Started By
Message

re: Eating Bass

Posted on 2/7/16 at 2:32 pm to
Posted by CSATiger
The Battlefield
Member since Aug 2010
6230 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 2:32 pm to
Bream> White perch > bass > catfish
Posted by CSATiger
The Battlefield
Member since Aug 2010
6230 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 2:38 pm to
my Pap Paw always said..
"if it's got eyes, it fries"
Posted by ctiger69
Member since May 2005
30616 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 4:12 pm to
You have to many libtards as friends. They are to busy passing judgment onto others.

It is ok to eat bass as long as you meet the size limit and total number limit,
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
42582 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 4:34 pm to
OP is getting crushed, but for opposite reasons when he posted on FB. He can't catch a break.
Posted by SmackoverHawg
Member since Oct 2011
27385 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 4:36 pm to
Is eatin' them not the point of catching them? If they're so damn worried about the bass population, maybe they should only catch what they eat. I'll guarantee they kill more with catch and release than you did with your fish fry.
Posted by The Torch
DFW The Dub
Member since Aug 2014
19493 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 7:46 pm to
quote:

OP is getting crushed, but for opposite reasons when he posted on FB. He can't catch a break


Don't worry - The OP (me) is an old school redneck from North La, these internet jackholes make me laugh.

I would have thrown all the bass back but I drove 4 hrs, spent about $150 on gas , baits, food etc etc. So kept everyone I caught and they were damn good :) no worries.

And I have a facebook
Posted by Palo Gaucho
Benton
Member since Jul 2013
3338 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 8:02 pm to
I would knock on he heads off of every one I caught from now on. Bunch of cry babies.
Posted by offshoretrash
Farmerville, La
Member since Aug 2008
10180 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 8:04 pm to
I never keep anything over 3 lbs, during spring I try to just keep the males. There is no reason to keep big fish to fillet unless you are not that good at catching them.

I like a mess of fish as much as anyone but I also understand that the number of fishermen are increasing and if everyone keeps those big fish the lake will suffer.

There is no doubt in my mind that D'Arbonne has been hurt because of over fishing when the lake is drawn down.

A lake the size of Toledo it doesn't hurt the lake as bad because of all the big, deep water.

Posted by INFIDEL
The couch
Member since Aug 2006
16199 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 8:41 pm to
I laugh at em when they bitch about me eatin bass. It's a stupid argument.
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
49117 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 9:14 pm to
Who are you FB friends with? Of course you eat the shite out of bass
Posted by Cadello
Eunice
Member since Dec 2007
47817 posts
Posted on 2/7/16 at 10:46 pm to
Don't like keeping them over 4 pounds even at Toledo. They just don't taste as good.
My buddy is an old coonass and sometimes it's a fight get him to let bigger ones go.
If I catch them, I release the big ones everytime.
Posted by CFDoc
Member since Jan 2013
2098 posts
Posted on 2/8/16 at 7:29 am to
quote:

Don't like keeping them over 4 pounds


Me either. But I'm actually closer to 3. The 1-2 lb'ers are the best filets.

Both extreme ends of the argument are total dick bags. It's not hard to be a level headed, logical fisherman that ethically takes fish while also being cognizant of the role conservation plays on our fisheries.
Posted by King of the Sabine
Member since Jan 2016
149 posts
Posted on 2/8/16 at 7:31 am to
We keep a few small one's under 3 lbs to eat from time to time but not many. Really would rather bream and white perch for table fare
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81818 posts
Posted on 2/8/16 at 8:40 am to
quote:

But I'm actually closer to 3. The 1-2 lb'ers are the best filets.
This is where I am.
Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
26822 posts
Posted on 2/8/16 at 9:46 am to
I fished with Dion Hibdon in the 2000 Top 150... He said he eats bass all the time... He had nothing against keeping smaller fish...

I actually like bass better than speckle trout...
This post was edited on 2/8/16 at 9:47 am
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81818 posts
Posted on 2/8/16 at 10:24 am to
Catfish>Perch>Bream>Bass>grennil
Posted by LouisianaChessie
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since May 2010
2582 posts
Posted on 2/8/16 at 10:36 am to
My brother went to Toledo bend yesterday and fished out of our pathfinder bay boat, tore the fish absolutely up, and kept a frick pile of them. He said there were endless rustled jimmies at the launch. But he's all of 6' 3" and 220 so he just smiles at them.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81818 posts
Posted on 2/8/16 at 10:45 am to
quote:

and kept a frick pile of them. He said there were endless rustled jimmies at the launch.
he know the limit?
Posted by EyeoftheEldrick12
Member since Jul 2012
1949 posts
Posted on 2/8/16 at 10:56 am to
Keeping fish is not a problem. Keeping fish that weigh 5+ pounds is a problem. nothing good comes from keeping those bigger fish.
Posted by maisweh
Member since Jan 2014
4084 posts
Posted on 2/8/16 at 11:02 am to
quote:

Keeping fish that weigh 5+ pounds is a problem. nothing good comes from keeping those bigger fish.

Except filets... and delicious fried eggs
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram