- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Does anyone still believe Steven Avery (M.A.M) is innocent?
Posted on 12/18/16 at 12:31 am
Posted on 12/18/16 at 12:31 am
It's been a year since the documentary aired and I wanted to see how everyone felt.
Posted on 12/18/16 at 12:32 am to AlbertMeansWell
He's guilty as sin. Just like Adnan syed
Posted on 12/18/16 at 12:33 am to Grim
quote:
He's guilty as sin. Just like Adnan syed
Agreed. I think Dassey is innocent, though.
Posted on 12/18/16 at 12:34 am to AlbertMeansWell
I wasn't on the jury, but I feel like there was enough reasonable doubt not to convict him based on the research I have done outside of the Netflix series, which is very biased.
Posted on 12/18/16 at 12:35 am to AlbertMeansWell
Of course Steven Avery is innocent. Adnan Syed on the other hand? Oh he guilty.
Posted on 12/18/16 at 12:36 am to Tigerlaff
quote:
I wasn't on the jury, but I feel like there was enough reasonable doubt not to convict him based on the research I have done outside of the Netflix series, which is very biased.
I think there is no doubt he shouldn't have been convicted. I also think there is no doubt he did it.
It's a very confusing case.
Posted on 12/18/16 at 12:40 am to AlbertMeansWell
I have no clue how anyone could feel near certain either way just from watching the documentaries. But I think most people overrate their ability to handle uncertainty, so I'm sure we will get a ton of black and white answers.
Posted on 12/18/16 at 1:11 am to The Seaward
quote:
so I'm sure we will get a ton of black and white answers.
I'll check in when we do. ;-)
This post was edited on 12/18/16 at 1:14 am
Posted on 12/18/16 at 1:16 am to AlbertMeansWell
He probably did it but the police did enough shady stuff to make me question conviction (even knowing the stuff outside the documentary)
Posted on 12/18/16 at 2:38 am to NoSaint
I think he's guilty but I think his defense provided resonable doubt, specifically the tampered blood vial.
Posted on 12/18/16 at 4:03 am to TheDeathValley
The man is guilty.
Was never tampered with
Puncture Hole is normal
FBI Test is scientifically valid
Evidence left out of the series:
Evidence Left out of Show
14 pieces of evidence left out of MAM
quote:
tampered blood vial.
Was never tampered with
Puncture Hole is normal
FBI Test is scientifically valid
Evidence left out of the series:
Evidence Left out of Show
14 pieces of evidence left out of MAM
quote:
Avery's blood was found in six places in the Halbach vehicle, and DNA from his sweat was found on a hood latch, the prosecutor says
quote:
The car key unearthed in Avery's residence had DNA from his sweat on it, the prosecutor says
Posted on 12/18/16 at 4:41 am to Bull Tiger7
Guilty. Documentary is one-sided and left out way too much.
Posted on 12/18/16 at 5:11 am to AlbertMeansWell
I think there's a very good chance he did it. I have no real proof to say why I think that other than a gut feeling due to some weird actions taken on his part.
I feel the police and DA literally used the same feelings I have (gut feeling and no evidence) to convict him and that's absurd. And to bring down the nephew just to build the case since you have no evidence is awful.
I feel the police and DA literally used the same feelings I have (gut feeling and no evidence) to convict him and that's absurd. And to bring down the nephew just to build the case since you have no evidence is awful.
Posted on 12/18/16 at 5:16 am to KG6
quote:
feel the police and DA literally used the same feelings I have (gut feeling and no evidence) to convict him and that's absurd
Well, it's the jury of his peers that found him guilty.....
Posted on 12/18/16 at 5:34 am to AlbertMeansWell
I think he's guilty And I feel like his nephew got screwed in the deal.
If the murder went down like the nephew said there would have been DNA evidence all over that trailer. The police screwed that kid.
If the murder went down like the nephew said there would have been DNA evidence all over that trailer. The police screwed that kid.
This post was edited on 12/18/16 at 5:56 am
Posted on 12/18/16 at 6:36 am to AlbertMeansWell
He did it, the nephew helped. The evidence is overwhelming. The documentary is a biased position piece. Anyone who thinks he didn't is weak minded.
Popular
Back to top


18








