- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Journalists and punidts on twitter claiming 600k women just lost birth control
Posted on 10/6/17 at 1:35 pm to MrLarson
Posted on 10/6/17 at 1:35 pm to MrLarson
And that didn't take long.
quote:
Fox News?Verified account @FoxNews 2m2 minutes ago
ACLU files suit against Trump admin after rollback of ObamaCare contraceptive mandate - via @brookefoxnews
Posted on 10/6/17 at 1:38 pm to MrLarson
quote:
ACLU files suit against
So, a woman has a right to government supplied birth control?
I wonder where that is covered in the Constitution...
Posted on 10/6/17 at 1:44 pm to The Maj
quote:
So, a woman has a right to government supplied birth control?
I wonder where that is covered in the Constitution...
The Supremacy Clause, duh!
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconbooboo.gif)
Posted on 10/6/17 at 1:48 pm to GeorgePaton
quote:
Hoorah! We don't need no birth control.
No birth control? Where'd you get that silly idea from?
The rest of your post is too stupid and inane to warrant further comment.
Posted on 10/6/17 at 3:23 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Why do people disregard the cheap, easily attained, and effective condom?
Posted on 10/6/17 at 4:04 pm to teke184
quote:
They lost the ability to pay $10 at Target?
All women would have to do is skip getting a fancy hairdo one time when they normally would get one and that would pay for plenty of condoms.
Posted on 10/6/17 at 4:15 pm to drunkenpunkin
I'm going to play devil's advocate
If it is against the first amendment to mandate that a boss pay for contraceptives, then why isn't it against the first amendment that Christian tax payers have to pay for wars, executions, etc?
If it is against the first amendment to mandate that a boss pay for contraceptives, then why isn't it against the first amendment that Christian tax payers have to pay for wars, executions, etc?
Posted on 10/6/17 at 4:17 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
Go buy birth control or use a condom.
Hell, women don't ever have to pay for their own birth control or for condoms. all women have to do is make the guy they are spreading their legs for pay for the birth control or condom.
If the man won't then no ticky, no washy.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconPimp.gif)
Posted on 10/6/17 at 4:49 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
As an employer, I’d rather have female employees on the pill than frequently pregnant and taking time off.
Not to mention the constant clucking for nine months to other employees about the status of the pregnancies and their personal birth plans yada yada yada. Avoiding that alone is worth the cost IMO.
Not to mention the constant clucking for nine months to other employees about the status of the pregnancies and their personal birth plans yada yada yada. Avoiding that alone is worth the cost IMO.
Posted on 10/6/17 at 5:06 pm to Blob Fish
quote:
As an employer, I’d rather have female employees on the pill than frequently pregnant and taking time off.
Well... Then keep including it in your plan.
This just removed the mandate requiring employers to offer it.
I have a problem with employers requiring to offer insurance int he first place but thats an entirely different talk
Posted on 10/6/17 at 5:12 pm to Blob Fish
quote:
As an employer, I’d rather have female employees on the pill than frequently pregnant and taking time off.
Not to mention the constant clucking for nine months to other employees about the status of the pregnancies and their personal birth plans yada yada yada. Avoiding that alone is worth the cost IMO.
Here in SF, about 8 months ago the local ABC morning news program hired a hot, sexy weatherwoman and she immediately got pregnant. The last two months her belly has gotten so big that when she turns sideways and points to the weather map she blocks the weather map so you can't see it.
All you can do is stare at her big belly and hope that her water doesn't break during the weather report.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/icons/surprised.gif)
Posted on 10/6/17 at 5:14 pm to The Maj
quote:
So, a woman has a right to government supplied birth control?
I wonder where that is covered in the Constitution...
Where can I get my free condoms?
Posted on 10/6/17 at 5:17 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Women who fall for this and other dem-prog lies embarrass me.
Posted on 10/6/17 at 5:20 pm to Crimson Wraith
quote:
Where can I get my free condoms?
Prostitutes will give you a free condom before they provide you with their "service".
Posted on 10/6/17 at 5:22 pm to UFMatt
quote:
The best birth control is free, keep your legs together.
Yeah, because that advice has served Mississippi so well being #1 in teen pregnancy for over a decade.
Posted on 10/6/17 at 5:22 pm to RogerTheShrubber
![](https://i64.tinypic.com/2rpwn09.jpg)
Having sex with this bitch is a hate crime and an injustice to modern day society.
Posted on 10/6/17 at 5:24 pm to LSU Patrick
quote:
Or even use their own money (gasp) to purchase methods of preventing the natural consequences of their elective behaviors.
You do know that once these single mothers get pregnant, that their offspring often cost us millions to control. I am for a vast expansion of birth control, and everyone with a remotely functioning brain knows this is far cheaper in the long run.
Plus this prevents abortion. What side is the GOP? Anti-abortion or anti-birth control pills? Which is worse for y'all?
This post was edited on 10/6/17 at 5:26 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)