Started By
Message

More 2015 F150 news - Ecoboost engine delivers low fuel economy

Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:14 am
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:14 am
quote:

2.7L EcoBoost V-6: This all-new F-150 pickup engine is compelling for several reasons, particularly the “hybrid” block construction that uses compacted-graphite iron for the upper part and aluminum for the bottom, as well as aluminum heads with integrated exhaust manifolds.

There are lots of interesting technologies onboard, from the fracture-split connecting rods and variable-displacement oil pump to the structural die-cast front engine cover and deep-set fuel injectors capable of four spurts per combustion event.


But there’s a big problem: The observed fuel economy is not that good. The EPA says this engine should get 26 mpg (9 L/100 km) on the highway with 2-wheel drive. Our 4x4 supercab never got close to that, even under a light foot.


quote:

Several editors drove the truck for 253 miles (407 km), and the trip computer displayed a low of 17.6 mpg (13.3 L/100 km) and a high of 19 mpg (12.3 L/100 km).


quote:

This engine has impressive power and torque (325 hp and 375 lb.-ft.[508 Nm]). But heck, we’ve driven 5.0L V-8 F-150s that delivered better mileage.


LINK
This post was edited on 1/8/15 at 11:16 am
Posted by PapaPogey
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2008
39635 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:16 am to
I can say the same about my 13
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:20 am to
So who came up with that 29 number?
Posted by Road Tiger
SW Landmass
Member since Oct 2014
834 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:21 am to
quote:

The observed fuel economy is not that good


This is my shocked face

Posted by LSUGUMBO
Shreveport, LA
Member since Sep 2005
8602 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:24 am to
My '13 Ecoboost has gotten 14.5 in town at best- usually around 13.5. I know that the 20" wheels and 4x4 have something to do with that, but it's a far cry from the 17 that the sticker showed
Posted by jordan21210
Member since Apr 2009
13418 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:40 am to
Yeah, Wards called out the entire Eco lineup. Not sure how they get their EPA numbers.
Posted by KingRanch
The Ranch
Member since Mar 2012
61627 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:44 am to
I'll take two
Posted by Jack Daniel
In the bottle
Member since Feb 2013
25740 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:47 am to
So a truck doesn't get the advertised fuel mileage?
Posted by rattlebucket
SELA
Member since Feb 2009
11555 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:55 am to
My company car 2010 Fusion without ecoboost avg'd 30 mpg. My 2013 Fusion with same driving habits with ecoboost gets avg 24 mpg.
Posted by Thib-a-doe Tiger
Member since Nov 2012
35578 posts
Posted on 1/8/15 at 1:59 pm to
At least with the Tundra you know you're not gonna get great mileage



ETA: allegedly
This post was edited on 1/8/15 at 2:03 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram