- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Real Life Examples of LA Amendment 3
Posted on 11/7/16 at 11:08 am
Posted on 11/7/16 at 11:08 am
How many of you have calculated the impact if Amendment 3 passes? I did a calculation for the company I work for. Based on about 1.5M of Federal taxable income, there would be a 31% increase in state taxes if passed. Would love to hear if there are any examples of a decrease in tax under the proposal.
7
Posted on 11/7/16 at 11:40 am to CubsFanBudMan
if that amendment gets passed, the voting is surely rigged
Posted on 11/7/16 at 1:07 pm to CubsFanBudMan
I'm voting no on all of the amendments except for the tuition amendment.
Posted on 11/7/16 at 1:43 pm to CubsFanBudMan
These amendments are uniformly awfully written. What percentage of voters will even be able to parse this:
Much less know what a registrar does.
quote:
Do you support an amendment to provide that the manner of appointment for the registrar of voters in each parish is as provided by law and to require the qualifications of the registrar to be provided by law?
Much less know what a registrar does.
Posted on 11/7/16 at 4:18 pm to CubsFanBudMan
Did a rough estimate for us...increase would be somewhere in the upper 30's.
Posted on 11/7/16 at 9:52 pm to CubsFanBudMan
You would have to have a significantly different federal taxable income from LA taxable income (like because of use of NOLs or certain deductions).
Posted on 11/8/16 at 10:44 am to CubsFanBudMan
Has anyone heard of any reason why this would be proposed as a constitutional amendment rather than a statute, other than the typical reason that the legislators don't want to risk taking a vote on anything? I'm not necessarily opposed to it in principle, but I really have a problem with setting the tax rate through a constitutional amendment.
Posted on 11/8/16 at 2:31 pm to CubsFanBudMan
I voted No for all the amendments.
I also vote No for every Brec or Public transportation amendment even if for renewal. It usually passes anyway but not because of my vote.
BREC gets WAY to much money now for what we get as a community and no reason for me to fund a public transportation system I never use. Let it fund itself and if it can't then so be it.
I also vote No for every Brec or Public transportation amendment even if for renewal. It usually passes anyway but not because of my vote.
BREC gets WAY to much money now for what we get as a community and no reason for me to fund a public transportation system I never use. Let it fund itself and if it can't then so be it.
This post was edited on 11/8/16 at 2:32 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News