Started By
Message

re: Sessions hearings - are they over?

Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:09 am to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425498 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:09 am to
if Booker was smart AND not using this as a jumping point, he'd stick to just criminal justice reform (Which he's been a big proponent of and it fits in with going against Sessions's past). if he concentrates on racism? pulls an Anita Hill? he's just pandering
Posted by conservativewifeymom
Mid Atlantic
Member since Oct 2012
12049 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:10 am to
Hope this one works for you:

LINK

Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425498 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:11 am to
quote:

Aren't these hearings a formality?

yes, which is why it's likely that Booker, who is just breaking protocol for no apparently rational reason, is likely to be using this as a stage (coordinated with the media and DEM party) to be pushed into the stratosphere of the political zeitgeist

this shite is all coordinated. hell yesterday when Franken brought up that Hebert guy, MSNBC had Hebert on stand by to give validity to Franken's "gotcha". they then failed to report how he's lied to Congress before about Sessions, as Cruz pointed out after the lunch break
Posted by conservativewifeymom
Mid Atlantic
Member since Oct 2012
12049 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:12 am to
You're really expecting too much!
Posted by conservativewifeymom
Mid Atlantic
Member since Oct 2012
12049 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:13 am to
Someone on another thread thinks the nominee for Secretary of State (Tillerson) is the least likely to make it.
Posted by Pax Regis
Alabama
Member since Sep 2007
12983 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:18 am to
Booker has financial entanglements with the Marxist Silicon Valley machine that are problems for him. He might want to chill his little arse out today. If he goes HAM I would expect he may be the subject of his own set of congressional hearings.
Posted by CoachChappy
Member since May 2013
32662 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:20 am to
Working, Thanks. Booker acting the arse now
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67524 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:21 am to
quote:

You know that Sessions has been prepping for this for a long while with the help of many in DC.

Correct

Sessions should say "hey Corey, remember when you were kissing my arse with regards to my work on Civil Rights? Everybody else does."

Drops mic, exits room.
Posted by Oddibe
Close to some, further from others
Member since Sep 2015
6571 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:23 am to
quote:

is likely to be using this as a stage (coordinated with the media and DEM party) to be pushed into the stratosphere of the political zeitgeist
I know Booker was in the spotlight for quite a while a few years ago, but is there some baggage associated with him as well? (I realize "baggage" is prerequisite for dem politicians)
Posted by CoachChappy
Member since May 2013
32662 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:24 am to
How does today work?
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
36779 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:25 am to
My issues with session go well beyond his sketchy ties to being a racist.

He's also a drug warrior. And neo con through and through.
Posted by conservativewifeymom
Mid Atlantic
Member since Oct 2012
12049 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:27 am to
Isn't there some archived video or something that could be used as counter-evidence against this sorry POS?
Posted by conservativewifeymom
Mid Atlantic
Member since Oct 2012
12049 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:29 am to
I'm willing to look at your evidence. Do you have any links?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425498 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:29 am to
quote:

Sessions should say "hey Corey, remember when you were kissing my arse with regards to my work on Civil Rights? Everybody else does."

pretty sure they'll allow him to seem honorable and above board and let Cruz or Graham point this out
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425498 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:30 am to
i don't like Sessions as a nominee, either

but i give him and the GOP credit for making the DEMs look foolish yesterday
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425498 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:31 am to
quote:

but is there some baggage associated with him as well?

i think so

i think he was originally celebrated as this savvy tech guy and investor and then that all turned into shite so they took him out of the limelight so that it wouldn't be used against him. i think that's what happened to tarnish his star
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
36779 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:35 am to
Voting record and multiple quotes on the subject with things like good people don't smoke weed and such.
Posted by conservativewifeymom
Mid Atlantic
Member since Oct 2012
12049 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 9:39 am to
He had quite a bit to say yesterday about this voting record. It's clear to me that, not being a lawyer and not being thoroughly familiar with the details of every issue he voted on, it's impossible to understand why he voted a certain way. It's also clear that many of his votes had to do with legal aspects of the piece of legislation being considered, and not with the issue. As for his quotes, at least we know where he stands and what his personal views and beliefs are. He made that perfectly clear yesterday. I don't think we can assume that he can't separate his own beliefs and the law, as it currently stands.
Posted by Oddibe
Close to some, further from others
Member since Sep 2015
6571 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 10:06 am to
quote:

i think so

i think he was originally celebrated as this savvy tech guy and investor and then that all turned into shite so they took him out of the limelight so that it wouldn't be used against him. i think that's what happened to tarnish his star

After a little research I found this. https://hotair.com/archives/2014/10/27/bad-timing-cory-booker-contends-with-subpoena-bad-press-ahead-of-senate-election/
quote:

Despite having resigned from his law firm once entering the mayor’s office, Booker received annual payments until 2011, during which time the firm was profiting handsomely off of Brick City
quote:

F]rom 2006 to 2011, Booker was still receiving annual payments, which totaled close to $700,000, from his former law firm—Trenk, DiPasquale, Webster—from which he had resigned once elected mayor to avoid “the appearance of impropriety.” Booker’s campaign spokeswoman, Silvia Alvarez, told me: “He was paid out by the firm as part of his separation agreement for work he performed before he became mayor.” OK, sure, but while Booker was profiting from the firm, they were profiting from Newark: over $2 million in work for Newark’s Housing Authority, the Watershed Conservation Development Corporation, and a wastewater agency. “That’s almost like Sharpe James-type shite,” one New Jersey Democratic operative offered.
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
36779 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 10:08 am to
The problem is were trying to change the law. Currently under law the feds should be kicking down medical marijuana clinics regardless of state law. I don't know that anyone really wants that but it's within the power of the ag to stop the entire legalization movement if he decides to.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram