- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
More 2015 F150 news - Ecoboost engine delivers low fuel economy
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:14 am
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:14 am
quote:
2.7L EcoBoost V-6: This all-new F-150 pickup engine is compelling for several reasons, particularly the “hybrid” block construction that uses compacted-graphite iron for the upper part and aluminum for the bottom, as well as aluminum heads with integrated exhaust manifolds.
There are lots of interesting technologies onboard, from the fracture-split connecting rods and variable-displacement oil pump to the structural die-cast front engine cover and deep-set fuel injectors capable of four spurts per combustion event.
But there’s a big problem: The observed fuel economy is not that good. The EPA says this engine should get 26 mpg (9 L/100 km) on the highway with 2-wheel drive. Our 4x4 supercab never got close to that, even under a light foot.
quote:
Several editors drove the truck for 253 miles (407 km), and the trip computer displayed a low of 17.6 mpg (13.3 L/100 km) and a high of 19 mpg (12.3 L/100 km).
quote:
This engine has impressive power and torque (325 hp and 375 lb.-ft.[508 Nm]). But heck, we’ve driven 5.0L V-8 F-150s that delivered better mileage.
LINK
This post was edited on 1/8/15 at 11:16 am
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:16 am to weagle99
I can say the same about my 13
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:20 am to weagle99
So who came up with that 29 number?
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:21 am to weagle99
quote:
The observed fuel economy is not that good
This is my shocked face
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:24 am to weagle99
My '13 Ecoboost has gotten 14.5 in town at best- usually around 13.5. I know that the 20" wheels and 4x4 have something to do with that, but it's a far cry from the 17 that the sticker showed
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:40 am to weagle99
Yeah, Wards called out the entire Eco lineup. Not sure how they get their EPA numbers.
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:47 am to weagle99
So a truck doesn't get the advertised fuel mileage?
Posted on 1/8/15 at 11:55 am to weagle99
My company car 2010 Fusion without ecoboost avg'd 30 mpg. My 2013 Fusion with same driving habits with ecoboost gets avg 24 mpg.
Posted on 1/8/15 at 1:59 pm to weagle99
At least with the Tundra you know you're not gonna get great mileage
ETA: allegedly
ETA: allegedly
This post was edited on 1/8/15 at 2:03 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News