- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

St. Lucia/Colombia/South Africa/Zambia/Ivory Coast
Posted on 10/16/14 at 3:16 pm
Posted on 10/16/14 at 3:16 pm
have all banned visitors from Guinea, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Nigeria, & Senegal.
Right now over 30 countries & rapidly growing have instituted travel bans including: Chad, South Sudan, Rwanda, Tanzania, Angola, Zimbawe, Namibia, Botswana, Madagascar, Kenya, & Mauritius. yet out incompetent President is too worried about his polling numbers to institute the travel ban.
Right now over 30 countries & rapidly growing have instituted travel bans including: Chad, South Sudan, Rwanda, Tanzania, Angola, Zimbawe, Namibia, Botswana, Madagascar, Kenya, & Mauritius. yet out incompetent President is too worried about his polling numbers to institute the travel ban.
Posted on 10/16/14 at 3:17 pm to ihometiger
Those backwards arse, minority ran devils.
Posted on 10/16/14 at 3:20 pm to ihometiger
"Travel bans will do nothing to stop the spread of Ebola."
Sincerely,
Your Semi-retired President Barack Obama
Sincerely,
Your Semi-retired President Barack Obama
Posted on 10/16/14 at 3:21 pm to GumboPot
quote:
"Travel bans will do nothing to stop the spread of Ebola."
Sincerely,
Your Semi-retired President Barack Obama
how much of the planet are we going to quarantine to keep ebola out? does that really protect us from ebola?
Posted on 10/16/14 at 3:22 pm to ihometiger
Why is noone banning anyone from the Congo? They have an outbreak right now too!!!
This post was edited on 10/16/14 at 3:24 pm
Posted on 10/16/14 at 3:23 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
how much of the planet are we going to quarantine to keep ebola out? does that really protect us from ebola?
Yes it protects us because right now the residents of these countries who are infected hear about how US citizens are being treated and released from Ebola so they are trying to get to the US so that our hospital system can treat them. This is what took place with Duncan.
Posted on 10/16/14 at 3:25 pm to ihometiger
quote:
Yes it protects us because right now the residents of these countries who are infected hear about how US citizens are being treated and released from Ebola so they are trying to get to the US so that our hospital system can treat them. This is what took place with Duncan.
So shut down our entire border because 1 person got through got it
Posted on 10/16/14 at 3:28 pm to ihometiger
Young male citizens of Guinea, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Nigeria, & Senegal would have looked like Obama's son if Michelle wouldn't have eaten the kid first.
Posted on 10/16/14 at 3:28 pm to carbola
quote:
So shut down our entire border because 1 person got through got it
1 person infected 2. How many are potential at risk because of these 2? At least 130 (flight from Dallas to Cleveland). Hopefully none, but if several from the flight are infected, who have they been in contact with? Do you see the snowball forming? Or are you too concerned with being politically correct to the far left wing nutjobs?
Posted on 10/16/14 at 3:29 pm to carbola
quote:
So shut down our entire border because 1 person got through got it
1 person got through and infected 2 others within a very short time. One of those may have infected her SO, the other went on a plane ride with 100+ people.
That's just from the one person that got through.
Posted on 10/16/14 at 3:30 pm to BugAC
quote:
1 person infected 2. How many are potential at risk because of these 2? At least 130 (flight from Dallas to Cleveland). Hopefully none, but if several from the flight are infected, who have they been in contact with? Do you see the snowball forming? Or are you too concerned with being politically correct to the far left wing nutjobs?
so the question still remains to what extent do we need to block out travel to other countries in order to be safe from ebola?
Posted on 10/16/14 at 3:31 pm to BugAC
You know what this reminds me of? with all of the liberal apologists defending Obama, saying, "only 1 person has Ebola" and that it's nearly impossible to spread?
The Obamacare proponents who were saying that the conservatives fears of Obamacare were dramatized, and that it was unlikely to be what we all feared. 2 years later and guess what, Obamacare is EXACTLY what the right has been saying it would be. An utter failure.
You lefties need to realize, there are times when the rats must abandon ship. Now would be an opportune time for you.
The Obamacare proponents who were saying that the conservatives fears of Obamacare were dramatized, and that it was unlikely to be what we all feared. 2 years later and guess what, Obamacare is EXACTLY what the right has been saying it would be. An utter failure.
You lefties need to realize, there are times when the rats must abandon ship. Now would be an opportune time for you.
Posted on 10/16/14 at 3:32 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
how much of the planet are we going to quarantine to keep ebola out? does that really protect us from ebola?
It's a delaying tactic. The longer we fight it over there, the more likely we are to be ready (vaccines, procedures for containment, etc) when it finally makes it into the wild here.
Posted on 10/16/14 at 3:32 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
so the question still remains to what extent do we need to block out travel to other countries in order to be safe from ebola?
Until the disease is contained, the threat of widespread contamination is heightened.
How many people must be infected with Ebola before common sense rears it's head?
This post was edited on 10/16/14 at 3:34 pm
Posted on 10/16/14 at 3:33 pm to Bard
quote:
It's a delaying tactic. The longer we fight it over there, the more likely we are to be ready (vaccines, procedures for containment, etc) when it finally makes it into the wild here
This isn't the first ever ebola outbreak. However, this is the worst. It has been defeated in the past, by isolating and burning the dead bodies, and anything contaminated. That's how you control this virus. Destroy it.
Posted on 10/16/14 at 3:33 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
how much of the planet are we going to quarantine to keep ebola out? does that really protect us from ebola?
The purpose of "banning" is to slow the spread of the virus. If you halt it, then all the better. But you'll never know by doing nothing.
I believe there is a messaging problem coming from the WH.
You could say we are "banning" travel from said counties and the actual process is to screen travelers, quarantine certain individuals, etc.
Or you could say "travel bans will do nothing to stop the spread of Ebola" and implement a process to screen travelers, quarantine certain individuals, etc.
Both process are the same. However, in the former case you make the citizens feel good and secure. In the latter case the public loses confidence in your ability to handle the situation.
Posted on 10/16/14 at 3:34 pm to BugAC
quote:
Until the disease is contained, the thread of widespread contamination is minimal.
so no travel outside the US until we cure ebola?
Posted on 10/16/14 at 3:34 pm to BugAC
quote:
1 person infected 2. How many are potential at risk because of these 2? At least 130 (flight from Dallas to Cleveland). Hopefully none, but if several from the flight are infected, who have they been in contact with? Do you see the snowball forming? Or are you too concerned with being politically correct to the far left wing nutjobs?
I realize that I normally don't come into contact with other people's bodily fluids. Hell I'm IN WEST AFRICA right now and they aren't freaking out as much as some of the people I've seen in the US.
I don't care about political correctness at all. I just don't freak the hell out over this stuff like y'all do. Let's just assume we shut down our border, what's to stop them from flying to Canada/Mexico and then crossing the border. If they are that desperate to get here, they will get here.
Honestly I was probably more worried about Swine Flu than this and I barely cared about that
ETA: Since when does not freaking about this and not caring if we ban travel make me an Obama apologist/Democrat?
This post was edited on 10/16/14 at 3:37 pm
Posted on 10/16/14 at 3:35 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
so no travel outside the US until we cure ebola?
Um, no. No travel to/from Liberia and other contagion countries where contraction of the disease is heightened. You know, common fricking sense.
Posted on 10/16/14 at 3:38 pm to BugAC
quote:
Um, no. No travel to/from Liberia and other contagion countries where contraction of the disease is heightened. You know, common fricking sense.
So ban all of our doctors from helping and soldiers (which I still don't understand)?
Back to top

8






