- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Doesn't the Trump, Jr. meeting prove that the Trump campaign WAS NOT "colluding" ....
Posted on 7/12/17 at 11:18 am
Posted on 7/12/17 at 11:18 am
with the Russians?
If Trump was colluding with the Russians then he would have had someone on the inside who he could have discussed this woman with and could have easily have figured out that this woman was not working on behalf of the Russian government and had nothing to offer with respect to "dirt" on sHitlary. This would have all been done before any meeting.
I mean, if you are seriously colluding with the Russians, wouldn't Trump had called his "point man" and asked who this woman is and why is she calling "outside the chain of command"?
If Trump was colluding with the Russians then he would have had someone on the inside who he could have discussed this woman with and could have easily have figured out that this woman was not working on behalf of the Russian government and had nothing to offer with respect to "dirt" on sHitlary. This would have all been done before any meeting.
I mean, if you are seriously colluding with the Russians, wouldn't Trump had called his "point man" and asked who this woman is and why is she calling "outside the chain of command"?
This post was edited on 7/12/17 at 11:20 am
11
Posted on 7/12/17 at 11:27 am to MMauler
This question is the difference between the majority of conservatives vs. the majority of liberals.
This is a logical question. And, every time it is posed, the liberals run from it because they truly didn't realize it and because they think they are winning on the issue anyway.
This is a logical question. And, every time it is posed, the liberals run from it because they truly didn't realize it and because they think they are winning on the issue anyway.
Posted on 7/12/17 at 11:30 am to MMauler
That takes a couple layers of thought.
The "SQUIRREL!" Approach Is easier..
The "SQUIRREL!" Approach Is easier..
Posted on 7/12/17 at 11:31 am to MMauler
Posted on 7/12/17 at 11:33 am to MMauler
Maybe. So that just leaves Jr being stupid and gullible as hell, and a bald faced liar. 
Posted on 7/12/17 at 11:36 am to MMauler
Potentially conspiracy to collude, which seems like a massive stretch. The only thing I've heard that possibly has any weight to it was on NPR this morning when they were saying it might be a foreign campaign contribution. Frankly I'd love to see that can of worms opened.
Posted on 7/12/17 at 11:37 am to MMauler
quote:
If Trump was colluding with the Russians then he would have had someone on the inside who he could have discussed this woman with and could have easily have figured out that this woman was not working on behalf of the Russian government and had nothing to offer with respect to "dirt" on sHitlary. This would have all been done before any meeting.
I mean, if you are seriously colluding with the Russians, wouldn't Trump had called his "point man" and asked who this woman is and why is she calling "outside the chain of command"?
desperation?
Posted on 7/12/17 at 11:39 am to MMauler
quote:you mean like his presidential campaign manager or something?
If Trump was colluding with the Russians then he would have had someone on the inside
because, yes, Paul Manafort was also at the meeting, along with Jared Kushner.
great job at disproving your own point.
This post was edited on 7/12/17 at 11:40 am
Posted on 7/12/17 at 11:41 am to MMauler
quote:
Doesn't the Trump, Jr. meeting prove that the Trump campaign WAS NOT "colluding" ....
No, it proves they were.
Posted on 7/12/17 at 11:43 am to MMauler
quote:Reasoning backwards from the assumption that Trump always does things competently is pretty fraught.
If Trump was colluding with the Russians then he would have had someone on the inside who he could have discussed this woman with and could have easily have figured out that this woman was not working on behalf of the Russian government and had nothing to offer with respect to "dirt" on sHitlary. This would have all been done before any meeting.
Posted on 7/12/17 at 12:07 pm to MMauler
quote:
If Trump was colluding with the Russians then he would have had someone on the inside who he could have discussed this woman with and could have easily have figured out that this woman was not working on behalf of the Russian government and had nothing to offer with respect to "dirt" on sHitlary. This would have all been done before any meeting.
Pretty retarded conclusion there bro. And you getting so mad about people pointing it out!
It does not "prove" anything either way. Trump admin collusion could have been much more loosely coupled than you are alluding too and most likely would be given the prospect of being surveilled by the NSA. You act as though collusion means a fricking bat phone between Putin and Trump.
TRY AGAIN BITCH
Posted on 7/12/17 at 12:10 pm to MMauler
Yes. Looks like a dead end.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News