Started By
Message

re: Tropical Storm Erika - fat lady has sung, passed out, & getting dry humped

Posted on 8/29/15 at 9:47 am to
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73775 posts
Posted on 8/29/15 at 9:47 am to
Hasnt the last 10 years been relatively quiet? Especially after the doom and gloom talk of 2005 and how that would be the new normal.
This post was edited on 8/29/15 at 9:48 am
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37845 posts
Posted on 8/29/15 at 10:03 am to
quote:

Weather always interesting to me.


I think this is proof that our weather technology still has a ways to go.

NHC has been clear for days now that they really didn't have much of a handle on this storm.

Here's the issue in perception as I see it. For several days they have been indicating that the storm could collapse. However, they also put out a 5 day track. The track is what everyone looks at and what makes the news. All the "we're not sure" and "it might collapse" language is in the technical discussion that gets released with every advisory. But many people don't read that.

The tech discussions the last day or so also said that the high uncertainty was reason they never posted any watches for Florida.

I think the NHC was honest in admitting they had no idea about this one. I'm not sure that message got to the mass media, and got to the people.
Posted by Stevo
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2004
11670 posts
Posted on 8/29/15 at 10:07 am to
quote:

Daylight savings time is a scam. Suck it.


glad to have taught you something today.
Posted by baytiger
Boston
Member since Dec 2007
46978 posts
Posted on 8/29/15 at 10:29 am to
Yeah, el ninos correlate to below average Atlantic hurricane seasons and above average Pacific ones
Posted by tLSU
Member since Oct 2007
8636 posts
Posted on 8/29/15 at 10:45 am to
The NHC never "admitted they had no idea" what was going on with this storm. Morons who look at models 300 hours out saying "omg look how different!!!!!" is not the equivalent of the NHC. The storm stayed on the path and within the cone projected by the NHC the entire time, and the intensity never went beyond what the NHC projected it to.

This post was edited on 8/29/15 at 11:07 am
Posted by rds dc
Member since Jun 2008
20173 posts
Posted on 8/29/15 at 10:58 am to
quote:

This next wave coming off of Africa should be interesting


Just a name waster, if it gets named.
Posted by rds dc
Member since Jun 2008
20173 posts
Posted on 8/29/15 at 11:12 am to
quote:

I think this is proof that our weather technology still has a ways to go.


This is very true from both a modeling standpoint and an understanding of the mircophysics of clouds and precipitation, etc. You can basically pick any weather topic and start digging into the current research and you will discover there is lots that we still don't understand. For modeling, we will never be able to accurately capture the initial state of the atmosphere and then add in that we don't understand a lot of what is going on and the prospects for improvement seem slim. Models will get better but there is an upper bound for sure.


quote:

NHC has been clear for days now that they really didn't have much of a handle on this storm.

Here's the issue in perception as I see it. For several days they have been indicating that the storm could collapse. However, they also put out a 5 day track. The track is what everyone looks at and what makes the news. All the "we're not sure" and "it might collapse" language is in the technical discussion that gets released with every advisory. But many people don't read that.

The tech discussions the last day or so also said that the high uncertainty was reason they never posted any watches for Florida.

I think the NHC was honest in admitting they had no idea about this one. I'm not sure that message got to the mass media, and got to the people.


Yes, they had a 5 day track with a hurricane approaching Miami but then in the discussion talked about how the forecast was low confidence. The public doesn't read the discussion and the media just reports the graphics. There is a good bit of talk about how to visualize uncertainty and I'm certainly in favor of doing away with the straight line point-to-point plot. Some kind of density graphic would probably work better, esp. beyond D3. Something like this:



Eta: however, I'm not sure how you would educate the public on interpreting a density graphic that conveyed uncertainty of track and intensity
This post was edited on 8/29/15 at 11:19 am
Posted by baytiger
Boston
Member since Dec 2007
46978 posts
Posted on 8/29/15 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

This is very true from both a modeling standpoint and an understanding of the mircophysics of clouds and precipitation, etc.


not only that, but even with a perfect model, we'd never have perfect initializations because there's just so much data to assimilate and it's so expensive to get.

and then the gridpoints can't possibly be small enough to incorporate all of it... and to properly convey all the features that develop over the model period

meteorology is chaos theory's bitch
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
206803 posts
Posted on 8/29/15 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

The entire east coast and gulf coast was under high alert for a storm that was essentially a tropical depression or weaker for about half the time they actually called it a tropical storm



Its always good to be cautious, BUT The Weather Channel goes WAY overboard with its coverage... Not that its a bad thing but I just bet at the WC headquarters they are wishing the storm had some more to it..... I prepare every year no matter if we have a storm or not.... People panic because they are lazy..


Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
280829 posts
Posted on 8/29/15 at 12:16 pm to
serious question, but are trailers anchored down at all?
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
206803 posts
Posted on 8/29/15 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

Just a name waster, if it gets named.



I agree here.. Not sure of what % it is but storms that come off of Africa rarely affect the U.S. Now the ones you need to worry about is the Katrinas and Camielles that start near the gulf.......
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
206803 posts
Posted on 8/29/15 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

but are trailers anchored down at all?



Hell if I know....
Posted by Festus
With Skillet
Member since Nov 2009
85174 posts
Posted on 8/29/15 at 12:22 pm to
Peej, did you call this one?
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
46593 posts
Posted on 8/29/15 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

This next wave coming off of Africa should be interesting
quote:

Just a name waster, if it gets named.
Forget these?

Hurricane Dennis, CAT 3 when it hit the Florida panhandle.

Hurricane Ivan, was a CAT 5, then intensity lowered to a CAT 3 when it hit the Alabama coast.

Hurricane Isabel, the worst hurricane to hit the Chesapeake Bay area in 70 years, causing 17 deaths and $3 billion in damage.

There's more, but the point is... they all originated as a tropical wave coming out of Africa.
Posted by rds dc
Member since Jun 2008
20173 posts
Posted on 8/29/15 at 1:32 pm to
The GFDL whispering sweet nothings to Erika, "I'll never give up on you baby"



Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
142782 posts
Posted on 8/29/15 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

Hasnt the last 10 years been relatively quiet? Especially after the doom and gloom talk of 2005 and how that would be the new normal.

the last "major" hurricane to hit the US Wilma in (wait for it)...


2005

let's remember... Sandy was only cat. 1 hurricane strength when it hit NY/NJ and had actually be downgraded to a post-tropical cyclone at the time of landfall

the other part of Sandy was it merging w/ a cold front and becoming a winter storm after coming onshore
Posted by ellishughtiger
70118
Member since Jul 2004
21135 posts
Posted on 8/29/15 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

Hasnt the last 10 years been relatively quiet? Especially after the doom and gloom talk of 2005 and how that would be the new normal.


The only two I cab recall that caused a stir were Gustav and Issac. I don't think either were hurricanes when they made landfall, though.
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
59254 posts
Posted on 8/29/15 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

Gustav and Issac. I don't think either were hurricanes when they made landfall, though.




What?
Posted by ellishughtiger
70118
Member since Jul 2004
21135 posts
Posted on 8/29/15 at 1:48 pm to
When they made landfall I don't think they were categorized tropical storms and not hurricanes.
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 8/29/15 at 1:52 pm to
But Katrina and global warming!!
Jump to page
Page First 21 22 23 24 25
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 23 of 25Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram