- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

God President Trump explains the electoral college
Posted on 11/15/16 at 7:43 am
Posted on 11/15/16 at 7:43 am
Donald J. Trump
2m2 minutes ago
Donald J. Trump ?@realDonaldTrump
The Electoral College is actually genius in that it brings all states, including the smaller ones, into play. Campaigning is much different!
Donald J. Trump
7m7 minutes ago
Donald J. Trump ?@realDonaldTrump
If the election were based on total popular vote I would have campaigned in N.Y. Florida and California and won even bigger and more easily
2m2 minutes ago
Donald J. Trump ?@realDonaldTrump
The Electoral College is actually genius in that it brings all states, including the smaller ones, into play. Campaigning is much different!
Donald J. Trump
7m7 minutes ago
Donald J. Trump ?@realDonaldTrump
If the election were based on total popular vote I would have campaigned in N.Y. Florida and California and won even bigger and more easily
Posted on 11/15/16 at 7:44 am to joshnorris14
Posted on 11/15/16 at 7:46 am to joshnorris14
He's either confused or tweets random thoughts too easily. I voted for the guy, but maybe someone else should be in charge of the twitter handle...
Posted on 11/15/16 at 7:46 am to joshnorris14
Well he sounds much more rational than this guy. I hope he was able to reach out in 2012 and explain the electoral college to that very confused individual.


This post was edited on 11/15/16 at 7:48 am
Posted on 11/15/16 at 7:46 am to joshnorris14
It's such a lie to say "under a different set of rules, Hilary may have won." Of Nader a different set of rules, he would have campaigned differently. It's not like she had millions more in the popular vote.
Posted on 11/15/16 at 7:47 am to DupontsCircle
quote:
dude is everywhere on this issue
?@realDonaldTrump
The electoral college is a disaster for a democracy.
Yep, this was in 2012. I'm attributing this to his anger that Romney lost and not rational thought. But he really should consider this tweet before praising the electoral college here.
Posted on 11/15/16 at 7:47 am to joshnorris14
Jeeeeeeezus Christ. Even hardcore Trumpkins have to be just a bit unsettled about how many different opinions on one subject this guy has. fricks sake
Posted on 11/15/16 at 7:48 am to joshnorris14
I go back and forth too, problem is popular votes can be manipulated more easily than the electoral vote. The Electoral college can work so long as the process of counting and verifying votes is not corrupted by outsiders. It does give every state a voice because you can win 39 states and still lose the popular vote. Campaigning would be much different without the electoral college i do agree with that.
Posted on 11/15/16 at 7:48 am to SidewalkDawg
He has, how do we say, "evolved" on the issue.
Posted on 11/15/16 at 7:48 am to AUbused
Heaven forbid someone gain knowledge on a subject in four years and hold a counter opinion
Posted on 11/15/16 at 7:49 am to joshnorris14
Please use the correct term.
God-Elect President Trump.
God-Elect President Trump.
Posted on 11/15/16 at 7:49 am to AUbused
quote:
Jeeeeeeezus Christ. Even hardcore Trumpkins have to be just a bit unsettled about how many different opinions on one subject this guy has. fricks sake
The man hates losing. He hasn't had to do much of it throughout his lifetime. It's only natural to grasp at straws.
I won't hold the ignorance being spouted by democrats about the electoral college in 8 years against them if they win back the WH. This moaning about the electoral college is as routine as the sunrise.
This post was edited on 11/15/16 at 7:50 am
Posted on 11/15/16 at 7:49 am to SidewalkDawg
You plebs don't comprehend the troll. He knows that the 3 million illegal votes will eventually be discredited and he will have won the popular vote by over 2 mil. You keep falling for it and try to gotcha him for the 306th time, though.
Posted on 11/15/16 at 7:52 am to joshnorris14
quote:Well Romney actually lost the popular vote so he as factually incorrect then too.
Heaven forbid someone gain knowledge on a subject in four years and hold a counter opinion
BUT he was a 65 year old man when did not understand the purpose of the Electoral college.
BUT more importantly, he was willing to advocate for revolution based on false information (Romney won popular vote) and a misunderstanding of the system we have in place.
Posted on 11/15/16 at 7:52 am to Gusoline
quote:
You plebs don't comprehend the troll. He knows that the 3 million illegal votes will eventually be discredited and he will have won the popular vote by over 2 mil. You keep falling for it and try to gotcha him for the 306th time, though.
Look, it's fine to admit that Trump held a different view on this in 2012 and still support him.
He's not literally infallible and I think you may be taking his genius a little far with this one.
Posted on 11/15/16 at 7:53 am to AUbused
Given the fact that he didn't run in 2012, but did now tells me he got more information and educated himself about a lot of things in the interim.
Are you telling me you haven't learned anything you didn't previously understand, in the last 4 years?
Are you telling me you haven't learned anything you didn't previously understand, in the last 4 years?
This post was edited on 11/15/16 at 7:54 am
Posted on 11/15/16 at 7:53 am to joshnorris14
The Dems crying about popular vote is the epitome of "moving the goalposts". Using popular vote instead of EC woukd change the entire election cycle. Candidates would campaign differently. The ground game would be different. And the electorate would react differently. And as a result, the popular vote numbers would look different than they do today.
It's a retarded argument at this point because the candidates campaigned and the electorate voted based on the set rules going into it. Why are liberals so dumb and/or intellectually dishonest?
It's a retarded argument at this point because the candidates campaigned and the electorate voted based on the set rules going into it. Why are liberals so dumb and/or intellectually dishonest?
Posted on 11/15/16 at 7:53 am to Gusoline
quote:
He knows that the 3 million illegal votes will eventually be discredited and he will have won the popular vote by over 2 mil.
You people are delusional.
Posted on 11/15/16 at 7:54 am to Gusoline
quote:So he knew about the 2016 election in 2012?
You plebs don't comprehend the troll. He knows that the 3 million illegal votes will eventually be discredited and he will have won the popular vote by over 2 mil. You keep falling for it and try to gotcha him for the 306th time, though.
And I love how some random tweet with no evidence (3 million illegal voters) is now a point being argued as fast.
This post was edited on 11/15/16 at 7:55 am
Posted on 11/15/16 at 7:55 am to joshnorris14
He's just saying "whatever the rules of the game, I will still beat you."
Popular
Back to top

14





