Started By
Message

Rob Manfred, MLBPA have discussed 154 game season

Posted on 7/25/16 at 1:47 pm
Posted by WallEazyE
Member since Jul 2016
41 posts
Posted on 7/25/16 at 1:47 pm
quote:

“There are ways to produce more off days in the schedule," he said, according to The Associated Press. "Some of those have very significant economic ramifications that — if in fact we’re going down those roads — those economic ramifications are going to have to be shared by all of the relevant parties. You want to work less, usually you get paid less. But we are prepared to discuss the schedule issues and make proposals that are responsive to the ones that we’ve received from the MLBPA.”


quote:

Most concerning (for players) however, would be the question of player salaries. As Manfred said, the idea of cutting a season short would mean the idea that players will be paid less — or give back salary — would be a fairly damning idea to the MLBPA. The idea already has Players Association president Tony Clark on the defensive. "I don't agree that there would need to be a discussion about a loss of salary or a rollback of salaries," Clark said, according to the AP. "If there is a lessening of the games and we put players in the position where playing whatever number of games are in that season, they're able to play, the value of every game goes up as well."


154 game season discussed

Posted by UNO
Member since Mar 2015
4961 posts
Posted on 7/25/16 at 1:48 pm to
good
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
54382 posts
Posted on 7/25/16 at 1:50 pm to
But, what about the records and stats!!!!
Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
50385 posts
Posted on 7/25/16 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

. "I don't agree that there would need to be a discussion about a loss of salary or a rollback of salaries," Clark said, according to the AP. "If there is a lessening of the games and we put players in the position where playing whatever number of games are in that season, they're able to play, the value of every game goes up as well."


Have to love union logic
Posted by The Sad Banana
The gate is narrow.
Member since Jul 2008
89498 posts
Posted on 7/25/16 at 2:04 pm to
That's shortening the season 8 games. What the hell difference does that make?
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32988 posts
Posted on 7/25/16 at 2:12 pm to
They should consider cutting the season by 162 games.
Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
63044 posts
Posted on 7/25/16 at 4:18 pm to
8 games less equates to 1.2 more off days a month. Not so much to even recognize it.
But I'd say the season is entirely too long as it is.
I'd vote to instead of extra off days, end the season 8 - 9 days sooner.
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
33996 posts
Posted on 7/25/16 at 4:44 pm to
I know it will never happen in a million years but I always wanted baseball to have a round-robin 174 game schedule with every team playing each other six times. Have the two teams with the best overall record play each other in the World Series. It would be the best way of determining a champion in a sport that has notoriously volatile results.
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
42585 posts
Posted on 7/25/16 at 8:26 pm to
Wonder if this is tied to expansion. Rumor is Mexico City and Montreal will be getting a new team next go around. Would allow for travel.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 7/25/16 at 10:15 pm to
Well shite they don't play the other teams in their league outside their division enough as it is.

need to cut back the interleague crap, which mostly is as exciting as a Packers-Jags or Chargers-Giants matchup

Of course, with the idiocy of 15 team leagues at least 1/15th of the games must be interleague
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram