- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Cleveland police refuse to participate in Browns’ national anthem
Posted on 9/3/17 at 10:15 am to Barneyrb
Posted on 9/3/17 at 10:15 am to Barneyrb
quote:
Because they are nothing more than entertainers now, I think it's a crying shame that they make (up to) several million dollars a year while the scientist trying to cure cancer or some other disease will only make $1-200K (if that).
1. I'd imagine the average scientist makes more than the average player in their scientist and football careers.
2. Who do you think should receive the billions of revenue dollars. If not the players?
There's no crying shame, this is simple economics.
2
Posted on 9/3/17 at 12:22 pm to shel311
quote:
1. I'd imagine the average scientist makes more than the average player in their scientist and football careers.
I imagine the average construction worker has more assets in 5 years than the average guy in the NFL. Athletes are notoriously terrible with money.
Posted on 9/3/17 at 12:40 pm to shel311
quote:
1. I'd imagine the average scientist makes more than the average player in their scientist and football careers
The average football player only has to work two seasons to blow out the lifetime earnings of an average scientist, possibly only one depending on how you define "scientist."
The only difference is that as someone else meationed, one party is likely to far more intelligently manage their assets than the other.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News