- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Did the Supreme Court leave itself open to litigation?
Posted on 6/26/17 at 5:00 pm
Posted on 6/26/17 at 5:00 pm
they mentioned that nobody without direct ties to U.S. residents would be allowed in, but that seems vague as to what constitutes a direct tie
15
Posted on 6/26/17 at 5:01 pm to hsfolk
You do know the Supreme Court cannot be sued?
Posted on 6/26/17 at 5:01 pm to hsfolk
Dafuq?
Posted on 6/26/17 at 5:02 pm to hsfolk
First order relative...
Posted on 6/26/17 at 5:02 pm to hsfolk
They listed out some examples of what a direct tie will look like.
In the end this will be a moot question anyway because before all of this can be figured out the Executive Order will expire and new travels guidelines will be instituted by the proper departments.
In the end this will be a moot question anyway because before all of this can be figured out the Executive Order will expire and new travels guidelines will be instituted by the proper departments.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 5:02 pm to hsfolk
I'm sure the Muslim Brotherhood is drafting the case now. The are hopeful their case versus the USSC will be in a Sharia Court.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 5:02 pm to hsfolk
That's not what they said at all. And their ruling was specifically regarding Trump's EO.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 5:03 pm to hsfolk
quote:
Did the Supreme Court leave itself open to litigation?
Posted on 6/26/17 at 5:03 pm to hsfolk
Nah, but the ruling's interpretation will probably be challenged when someone gets stopped from boarding a plane and phone's back to the US. Other judges will have to fight that battle.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 5:03 pm to hsfolk
quote:
ban on visitors from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen can be enforced if those visitors lack a "credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States."
Seems pretty straight forward
Posted on 6/26/17 at 5:03 pm to hsfolk
While SCOTUS gave guidance, yes, there is some ambiguity. But no, SCOTUS is never "open to litigation".
Posted on 6/26/17 at 5:13 pm to hsfolk
quote:
they mentioned that nobody without direct ties to U.S. residents would be allowed in, but that seems vague as to what constitutes a direct tie
Supreme Court.
Supreme.
SUPREME.
SUPREME.
SUPREME.
I hope this clarifies the answer for you.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 5:14 pm to hsfolk
quote:
they mentioned that nobody without direct ties to U.S. residents would be allowed in, but that seems vague as to what constitutes a direct tie
Did you read the ruling? They did spell it out in detail, examples are
quote:
If U.S. citizens claim close relatives from one of the targeted countries, they will be able to do so.
If U.S. universities have accepted students from one of the targeted countries, the students will be able to enter the U.S. and start their studies.
If a U.S. business has given a job to a worker from one of the targeted countries, the worker will be able to do that job.
Posted on 6/26/17 at 5:17 pm to hsfolk
Maybe to the Ultimate Supreme Court?
Or
The Secret Top Supreme Court?
Or
The Tip Top Supreme Court?
Or
The Secret Top Supreme Court?
Or
The Tip Top Supreme Court?
Posted on 6/26/17 at 5:25 pm to hsfolk
Wut?
Posted on 6/26/17 at 5:31 pm to hsfolk
I downvoted you for just being plain stupid. Seriously read up on how the government works.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News