- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Seattle stops funding UW research term that found harmful effect of 15/hr minimum wage
Posted on 7/20/17 at 2:21 am
Posted on 7/20/17 at 2:21 am
and reappropriates funding to Cal Berkeley economist who found more favorable results
For a party that prides itself on being "data driven" and "pro science", it seems to want to stick its fingers in its ears on this particular issue.
Last month, a group of scholars commissioned by the city of Seattle to study the effects of hiking the minimum wage struck a blow at the national “fight for 15” movement.
Their findings, which were widely covered in the media, showed that Seattle’s $13 minimum wage — part of a gradual increase to $15 — had all the negative effects that opponents of the policy feared. Low-wage employees had their hours cut by 3.5 million in a single quarter, costing more than $120 million in lost wages. The average worker lost $1,500 of income per year, hardly something those struggling to support themselves or their families could afford.
When faced with this data, even left-leaning publications such as Slate questioned whether the “fight for 15” had gone too far and was hurting those it was intended to help. So what did the Seattle City Council do? They killed the messengers and stuck their head in the sand.
It turns out that Seattle stopped funding the University of Washington research team led by Jacob Vigdor last fall, after the council had seen preliminary results. (The contract was supposed to run for five years, but it relied on annual appropriations for funding.) Their replacement? Berkeley economics professor Michael Reich, whose research coincidentally shows that minimum-wage increases help low-income workers.
I find it somewhat horrifying that an actual member of the socialist internationale party is a major council leader of one of our major western cities. How did THAT happen?
For a party that prides itself on being "data driven" and "pro science", it seems to want to stick its fingers in its ears on this particular issue.
Last month, a group of scholars commissioned by the city of Seattle to study the effects of hiking the minimum wage struck a blow at the national “fight for 15” movement.
Their findings, which were widely covered in the media, showed that Seattle’s $13 minimum wage — part of a gradual increase to $15 — had all the negative effects that opponents of the policy feared. Low-wage employees had their hours cut by 3.5 million in a single quarter, costing more than $120 million in lost wages. The average worker lost $1,500 of income per year, hardly something those struggling to support themselves or their families could afford.
When faced with this data, even left-leaning publications such as Slate questioned whether the “fight for 15” had gone too far and was hurting those it was intended to help. So what did the Seattle City Council do? They killed the messengers and stuck their head in the sand.
It turns out that Seattle stopped funding the University of Washington research team led by Jacob Vigdor last fall, after the council had seen preliminary results. (The contract was supposed to run for five years, but it relied on annual appropriations for funding.) Their replacement? Berkeley economics professor Michael Reich, whose research coincidentally shows that minimum-wage increases help low-income workers.
quote:
While human bias and cognitive dissonance are nothing new, the council’s blatant disregard for any viewpoint or data that contradict their preconceived worldview is astounding. But should it be? Studies have shown time and time again that a lack of ideological diversity leads to groupthink. And groupthink is prominently on display in Seattle.
quote:
City-council member and avowed socialist Kshama Sawant, for example, once assured attendees at a council meeting that she had no Republican friends — to rapturous applause from the liberal crowd. She also defended the council’s moves regarding the minimum-wage study, saying, “The moment we saw it was based on flawed methodology and was going to be unreliable, the Vigdor study no longer speaks for City Hall.”
I find it somewhat horrifying that an actual member of the socialist internationale party is a major council leader of one of our major western cities. How did THAT happen?
Posted on 7/20/17 at 2:28 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
City-council member and avowed socialist Kshama Sawant
quote:
Kshama Sawant
quote:
Sawant
quote:
awant
quote:
a want
BUSTED!!!
This post was edited on 7/20/17 at 2:29 am
Posted on 7/20/17 at 3:10 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
This is how the "science" of man-made global warming was settled.
Posted on 7/20/17 at 7:00 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Good, why should they continue? They now know the results Will be dismissed as "bad science" however
Posted on 7/20/17 at 7:01 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Thank goodness this is isolated behavior. Liberals would never do the same with a matter of global significance.
Posted on 7/20/17 at 7:41 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
“The moment we saw it was based on flawed methodology and was going to be unreliable, the Vigdor study no longer speaks for City Hall.”
Right, it's definitely best to give that job to an actual advocacy group instead
Posted on 7/20/17 at 7:53 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
The left approaches science in roughly the same manner that young Earth creation scientists approach it.
That's why when they call themselves The Party of science it's such a comedy
That's why when they call themselves The Party of science it's such a comedy
Posted on 7/20/17 at 7:54 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
You mean liberal policies tend to hurt the economy? But it makes them feel good about themselves, so screw your research.
This post was edited on 7/20/17 at 7:55 am
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:10 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
This is the same thing they do to global warming scientists. You only hear about studies showing global warming because those are the groups the government funds. They don't fund or promote the groups who say the books are cooked.
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:15 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
The party of science
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:20 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Looking at the research showed a elasticity of labor demand of 3. That's pretty elastic and should let Seattle know that their move to $13/hr was dumb.
HHM, this goes back to the question you asked the other day.
HHM, this goes back to the question you asked the other day.
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:22 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
lol at low IQs
funding was stopped because ALL the other studies found the opposite and this one had poor methodology
funding was stopped because ALL the other studies found the opposite and this one had poor methodology
Posted on 7/20/17 at 7:49 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
I thought liberals liked science?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News