Started By
Message

re: Is it time to revise or add to the CFB blue bloods roster?

Posted on 6/30/16 at 10:07 am to
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86582 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 10:07 am to
quote:

Michigan State should be considered moving forward


Posted by Grandioso
Driftwood, TX
Member since Dec 2015
1597 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 10:12 am to
quote:

Dantonio has built them into a B1G power


After that Alabama game...

Michigan State looked like the 2012 Notre Dame team. Smoke and mirrors.
Posted by Buckeye06
Member since Dec 2007
23144 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 10:15 am to
quote:

2016 Recruiting rankings:

Texas - #6
Texas A&M - #17
TCU - #22
Baylor - #36
Texas Tech - #46


I mean lets be fair here. Didn't Baylor just lose like 4 guys to Texas and therefore they plummeted and Texas is going up?

Texas is losing more top guys to outside state schools I would say than TCU/Baylor. LSU has always done well in the state, OSU is trying to open pipelines and other schools are getting a few they hadn't in the past
Posted by Grandioso
Driftwood, TX
Member since Dec 2015
1597 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 10:18 am to
quote:


I mean lets be fair here. Didn't Baylor just lose like 4 guys to Texas and therefore they plummeted and Texas is going up?


I don't believe that had anything to do with the rankings. In fact, it should make the #6 class just that much stronger.
quote:

LSU has always done well in the state


Always? Since the Saban/Miles era. And it's typically confined to the Houston area.

quote:

OSU is trying to open pipelines and other schools are getting a few they hadn't in the past


Everyone is trying to open a pipeline in Texas. Who wouldn't? Nebraska had a steady, steady stream for a long time. Obviously, Oklahoma recruits very well in the state. Colorado used to recruit Texas (and New Orleans too) well in the 80's and 90's.

Honestly, Ole Miss is probably the out-of-state team recruiting better than any. Shady bustards.
This post was edited on 6/30/16 at 10:23 am
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 10:22 am to
you left out Yale. they were awarded the mythical natty many times
and their win total must be astronomical, although their percentage may be lousy now.

I say this in response to Pitt. I only was aware of their Jackie Sherril/Tony Dorsett title.
They must have won 8 of those before 1952, which was the year I heard Maryland vs Oklahoma on the radio for the mythical natty, since I was living in Maryland and thought they walked on water until the Okies thrashed them.
This post was edited on 6/30/16 at 10:23 am
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
59424 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 10:29 am to
quote:

Texas - #6


Was that before or after they get the Baylor guys?

I think on one hand, UT fans and admin has been delusional during their last few searches. LSU fans have shown themselves to be just as foolish, thinking "we're LSU, people will be lining up to coach here." What most seem to forget is how important timing is to this whole thing. Both programs want established coaches, but that list is short and those guys already have good jobs. And likely kids who are in school and don't want to leave, etc..

However, people dismissing UT have likely not spent much time in Austin. Like LSU fans saying "why would Maneiri ever leave LSU for UT--he be stupid to make a lateral move." But Austin is a much nicer place to live than Baton Rouge. Better schools and many more things to do. Getting a house on Lake Travis or Lake Austin is much cooler than one on Highland Road. So much more live music. Park at Auditorium Shores and run around Town Lake with the city skyline in the background. Zilker Park. Festivals every weekend.

I love LSU, so I'm happy to be in Baton Rouge. But objectively, Austin provides a much higher quality of life. That's why I would never dismiss any rumor involving any coach going there at anytime. That being said, it's not so great that UT can just snap their fingers and get Saban, entrenched in Alabam pa creating a legacy as likely the best coach in the history of college football. Because they're Texas, everyone should--and will--listen. But the timing has to be right. And it almost never is for any upper echelon program trying to poach a great coach from another upper echelon one. Just look at the last several football searches for UT, Bama, Michigan, Notre Dame, Florida, USC, etc...

That being said, I think UT is at a disadvantage with playing at Disch-Falk. I'm sure they've made some improvements since I last attended games there(Huston Streets' last year), but it's stil not on campus, it's still on the East side of 35, the parking is still shite, and I'm not sure if they've replaced the turf with natural grass yet, but that place would get hot as balls in May. It's just not a great home field.
Posted by Dixie Normus
Earth
Member since Sep 2013
2641 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 10:34 am to
I put the website I used in the OP, right below all the statistics.
Posted by Buckeye06
Member since Dec 2007
23144 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 10:35 am to
quote:

And it almost never is for any upper echelon program trying to poach a great coach from another upper echelon one. Just look at the last several football searches for UT, Bama, Michigan, Notre Dame, Florida, USC, etc..


This in so many ways. It just so happened to work out that Meyer came around when Tressel left

I think those rankings are post the 4 guys switching
Posted by Dixie Normus
Earth
Member since Sep 2013
2641 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 10:36 am to
When I said that, I used it as a point of reference to say that Texas has not been playing well currently, but is undoubtedly still a blue blood from a historical standpoint.
Posted by JBeam
Guns,Germs & Steel
Member since Jan 2011
68377 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 10:37 am to
quote:

I love the (w) here as if anyone would ever think you were talking about South Carolina in a blue bloods convo.

The four S.Carolina fans on the internet are going to come at you bro.
Posted by Dixie Normus
Earth
Member since Sep 2013
2641 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 10:42 am to
I mean, if you consider the sheer amount of years it will take to catch up to them and actually displace them, it's not going to be an easy task. Sure, Nebraska hasn't been good in a while, but winning 8 games a year means teams are only catching up to them by maybe two games a year. They also have a bunch of titles. That's also very difficult to catch up to.

I also think you're forgetting that this is from a historical perspective, not a current one. Texas, USC, and Nebraska are currently mediocre to bad, but their history as blue bloods is indisputable.
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
30355 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 10:55 am to
Texas is only considered a blue blood because they keep telling us they are. Over the last 40 years they have as many NCs as Climpson, Ga Tech and BYU. Not exactly blue blood material. If you took off the logos on the helmet and looked at their production, the Horns are a solid, not spectacular program. You can't be the subject of more, "WTF is wrong with Texas???" questions than you are title considerations and be considered a blue blood.
Posted by Grandioso
Driftwood, TX
Member since Dec 2015
1597 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 11:02 am to
quote:

Texas is only considered a blue blood because they keep telling us they are. Over the last 40 years they have as many NCs as Climpson, Ga Tech and BYU. Not exactly blue blood material.


You can say the same for Michigan.
Posted by AlonsoWDC
Memphis, where it ain't Ten-a-Key
Member since Aug 2014
8778 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 11:04 am to
quote:

I love the (w) here as if anyone would ever think you were talking about South Carolina in a blue bloods convo.




The only thing South Carolina would be in a blue blood conversation is how much of a bitch they are in their rivalry with Clemson.
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
30355 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 11:11 am to
Yup. Agree. Michigan is even worse because the coach they idolize was 0fer his first 8 Rose Bowls.
Posted by Waffle House
NYC
Member since Aug 2008
3946 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 11:12 am to
Alabama really should be in a class all its own, considering they amassed theirs in a conference with 5 others schools in the next tier on your list.

The SEC's overall historical strength hurts all six of those schools when you try and compare them with 1 or 2 team top heavy conferences.
Posted by ZoeFemme
Texas
Member since May 2016
85 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 11:19 am to
why not?
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 11:24 am to
CFB Data Warehouse has a decent all-time program ranking system here:

LINK

The crazy thing is teams 9-13 are all SEC teams. It shows the depth of the conference, as most conferences are really just one or two great teams and a lot of chaff. It also makes Bama's #1 ranking more impressive.

But what's interesting is they have rankings for Last XX years, and they have one for 35 years, which is about the modern era of college football, 1980 on. That's about when national TV games became more common and there was a shift from winning your conference to winning the national title. Also, the more modern passing game got going here. Here's their Last 35 years rankings:

LINK

1 Miami
2 FSU
3 Bama
4 Florida
5 Nebraska
6 Ohio St
7 USC
8 Oklahoma
9 Michigan
10 LSU
Posted by hoopsgalore
Chicago, IL
Member since Nov 2013
8657 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 11:39 am to
The first link includes Minnesota inside the Top-20, and they're weighted almost entirely by six national championships before WWII ended. Minnesota hasn't been to a major bowl game in over a half-century.

Back then, when Minnesota was claiming national titles, seasons ended by December and a Final Poll was taken.

Personally, I don't see how you can draw too many conclusions about quality of a conference.
This post was edited on 6/30/16 at 11:41 am
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35675 posts
Posted on 6/30/16 at 11:39 am to
quote:

14 Nat'l titles




I guess if you repeat a lie long enough it becomes true.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram