Started By
Message
locked post

.

Posted on 11/12/16 at 9:16 am
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 9:16 am
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/18/22 at 3:33 pm
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99174 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 9:17 am to
Very few will be against it, so very little ED will be necessary
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54231 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 9:17 am to
Nope. I'd think that the majority of the landowners will be glad to see it.
Posted by Lou Pai
Member since Dec 2014
28149 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 9:17 am to
It's literally a wall on the border. Do easements and compensate them for it. Eta: or something... not sure if easement is the correct word here.
This post was edited on 11/12/16 at 9:19 am
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 9:19 am to
quote:


It's literally a wall on the border. Do easements and compensate them for it.



That's one big fricking easement
Posted by mofungoo
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2012
4583 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 9:19 am to
The USA owns the border.
Posted by bamafan1001
Member since Jun 2011
15783 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 9:19 am to
Mexico is gonna pay those ranchers a shite-ton for the use of the edge of their property
Posted by Crimson Wraith
Member since Jan 2014
24919 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 9:20 am to
Most want the wall due to the violence of drug runners, sex slave trafficking, terrorists, etc. One guy built a tower attached to his house just to keep an eye on his southern property line.

The country has to be secured and the good of the many outweighs the good of any few dissenters.

They will be paid and a wall won't take up that much space.

MAGA!
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54231 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 9:23 am to
quote:

They will be paid


I just wonder if any of the owners will say, "hell, you build the wall and you can have the land". Patriotic kind of thingy.
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 9:24 am to
quote:

Very few will be against it, so very little ED will be necessary



Source?
Posted by Crimson Wraith
Member since Jan 2014
24919 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 9:25 am to
quote:

quote:
Very few will be against it, so very little ED will be necessary


Source?


What source do you have to the contrary?
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76556 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 9:28 am to
ED is intended for things like this. It's what it's for. So no, I have no problem with it.
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 9:29 am to
quote:

What source do you have to the contrary?



The existing wall that required a lot of ED
Posted by TakingStock
Member since Jun 2009
6092 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 9:29 am to
Do you honestly think a rancher who is dealing with thousands of illegals trespassing on his land will care if the government needs to take a few acres to build a wall to keep them out?
Posted by TROLA
BATON ROUGE
Member since Apr 2004
12407 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 9:31 am to
Getting the ranchers to allow a wall is going to be akin to getting your kids up on Christmas morning..
Posted by WONTONGO
Member since Oct 2007
4297 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 9:32 am to
It's been a long time, maybe 15 years, but 60 mins did a piece on building a wall. I seem to remember a lot of ranchers down there especially the ones right on the Rio Grande that were opposed to it because essentially the wall would cut off their access to the river.

Since then I think a lot of them have changed their tune due to the drug cartels, but I remember thinking it was interesting at the time. A point of view I had never thought of.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119031 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 9:33 am to
quote:

Does that change anyone's opinion or are you still cool with it?


It's really not up to us. In terms of ED it's up to the federal government and the land owners. The land owners are protected by the 5th amendment. They will be justly compensated.

Most of the land owners will be fine with the wall. However there will be a couple of hold outs, as there always are, that will garner all the media attention.
Posted by Jyrdis
TD Premium Member Level III
Member since Aug 2015
12812 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 9:35 am to
Hell, build the wall on their property and tell them that they are welcome that illegals are no longer crossing over onto their property. If I were the property owner, I'd be thrilled.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119031 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 9:36 am to
quote:

I just wonder if any of the owners will say, "hell, you build the wall and you can have the land". Patriotic kind of thingy.





I'm sure many will.
Posted by skinny domino
sebr
Member since Feb 2007
14350 posts
Posted on 11/12/16 at 9:36 am to
quote:

What source do you have to the contrary?
hmm...go frick with a rancher's property in West Texas and see the 2nd amendment folks spring into action - kinda like the Bundy's.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram