Started By
Message
locked post

Does anyone still believe Steven Avery (M.A.M) is innocent?

Posted on 12/18/16 at 12:31 am
Posted by AlbertMeansWell
Member since Sep 2013
5565 posts
Posted on 12/18/16 at 12:31 am
It's been a year since the documentary aired and I wanted to see how everyone felt.
Posted by JohnZeroQ
Pelicans of Lafourche
Member since Jan 2012
8535 posts
Posted on 12/18/16 at 12:32 am to
Yes
Posted by Grim
Member since Dec 2013
12489 posts
Posted on 12/18/16 at 12:32 am to
He's guilty as sin. Just like Adnan syed
Posted by AlbertMeansWell
Member since Sep 2013
5565 posts
Posted on 12/18/16 at 12:33 am to
quote:

He's guilty as sin. Just like Adnan syed


Agreed. I think Dassey is innocent, though.
Posted by sec13rowBBseat28
St George, LA
Member since Aug 2006
15758 posts
Posted on 12/18/16 at 12:34 am to
Guilty
Posted by Tigerlaff
FIGHTING out of the Carencro Sonic
Member since Jan 2010
22127 posts
Posted on 12/18/16 at 12:34 am to
I wasn't on the jury, but I feel like there was enough reasonable doubt not to convict him based on the research I have done outside of the Netflix series, which is very biased.
Posted by LSUTigersVCURams
Member since Jul 2014
21940 posts
Posted on 12/18/16 at 12:35 am to
Of course Steven Avery is innocent. Adnan Syed on the other hand? Oh he guilty.
Posted by AlbertMeansWell
Member since Sep 2013
5565 posts
Posted on 12/18/16 at 12:36 am to
quote:

I wasn't on the jury, but I feel like there was enough reasonable doubt not to convict him based on the research I have done outside of the Netflix series, which is very biased.


I think there is no doubt he shouldn't have been convicted. I also think there is no doubt he did it.

It's a very confusing case.
Posted by The Seaward
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2006
11515 posts
Posted on 12/18/16 at 12:40 am to
I have no clue how anyone could feel near certain either way just from watching the documentaries. But I think most people overrate their ability to handle uncertainty, so I'm sure we will get a ton of black and white answers.
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge and Northshore LA
Member since Sep 2006
37980 posts
Posted on 12/18/16 at 1:11 am to
quote:

so I'm sure we will get a ton of black and white answers.

I'll check in when we do. ;-)
This post was edited on 12/18/16 at 1:14 am
Posted by NoSaint
Member since Jun 2011
12472 posts
Posted on 12/18/16 at 1:16 am to
He probably did it but the police did enough shady stuff to make me question conviction (even knowing the stuff outside the documentary)
Posted by TheDeathValley
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2010
20136 posts
Posted on 12/18/16 at 2:38 am to
I think he's guilty but I think his defense provided resonable doubt, specifically the tampered blood vial.
Posted by Bull Tiger7
BR
Member since Dec 2008
311 posts
Posted on 12/18/16 at 4:03 am to
The man is guilty.

quote:

tampered blood vial.


Was never tampered with

Puncture Hole is normal

FBI Test is scientifically valid

Evidence left out of the series:

Evidence Left out of Show

14 pieces of evidence left out of MAM

quote:

Avery's blood was found in six places in the Halbach vehicle, and DNA from his sweat was found on a hood latch, the prosecutor says


quote:

The car key unearthed in Avery's residence had DNA from his sweat on it, the prosecutor says



Posted by FreeState
Member since Jun 2012
3529 posts
Posted on 12/18/16 at 4:41 am to
Guilty. Documentary is one-sided and left out way too much.
Posted by KG6
Member since Aug 2009
10920 posts
Posted on 12/18/16 at 5:11 am to
I think there's a very good chance he did it. I have no real proof to say why I think that other than a gut feeling due to some weird actions taken on his part.

I feel the police and DA literally used the same feelings I have (gut feeling and no evidence) to convict him and that's absurd. And to bring down the nephew just to build the case since you have no evidence is awful.
Posted by BayouBengals18
Fort Worth
Member since Jan 2009
9843 posts
Posted on 12/18/16 at 5:16 am to
quote:

feel the police and DA literally used the same feelings I have (gut feeling and no evidence) to convict him and that's absurd


Well, it's the jury of his peers that found him guilty.....
Posted by Capital Cajun
Over Yonder
Member since Aug 2007
5601 posts
Posted on 12/18/16 at 5:34 am to
I think he's guilty And I feel like his nephew got screwed in the deal.

If the murder went down like the nephew said there would have been DNA evidence all over that trailer. The police screwed that kid.
This post was edited on 12/18/16 at 5:56 am
Posted by PairofDucks
Member since Jul 2016
4992 posts
Posted on 12/18/16 at 5:48 am to
Guilty.
Posted by drexyl
Mingovia
Member since Sep 2005
23343 posts
Posted on 12/18/16 at 5:58 am to
super guilty
Posted by dpd901
South Louisiana
Member since Apr 2011
7879 posts
Posted on 12/18/16 at 6:36 am to
He did it, the nephew helped. The evidence is overwhelming. The documentary is a biased position piece. Anyone who thinks he didn't is weak minded.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram