Started By
Message

Moby Dick "In The Heart of The Sea" flops in first weekend

Posted on 12/14/15 at 8:41 am
Posted by Tiger Ree
Houston
Member since Jun 2004
24558 posts
Posted on 12/14/15 at 8:41 am
With an estimated budget of $150 million for "Heart of the Sea," the whaling ship that inspired "Moby Dick," beached itself with an initial domestic haul of only $11 million. Worse, that $11 million was a figure inflated by IMAX and 3D ticket sales.

https://www.ibtimes.com/chris-hemsworths-heart-sea-beaches-itself-opening-weekend-only-11-million-haul-2223497

Posted by BurlesonCountyAg
Member since Jan 2014
3020 posts
Posted on 12/14/15 at 8:44 am to
This movie looks awful.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89765 posts
Posted on 12/14/15 at 8:48 am to
Sad, because Ronnie Howard is a great filmmaker - and he eschewed some of the CGI to shoot a "real" movie, where that was possible. I haven't seen it, but the choice of story seemed okay.

Maybe a disconnect with audience expectations. This more of a survival story than an adventure one - but the trailers tended to push the adventure angle.

Master and Commander was a commercial flop, too, but a great film, regardless.
Posted by bigpetedatiga
Alexandria, LA
Member since Aug 2009
8633 posts
Posted on 12/14/15 at 9:20 am to
I didn't even know this was a movie.

Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
69383 posts
Posted on 12/14/15 at 9:21 am to
I wanted to see it this weekend, but my theater has half of their screen closed (updating to the best seats ever) and only had it in 3d and I hate 3d movies.

Saw Creed instead, and enjoyed it.
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
39358 posts
Posted on 12/14/15 at 9:23 am to
Not a huge shock. Chris Hemsworth has proven himself to be a decent actor but he's not much of a box office draw outside of Thor.
Posted by Bluefin
The Banana Stand
Member since Apr 2011
13269 posts
Posted on 12/14/15 at 9:23 am to
I think this would have done better with a February release. Marketing a 1800's survival movie about Moby Dick around the same time as Star Wars and The Revenant just spelled disaster from the get-go.
Posted by tWildcat
Verona, KY
Member since Oct 2014
19423 posts
Posted on 12/14/15 at 9:32 am to
I figured this would happen. Their were only 10 people in the viewing I saw Friday night.
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37502 posts
Posted on 12/14/15 at 10:07 am to
This is another one that suffered form a bad release time.
Posted by Geralt of Rantia
NC State University
Member since Jul 2015
689 posts
Posted on 12/14/15 at 1:06 pm to
If I never had to see Chris Hemsworth on screen again, it would be too soon.
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
25914 posts
Posted on 12/14/15 at 4:18 pm to
I know all of Hollywood can't immediately bow to the new Star Wars movie but am I the only one thinking this does have kind of an impact?

Not that, without Star Wars, this Moby Dick movie would have been a blockbuster. But when it comes to movies who the hell is talking about anything else right now? If people are saving their money and their time to go to the movies this month, guess which movie it's going to be circulated around?

I still can't believe the new Chipmunks movie is being released on the same day. (which will probably do better than the Moby Dick movie)
Posted by Duzz
Houston
Member since Feb 2008
9975 posts
Posted on 12/14/15 at 4:34 pm to
Nobody care about Moby Dick, tell him to go back to filming Thor.
Posted by Carson123987
Middle Court at the Rec
Member since Jul 2011
66514 posts
Posted on 12/14/15 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

Moby Dick "In The Heart of The Sea


upvote for thread title
Posted by S
RIP Wayde
Member since Jan 2007
156150 posts
Posted on 12/16/16 at 8:17 am to
Call me shocked.
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35775 posts
Posted on 12/16/16 at 10:31 am to
Movies that take place in the 19 century in America are a hard sell, unless it's Gone With the Wind.

It's Civil War movies or bust for that century...and most other CW movies have bombed as well.

Almost all popular 19th century period movies take place in Europe.

We have Civil War and Huck Finn on celluloid.
Posted by shutterspeed
MS Gulf Coast
Member since May 2007
63856 posts
Posted on 12/16/16 at 8:50 pm to
Maybe I'm just a savage, but the book was a laborious snoozefest to me.

No way I'd volunteer to pay to see a movie inspired by the book.
Posted by Backinthe615
Member since Nov 2011
6871 posts
Posted on 12/17/16 at 6:08 pm to
Anything with Brendan Gleeson has my attention, and his was the first face I saw when stumbling on the film. I thought it was fairly compelling and well-shot enough to go back and catch the rest. A drawback (for me anyway) was Hemsworth's wtf Boston accent. It was as weirdly in & out as Cumberbatch's in Black Mass.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram