Catholic bishops call new immigration bill "discriminatory" and contrary to US tradition

It's DOA in the Senate unless they bump that number up. Now if the 3D chess guys are right and this is just an opening gambit to get us to a points system and they negotiate away the lower limit I will unironically, no bamboozle, praise Trump. But I doubt it is, you don't hire Sessions and Bannon and Miller because you like legal immigration.

Hopefully when this doesnt pass cause of Miss Lindsey everyone will be woke about whats going on

Prior to 1965, the U.S. immigration law was clear that only whites from Northern Europe were allowed to immigrate. In the early 20th century, there was a lot of gnashing of teeth about the Italians and Eastern Europeans (especially Jews) because a lot of people didn't think they should qualify as white. But the law had been changed (in the 20's I think) to allow them.

For this Mexican "Bishop" to sit there and say that America has "always welcomed all comers" is simply false. It's a myth that is perpetrated today without any basis in reality. Non-white immigration only started in any significant way in 1965 thanks to the Hart-Cellar Act. 1965 wasn't that long ago -- many people posting here were born prior to 1965.

Your title is wrong. It is one bishop not bishops

F u Anglo Saxon trash that settled Louisiana w/out French or Spanish permission. Ya'll think ya'll so privileged when ya'll came from squatter scum. You come from heretic religions founded by illiterate hillbillies- like the southern baptists.

frick them. I know we'd have to get in line..., but frick them.

quote:

---

Ya'll think ya'll so privileged when ya'll came from squatter scum. You come from heretic religions founded by illiterate hillbillies- like the southern baptists.

---

At least we didn't come from somewhere that people still squat and shite on the ground, are heathens from the heart of darkness and are still too stupid to know how to dig a hole to drill for water.

As a Catholic, Bishops, Cardinals and Pope should not be involved in politics that involve putting at risk people of a home country by undermining policies that are instituted to protect. Thus, undermining that home country's ability to exist, earn wages and build capital. These things allow a great nation such as the U.S.to do the things it has done for a long time to defend and share with other peoples in need. Not to allow the destruction of that same society and capital by allowing every single human that wants a piece of the tit to partake. Otherwise, it will run dry and self-destruct.

A fairly easy concept of reality without being anti-anything.

frick 'em.