- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Should we have allowed Canada to coach in Pitts bowl game?
Posted on 12/17/16 at 9:50 am
Posted on 12/17/16 at 9:50 am
We could have used him for some consulting and preparation imo
Posted on 12/17/16 at 9:53 am to oVo
It was a small concession in the negotiations to let him stay through the bowl game.
Big picture man, see that shite.
Big picture man, see that shite.
Posted on 12/17/16 at 10:03 am to oVo
quote:
Should we have allowed Canada to coach in Pitts bowl game?
Should Chicken have allowed you to post?
Posted on 12/17/16 at 10:06 am to oVo
I don't know about the "allowance" part but:
Who cares about Pitt? There's nothing wrong with wanting to have the best available on the field/sideline for every game, including this bowl game -- which the results will have an effect on recruiting.
So I get the spirit of what you're saying.
Who cares about Pitt? There's nothing wrong with wanting to have the best available on the field/sideline for every game, including this bowl game -- which the results will have an effect on recruiting.
So I get the spirit of what you're saying.
Posted on 12/17/16 at 10:10 am to Sampson
quote:
you stupid son of a [snitch]
That's a wee bit harsh, isn't it?
Posted on 12/17/16 at 10:11 am to oVo
of course Canada should be "allowed", why not?
btw you should watch the Pitt game; I enjoyed seeing Pitt beat Penn State earlier in the year.
Why did I enjoy it?
Because Canada's offense had a Penn State's defense that were bigger, stronger and had more depth on their heels all game, guessing, thinking, reactive and not proactive the whole game;
should be a nice preview of the possibilities of LSU's offense next season.
btw you should watch the Pitt game; I enjoyed seeing Pitt beat Penn State earlier in the year.
Why did I enjoy it?
Because Canada's offense had a Penn State's defense that were bigger, stronger and had more depth on their heels all game, guessing, thinking, reactive and not proactive the whole game;
should be a nice preview of the possibilities of LSU's offense next season.
This post was edited on 12/17/16 at 10:25 am
Posted on 12/17/16 at 10:12 am to oVo
quote:Yes. It's the right thing to do.
Should we have allowed Canada to coach in Pitts bowl game?
Posted on 12/17/16 at 10:24 am to oVo

Posted on 12/17/16 at 10:24 am to Tiger Khan
quote:
which the results will have an effect on recruiting.
No it won't
Posted on 12/17/16 at 10:33 am to oVo
Its a bowl game we can look at his offense closely, and see how he does in bowl preparations
Posted on 12/17/16 at 10:35 am to Bkaaw
He owes it to his team to coach them in bowl game. He can watch and take notes from tv.
Posted on 12/17/16 at 10:38 am to oVo
Yes we should have. He wasn't coaching ours.
Popular
Back to top
