- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: CNN, NY Times, others blocked from WH Press gaggle
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:27 pm to Lsupimp
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:27 pm to Lsupimp
quote:Yeah I thought even you would have trouble with that amount of dishonest. Work on it.
Ok. I'll get back with you on that when the task is completed. You might want to grab a beer and kick your feet up.
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:27 pm to Goldrush25
quote:
Breitbart was allowed in though
Says everything you need to know about the motivation behind this.
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:28 pm to joshnorris14
Trump knows how to brighten up a Friday for us doesn't he.
Making Friday Great Again
Making Friday Great Again
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:28 pm to Damone
quote:
Breitbart, OANN, Washington Times are all in White House briefing. CNN and NY Times (and LA Times) not allowed in.
Phase 1
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:28 pm to roadGator
quote:
If CNN wasn't all shills then I'd be more upset about this.
Man, you people are really drinking that righwing Kool-Aid. If you want to see a bunch of shills, see Fox (Faux) News. That's nothing but the Republican News Network, and has been for years.
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:28 pm to Navytiger74
Sounds like a good Friday for the Spice.
Were all the liberal outlets kicked in the nuts today?
Were all the liberal outlets kicked in the nuts today?
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:29 pm to roadGator
quote:No just three. A few others boycotted. A few went along.
Sounds like a good Friday for the Spice.
Were all the liberal outlets kicked in the nuts today?
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:30 pm to Haughton99
quote:
quote:
Sounds good to me. They want to attack a president, then they shouldn't have the ability to be there. It's pathetic that the media is so against the man who is the leader of our country. Traitor like mentalities that is actually put on tv.
Do you really want a press corp that only prints positive articles about the President?
Why not just get rid of the 1st amendment and set up state run media. Works for North Korea.
Strawman argument.
No one is saying those outlets can't print or say whatever they want. Their freedom of the press and speech isn't abridged at all. Nowhere in the 1st Amendment though does it imply that the President has to give X amount of access to Y media outlets, not even close. Every President has given more or less access to different outlets for a variety of reasons, in fact some have actually stopped the media entirely from what they were printing (looking at you Honest Abe who even threw reporters in prison and destroyed printing presses for daring to oppose him).
Sorry that the NY Times got their feelings hurt that Trump doesn't GAF about them and doesn't feel the need to give them elite level access.
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:30 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
Breitbart, OANN, Washington Times
Right-wing comic books^^^^ The epitome of "fake news."
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:31 pm to TigersFan64
Horse shite
Priebus story on cnn
frick you
Priebus story on cnn
frick you
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:31 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
Breitbart is a more accurate and honest news outlet than the three that were banned.
No they aren't. Breitbart is sensationalist, clickbait, pseudo journalism.
CNN, Politico, and NYT are pretty fricking bad at the moment, but Breitbart is the crown jewel of partisan journalism and fake, sensational news.
You just mean that your biases more closely align with theirs.
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:31 pm to tigerinDC09
CNN has said they MAY not be going to the WH correspondents dinner. Good no one cares.
Before any one has a prog hissy fit...this is an OFF CAMERA GAGGLE. Not the normal press briefing.
Obama had these same gaggles with the media matters type of media he chose. They were mostly off record IIRC.
The 'White House Correspondents’ Association didn't say a word when Obama did this...
Before any one has a prog hissy fit...this is an OFF CAMERA GAGGLE. Not the normal press briefing.
Obama had these same gaggles with the media matters type of media he chose. They were mostly off record IIRC.
The 'White House Correspondents’ Association didn't say a word when Obama did this...
quote:
The White House blocked a number of news outlets from covering spokesman Sean Spicer’s question-and-answer session on Friday afternoon.
Spicer decided to hold an off-camera “gaggle” with reporters inside his West Wing office instead of the traditional on-camera briefing in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room.
Among the outlets not permitted to cover the gaggle were news organizations that President Trump has singled out for criticism, including CNN.
The New York Times, The Hill, Politico, BuzzFeed, the Daily Mail, BBC, the Los Angeles Times and the New York Daily News were among the other news organizations not permitted to attend.
Several right-leaning outlets were allowed into Spicer’s office, including Breitbart, the Washington Times and One America News Network.
A number of major news organizations were also let in to cover the gaggle. That group included ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox, Reuters and Bloomberg.
The White House Correspondents’ Association sharply criticized the decision.
LINK
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:32 pm to public_enemy
I'll enjoy the melt but
lulz
hero worship
quote:
They want to attack a president, then they shouldn't have the ability to be there.
lulz
hero worship
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:33 pm to Sentrius
I'm triggered
That's normalizing childhood obesity
That's normalizing childhood obesity
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:33 pm to cajunangelle
Typical action and typical reaction. This is fricked up and will end poorly for everyone
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:33 pm to TigersFan64
There's a lot of people here so it's hard to keep track.
Please link to my praising of Fox News or kindly buy a slurpee and dump it on your lap.
I've long said I don't really watch Fox News and I think it's a political opinion station that serves as the counter to the endless biased liberal outlets. I enjoy some of the Fox News entertainers. I don't enjoy any of the entertainers on CNN. They aren't even good to look at.
Can you admit the same for CNN?
Please link to my praising of Fox News or kindly buy a slurpee and dump it on your lap.
I've long said I don't really watch Fox News and I think it's a political opinion station that serves as the counter to the endless biased liberal outlets. I enjoy some of the Fox News entertainers. I don't enjoy any of the entertainers on CNN. They aren't even good to look at.
Can you admit the same for CNN?
This post was edited on 2/24/17 at 1:35 pm
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:33 pm to tigerinDC09
Why would you let a tabloid like CNN in?
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:33 pm to TigersFan64
quote:
Breitbart, OANN, Washington Times
It's funny that anyone thinks this is even a good fight to fight.
Does the admin really have a need to get its message out to the people who consume Breitbart, OAN, and WT? CNN et al have every incentive imaginable to dig in. Outlets make a lot more money in adversarial relationships with the government.
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:34 pm to Haughton99
quote:
Why not just get rid of the 1st amendment and set up state run media. Works for North Korea.
That's what we had until 1/20
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:35 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
Just in: @CNN @nytimes @Politico & others blocked from attending White House gaggle with @PressSec. WH has so far offered no explanation
Probably cause they are fake news would be my guess.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News