quote:
I will say that you fabricating a lie that you know is false to say that I threatened the life of a public official is par for the course. It's shameful and it's chilling to debate. That's just something you don't do, and I appreciate everybody that called you out for it.

I didn't lie. I simply said that what you wrote could be construed as such, which is true. I have done nothing bannable. And if I was banned, it wouldn't be the first time so I don't really care.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Jake88

Member since Apr 2005

68496 posts

Posted on 12/20/14 at 10:18 pm to TxTiger82

The only way "toast" in reference to a politician could be construed as a threat is when someone wants to be a contrarian nitpicker looking for any means to gain attention. It's clearly a reference to re-election and has been used by both sides of the spectrum when referring to election chances.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Lsupimp

Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake

Member since Nov 2003

79146 posts

Posted on 12/20/14 at 10:30 pm to TxTiger82

You did lie. You took the word "toast", IN A POST WHERE I EXPLICITELY CONDEMNED VIOLENCE, and DISHONESTLY extrapolated that I intended to commit violence against a public official. You twisted my words into amazing contortions to slur me. That's a shameful fricking thing to do. You then repeated it multiple times. Even after you got called out multiple times. Everybody knows what feigned concern looks like, and everybody quickly pegged you for the disingenuous asshat that you are.

You should be banned for that shite. That is Dan Kern kind of stuff. It's the antithesis of what this board is all about. We disagree. We disagree vehemently. BUT UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES DO WE TRY TO CRIMINALIZE THAT DISAGREEMENT. You strike me as one of those guys who tells the teacher that your classmate wouldn't share his fig newton with you who grows up to "swat" his enemies. If you had any shame, you'd be feeling it. Since you don't , my condolences on your lack of character.