Started By
Message

re: CNN, NY Times, others blocked from WH Press gaggle

Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:27 pm to
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

Ok. I'll get back with you on that when the task is completed. You might want to grab a beer and kick your feet up.
Yeah I thought even you would have trouble with that amount of dishonest. Work on it.
Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
35577 posts
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:27 pm to
quote:


Breitbart was allowed in though

Says everything you need to know about the motivation behind this.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
141451 posts
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:28 pm to
Trump knows how to brighten up a Friday for us doesn't he.

Making Friday Great Again
Posted by boogiewoogie1978
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2012
17166 posts
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

Breitbart, OANN, Washington Times are all in White House briefing. CNN and NY Times (and LA Times) not allowed in.


Phase 1
Posted by TigersFan64
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2014
4755 posts
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

If CNN wasn't all shills then I'd be more upset about this.


Man, you people are really drinking that righwing Kool-Aid. If you want to see a bunch of shills, see Fox (Faux) News. That's nothing but the Republican News Network, and has been for years.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
141451 posts
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:28 pm to
Sounds like a good Friday for the Spice.

Were all the liberal outlets kicked in the nuts today?
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

Sounds like a good Friday for the Spice.

Were all the liberal outlets kicked in the nuts today?
No just three. A few others boycotted. A few went along.
Posted by aggressor
Austin, TX
Member since Sep 2011
8718 posts
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

quote:
Sounds good to me. They want to attack a president, then they shouldn't have the ability to be there. It's pathetic that the media is so against the man who is the leader of our country. Traitor like mentalities that is actually put on tv.


Do you really want a press corp that only prints positive articles about the President?

Why not just get rid of the 1st amendment and set up state run media. Works for North Korea.


Strawman argument.

No one is saying those outlets can't print or say whatever they want. Their freedom of the press and speech isn't abridged at all. Nowhere in the 1st Amendment though does it imply that the President has to give X amount of access to Y media outlets, not even close. Every President has given more or less access to different outlets for a variety of reasons, in fact some have actually stopped the media entirely from what they were printing (looking at you Honest Abe who even threw reporters in prison and destroyed printing presses for daring to oppose him).

Sorry that the NY Times got their feelings hurt that Trump doesn't GAF about them and doesn't feel the need to give them elite level access.
Posted by TigersFan64
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2014
4755 posts
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

Breitbart, OANN, Washington Times


Right-wing comic books^^^^ The epitome of "fake news."
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:31 pm to
Horse shite

Priebus story on cnn

frick you

Posted by UPT
NOLA
Member since May 2009
5519 posts
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

Breitbart is a more accurate and honest news outlet than the three that were banned.





No they aren't. Breitbart is sensationalist, clickbait, pseudo journalism.

CNN, Politico, and NYT are pretty fricking bad at the moment, but Breitbart is the crown jewel of partisan journalism and fake, sensational news.

You just mean that your biases more closely align with theirs.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
148089 posts
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:31 pm to
CNN has said they MAY not be going to the WH correspondents dinner. Good no one cares.

Before any one has a prog hissy fit...this is an OFF CAMERA GAGGLE. Not the normal press briefing.

Obama had these same gaggles with the media matters type of media he chose. They were mostly off record IIRC.

The 'White House Correspondents’ Association didn't say a word when Obama did this...
quote:

The White House blocked a number of news outlets from covering spokesman Sean Spicer’s question-and-answer session on Friday afternoon.

Spicer decided to hold an off-camera “gaggle” with reporters inside his West Wing office instead of the traditional on-camera briefing in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room.

Among the outlets not permitted to cover the gaggle were news organizations that President Trump has singled out for criticism, including CNN.

The New York Times, The Hill, Politico, BuzzFeed, the Daily Mail, BBC, the Los Angeles Times and the New York Daily News were among the other news organizations not permitted to attend.

Several right-leaning outlets were allowed into Spicer’s office, including Breitbart, the Washington Times and One America News Network.

A number of major news organizations were also let in to cover the gaggle. That group included ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox, Reuters and Bloomberg.

The White House Correspondents’ Association sharply criticized the decision.

LINK
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79503 posts
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:32 pm to
I'll enjoy the melt but

quote:

They want to attack a president, then they shouldn't have the ability to be there.


lulz

hero worship
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:33 pm to
I'm triggered

That's normalizing childhood obesity
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:33 pm to
Typical action and typical reaction. This is fricked up and will end poorly for everyone
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
141451 posts
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:33 pm to
There's a lot of people here so it's hard to keep track.

Please link to my praising of Fox News or kindly buy a slurpee and dump it on your lap.

I've long said I don't really watch Fox News and I think it's a political opinion station that serves as the counter to the endless biased liberal outlets. I enjoy some of the Fox News entertainers. I don't enjoy any of the entertainers on CNN. They aren't even good to look at.


Can you admit the same for CNN?
This post was edited on 2/24/17 at 1:35 pm
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
32145 posts
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:33 pm to
Why would you let a tabloid like CNN in?
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

Breitbart, OANN, Washington Times


It's funny that anyone thinks this is even a good fight to fight.

Does the admin really have a need to get its message out to the people who consume Breitbart, OAN, and WT? CNN et al have every incentive imaginable to dig in. Outlets make a lot more money in adversarial relationships with the government.
Posted by SoulGlo
Shinin' Through
Member since Dec 2011
17248 posts
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

Why not just get rid of the 1st amendment and set up state run media. Works for North Korea.



That's what we had until 1/20
Posted by Seldom Seen
Member since Feb 2016
40829 posts
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

Just in: @CNN @nytimes @Politico & others blocked from attending White House gaggle with @PressSec. WH has so far offered no explanation




Probably cause they are fake news would be my guess.
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 24
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 24Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram