- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Is anyone still against mandatory body cameras?
Posted on 7/7/16 at 2:01 pm
Posted on 7/7/16 at 2:01 pm
And not just a cheap clip that can fall off. But a pin that can only come off with ripped clothing.
Is there anyone still thinks that body cameras are a bad idea?
Is there anyone still thinks that body cameras are a bad idea?
Posted on 7/7/16 at 2:01 pm to CCTider
quote:
Is there anyone still thinks that body cameras are a bad idea?
who thought that to begin with?
Posted on 7/7/16 at 2:02 pm to CCTider
I know a couple cops who say it's a bad idea.
Posted on 7/7/16 at 2:03 pm to CCTider
The clip on ones fall off basically every time a cop makes a physically aggressive move, also known as the only time you ever really need them.
Posted on 7/7/16 at 2:03 pm to CCTider
quote:
Is anyone still against mandatory body cameras?
1st is was Health Insurance and now body cams. Are they going to penalize me on my taxes if I do not get one?
Posted on 7/7/16 at 2:03 pm to CCTider
quote:
there anyone still thinks that body cameras are a bad idea?
I am sure there are a few departments that do. Notably the Boston Police Department- they have a "voluntary" body cam pilot program where the LEO can turn them on and off as they see fit. The police chief said he didn't see the need for them, and enacted the pilot program as proof they would show nothing.
This post was edited on 7/7/16 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 7/7/16 at 2:03 pm to CCTider
quote:
Is anyone still against mandatory body cameras?
I don't think many people ever were.
quote:
Is there anyone still thinks that body cameras are a bad idea?
I don't think many people ever did.
quote:
And not just a cheap clip that can fall off. But a pin that can only come off with ripped clothing.
Who's paying? I don't think anyone is opposed to the idea, but that's not free, and our city/state isn't exactly flush with cash.
Posted on 7/7/16 at 2:04 pm to LucasP
quote:
I know a couple cops who say it's a bad idea.
I bet the cops in BR wish theirs had stayed on so the morons in society could see that the guy had a gun.
Posted on 7/7/16 at 2:05 pm to CCTider
We need better mounts if anything
Posted on 7/7/16 at 2:06 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
bet the cops in BR wish theirs had stayed on so the morons in society could see that the guy had a gun.
I bet the rogue marshals that killed the six year old boy wish theirs had fallen off.
Posted on 7/7/16 at 2:06 pm to CCTider
quote:
Is there anyone still thinks that body cameras are a bad idea?
in theory, i want cops under 24-hour surveillance. In practice, I think it opens doors for surveilling private citizens (further) and the cam/recording systems are probably easily tampered with/footage altered etc, and won't do any good. but maybe some good tech advances will make any "glitches" or intentional alteration impossible. And maybe cops walking around videoing everyone, all the time isn't as big a concern as the abuse it is designed to thwart. My gut just doesn't love it.
This post was edited on 7/7/16 at 2:07 pm
Posted on 7/7/16 at 2:10 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
who thought that to begin with?
*raises hand.
But I am just against how prolific cameras are in general. I recognize that I am different on this issue but I feel like a person should have the right to not be filmed/photographed.
Posted on 7/7/16 at 2:17 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
I bet the cops in BR wish theirs had stayed on so the morons in society could see that the guy had a gun
I agree. Plus, nobody knows what happened in Minnesota before the filming began. All of these cops may be innocent and did the right thing. But we don't have a clue because of the angles on the camera.
I do know that their badges never fall off. Just pin those cameras on their shirt.
I think with someone that had such great authority, and their testimony tends to hold more sway than an average citizens, they need checks and balances.
The money should come from the federal government, and be a federal law. If we can give police departments billions of sugars of military equipment, why not cameras? In 2016, that's a pretty easy task to accomplish.
Posted on 7/7/16 at 2:18 pm to LucasP
quote:
I know a couple cops who say it's a bad idea.
Why do they think that?
Posted on 7/7/16 at 2:20 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
who thought that to begin with?
exactly
Posted on 7/7/16 at 2:20 pm to CCTider
(no message)
This post was edited on 2/12/17 at 12:29 pm
Posted on 7/7/16 at 2:21 pm to Rounder1
quote:
I recognize that I am different on this issue but I feel like a person should have the right to not be filmed/photographed.
If that is an accepted part of the job then there are no issues. The problem will be with existing cops that didn't sign on with cameras in place and now have to deal with it. I look at it like GPS on work trucks, most of the time it doesn't matter but it can help or hurt you in the wrong times.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News