- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Go figure...
Posted on 9/3/15 at 9:20 am
Posted on 9/3/15 at 9:20 am
Judge says Brady can play week one. Why doesn't this surprise me???
Posted on 9/3/15 at 9:22 am to Bayouboogaloocrew
We bore the brunt of Roger's power trip. Sucks for us, but it needs to get fixed at some point.
Posted on 9/3/15 at 9:24 am to Bayouboogaloocrew
your title is embarrassing.
Posted on 9/3/15 at 9:24 am to Bayouboogaloocrew
Fine by me actually. Goodall looks like a completely incompetent idiot once again.
Posted on 9/3/15 at 9:32 am to Bayouboogaloocrew
didn't realize Brady played for the Saints
Posted on 9/3/15 at 9:36 am to Bayouboogaloocrew
Horrible title and thread.
Posted on 9/3/15 at 9:44 am to Bayouboogaloocrew
quote:
by Bayouboogaloocrew
Judge says Brady can play week one. Why doesn't this surprise me???
All player bounty gate suspensions were thrown out as well. Problem was there was no way to fight team and coach fines/suspensions (Kraft just ate the $ suspension).
BS part for Saints fans is that our fines/suspensions that stuck were way more damaging (lost SP for year and 2 high draft picks). The reason for heavy punishment had everything to do with the pending concussion lawsuit which also was BS.
Posted on 9/3/15 at 9:55 am to Bayouboogaloocrew
Saints blew it by not fighting the commish in court.
Posted on 9/3/15 at 10:03 am to Bayouboogaloocrew
Great thread title you frick.
Posted on 9/3/15 at 10:04 am to Bayouboogaloocrew
quote:
Judge says Brady can play week one
As he should. Brady did nothing wrong.
Posted on 9/3/15 at 10:39 am to Bayouboogaloocrew
And the judge was correct in doing so. The CBA clearly states that the punishment for tampering with the ball is a fine. There is no suspension tied to this. Furthermore, there is no proof that Brady stated the balls should be underinflated or tampered with after the refs checked them.
And, in regards to the not cooperating with the cell phone, the league did not differentiate that in any the documents that have been made public(I.e., 2 games for tampering, 2 games for not cooperating); so there was nothing for the judge to uphold the suspension for.
The argument/anger should not be directed towards Brady. It really needs to be at the league & RG for going soft on the team and the Coaching staff. This is where the comparison should be made towards the Saints w/ the alleged bounties. Our team & coaches were punished for not having control of the situation and that they should have had an institutional knowledge of the things that take place within their team.
And, in regards to the not cooperating with the cell phone, the league did not differentiate that in any the documents that have been made public(I.e., 2 games for tampering, 2 games for not cooperating); so there was nothing for the judge to uphold the suspension for.
The argument/anger should not be directed towards Brady. It really needs to be at the league & RG for going soft on the team and the Coaching staff. This is where the comparison should be made towards the Saints w/ the alleged bounties. Our team & coaches were punished for not having control of the situation and that they should have had an institutional knowledge of the things that take place within their team.
Posted on 9/3/15 at 10:41 am to Bayouboogaloocrew
quote:
Why doesn't this surprise me???
I don't know...why doesn't it?
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)