I had began having trouble ejecting spent shells, so I sold it to a gunshop. The other one I had shot 3.5" shells, and I never had a problem with that one (other than a bruise on my shoulder for a week and a half after my first goose hunt with it ). I sold the second one to buy my semiauto.
The thing is, I've read a lot about the quality going way down in the recent years. I haven't found nearly as much negative stories from Nova owners. As a matter of fact, the only negative reviews I've read about the Nova are mostly about the look, bulkiness, or the forearm rattling. Nothing really about it malfunctioning in the field. I also know two hardcore waterfowl hunters who, for the life of them, will not give up their Nova for any other shotgun. Remington still produces a solid gun in the 870, but it seems like there is a higher chance you get a "lemon" with Remington, rather than Benelli.
Based on that, I decided to go with the Nova. Sure I could have saved $50 and got an 870 and crossed my fingers that I didn't get a lemon, but I didn't.
Also, I'm such a compulsive buyer, I wanted the gun right then and there, and neither Academy in town had anything other than wood stock 870s, but one of the stores had one black synthetic Nova in stock, which is what I wanted, so I pulled the trigger. Pun intended.
The thing is, I've read a lot about the quality going way down in the recent years. I haven't found nearly as much negative stories from Nova owners. As a matter of fact, the only negative reviews I've read about the Nova are mostly about the look, bulkiness, or the forearm rattling. Nothing really about it malfunctioning in the field. I also know two hardcore waterfowl hunters who, for the life of them, will not give up their Nova for any other shotgun. Remington still produces a solid gun in the 870, but it seems like there is a higher chance you get a "lemon" with Remington, rather than Benelli.
Based on that, I decided to go with the Nova. Sure I could have saved $50 and got an 870 and crossed my fingers that I didn't get a lemon, but I didn't.
Also, I'm such a compulsive buyer, I wanted the gun right then and there, and neither Academy in town had anything other than wood stock 870s, but one of the stores had one black synthetic Nova in stock, which is what I wanted, so I pulled the trigger. Pun intended.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News