Started By
Message

re: DAT 5/17: Astros (McCullers) @ Marlins (Urena), 11:10 CDT

Posted on 5/17/17 at 9:19 pm to
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
32251 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 9:19 pm to
quote:

I don't want Bregman traded.

My point is no one should say Tucker is untouchable and expect a TOR starter

Bregman would have got that deal done this summer

And in retrospect, who is more expendable?

Nobody knows the answer to that, but I enjoy the discussion.



More expendable between Tucker and Bregman?

Its Tucker of course. Bregman destroyed the minors too+he has proven to be a league average player. Even if he never proves more than that we know 100% that he is an average player and is CURRENTLY contributing to a playoff contending team. Tucker MAY be the truth and by all means appears to be. However hes still a couple years away from providing any major league at bats much less hitting .260
This post was edited on 5/17/17 at 9:19 pm
Posted by wahoocs
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2004
22411 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 9:26 pm to
The average 3rd baseman in MLB hits 4 HRs w 48 RBIs hitting .250?

I think Marwin and Yuli could muster that.

It's not my wish to bash Bregman. He's on the fast track to being a 10 year starter in the Show. I almost drove to Houston to get a replica jersey the other night.

But a spades a spade when we're talking about winning the WS this year.
Posted by wahoocs
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2004
22411 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 9:30 pm to
Unfortunately, I don't think a deal can get done for Cole, Archer, or Quintana w/o Tucker.
Posted by Jwho77
cyperspace
Member since Sep 2003
76806 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 9:31 pm to
It can with Martes, F. Perez and Fisher as headliners.
Posted by dhav14
Member since Jun 2014
9546 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 9:38 pm to
He has played 87 major league games. He will be fine. I have no issues with your stance on Tucker, but Bregman is deserving of patience.
Posted by wahoocs
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2004
22411 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 9:40 pm to
I don't think so, but if so, pull the damn trigger yesterday.

Martes has lost some luster, IMO.

I do understand Luhnow's approach here. He has been burned for the most part at trade deadlines.

I hope that doesn't affect his decision making this time around. We are obviously going to contend the next 3 years, and this move is too important.

With his success this offseason, I just as soon he had done the deal already.
Posted by Lsuhoohoo
Member since Sep 2007
95088 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 9:41 pm to
I've conceded that were going to have to give up Tucker if we aim for Quintana, Arher or Cole. These are above average pitchers, affordably controlled for the next several years. That doesn't come cheap in a trade. For me it's

1a. Archer
1b. Cole

2. Quintana


We may have to bite the bullet and recognize how good we are this year and say goodbye to Tucker.

Best case scenario for Tucker...Luhnow promotes him to Corpus after the all star break. He plays well and finishes out the season there. He starts 2018 at Corpus, plays well. Earns a promotion to AAA and if he plays well there it's a brief stint in AAA ( a la Correa and Bregman) before he's promoted to the majors mid season next year. This is his ETA if he doesn't struggle and need extra time at a minor league level. If he struggles, his arrival could be pushed into the middle parts of 2019.

If it's 2019, you could have nearly 2 seasons of Q, Archer or Cole by that point. You certainly think hard about giving up a guy with the kind of potential Tucker has. But with as good as we're poised to be at least this year and likely next year, I don't think you let a deal for one of those guys get hung up over Tucker.
Posted by lsusportsman2
Member since Oct 2007
27232 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 9:42 pm to
I fricking want Gerrit Cole. Straight up. Him or Archer, but I'd rather Cole.
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
32251 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 9:44 pm to
quote:

The average 3rd baseman in MLB hits 4 HRs w 48 RBIs hitting .250?



There are currently 17 3rd basemen that have a WAR lower than bregman.

Yuli and Bregman have equal WAR. Marwin loses a significant amount of his value if he has to play everyday at one single position.

And the whole point is this is Bregmans basement. No spring training and still <1 season in the MLB
Posted by Jwho77
cyperspace
Member since Sep 2003
76806 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 9:49 pm to
The only thing that would really HURT would be if we traded Martes, Tucker and F. Perez to get Cole/Archer/etc. To me, that would be giving too much because losing your three very best guys with a deep system would be bad business.
This post was edited on 5/17/17 at 9:50 pm
Posted by lsusportsman2
Member since Oct 2007
27232 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 9:50 pm to
Exactly. I want to keep Tucker as much as anybody, but if we have to get rid of him for Cole, Archer, Santana, or Quintana, I'm all for it. Other teams are only going to consider it if he is included.
Posted by wahoocs
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2004
22411 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 9:50 pm to
After Bregman had his great finish last year, I held my breath every time he was mentioned at the Winter Meetings.

I was hoping he would validate early, but not so much the first 40 games.

I am obviously a Bregman fan from LSU days, but I'm an Astros fan from 6 yo.

I will gladly laugh at my stupid arse for even wondering out loud if Bregman would have served the Astros better in an offseason trade when he's a perennial AS.
Posted by Jwho77
cyperspace
Member since Sep 2003
76806 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 9:54 pm to
quote:

Santana or Quintana


Trading Tucker plus more to get either of these two would suck.
Posted by dhav14
Member since Jun 2014
9546 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 9:56 pm to
quote:

Santana

His start to the year is a fraud
Posted by lsusportsman2
Member since Oct 2007
27232 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 9:59 pm to
I agree. The two I would mainly give up Tucker for are Cole and Archer, but Lunhow may disagree. He may like another starting pitcher like Quintana, or Vargas, or Santana, or Estrada, and he might be fine with giving up Tucker. We don't really know and we're just obviously guessing.
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
32251 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 9:59 pm to
The Tucker worthy trade is Cole+Tony Watson IMO. It addresses 3 needs-TOR starter, left handed reliever+closer experience if Giles goes to shite. Id give up essentially any significant assets for that.
This post was edited on 5/17/17 at 10:01 pm
Posted by dhav14
Member since Jun 2014
9546 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 10:03 pm to
I'm interested to see who we pick with our first 5 draft picks. Hard to predict atraderight now with a new wave of talent still to come in. Obviously can't trade the 2017 draftees but they could slot in as the new top guys if others are traded away.
Posted by wahoocs
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2004
22411 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 10:03 pm to
There are 17 starting 3rd baseman w a WAR less than Bregman?

Wow

I would say that says more about that stat being less significant than we thought.

Is there really 17 starting 3rd basemen w less than 1 HR and 12 RBIs w a .257 avg?

I know Bregs has his fair share of errors to go w his good defense too.

Hard to digest that unless I'm just misquoting you.
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
32251 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 10:09 pm to
quote:

There are 17 starting 3rd baseman w a WAR less than Bregman?

Wow

I would say that says more about that stat being less significant than we thought.

Is there really 17 starting 3rd basemen w less than 1 HR and 12 RBIs w a .257 avg?

I know Bregs has his fair share of errors to go w his good defense too.

Hard to digest that unless I'm just misquoting you.



A few of those 17 lost their job secondary to performance at the bottom of those 17 is Jhonny Peralta, Pablo Sandoval. Also among those 17 are Nick Castallanos, Todd Frazier and former tiger Ryan Schrimph .
This post was edited on 5/17/17 at 10:10 pm
Posted by wahoocs
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2004
22411 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 10:18 pm to
Schimpf is playing 3rd?

I thought I saw him in the OF, and w the emphasis on HRs these days, I would still think his WAR would be higher than Bregman's.

But, yes, I figured there must be some qualifications to that number. That number must represent anyone that started a game at 3rd base, not regular starting 3rd basemen.
first pageprev pagePage 14 of 17Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram