Started By
Message

Should Police Be "Licensed" and Required to have "Malpractice" Insurance?

Posted on 10/6/14 at 7:29 pm
Posted by undecided
Member since May 2012
15492 posts
Posted on 10/6/14 at 7:29 pm
quote:

@radleybalko: But for video: Jury awards Oregon man beaten by cops $500K after surveillance video contradicts police report. LINK

Saw this on twitter and also read the story of the Grandmother who got over 95,000 after being harassed by police. In many if these incidents officers bear no personal responsibility, are placed on paid leave, and often return to their jobs as normal.

Body cameras and dash cams have worked but would knowing they're going to be financially responsible further reduce instances of financial misconduct? This should be something separate from Unions that would reduce the financial burden on local governments and make them less likely to support officers in wrongdoing

Also, like in most licensed profession repeated instances of misconduct should result in progressive discipline and eventual disbarment from the profession

Thoughts?
This post was edited on 10/6/14 at 7:32 pm
Posted by INFIDEL
The couch
Member since Aug 2006
16199 posts
Posted on 10/6/14 at 7:31 pm to
You would have to pay them a hell of a lot more
Posted by LT
The City of St. George
Member since May 2008
5151 posts
Posted on 10/6/14 at 7:32 pm to
They make like $30K/year... How do they pay for this?
Posted by LSUEnvy
Hou via Lake Chas
Member since May 2011
12121 posts
Posted on 10/6/14 at 7:32 pm to
quote:

Thoughts?


Doctors can barely afford malpractice ins and you want cops to buy it?
Posted by blue_morrison
Member since Jan 2013
5163 posts
Posted on 10/6/14 at 7:48 pm to
So uh. The 'license' is a commission by the state, where they must maintain that status by taking so many classes or complete training per year, which does not include mandatory certifications. So yes, police are licensed.

That's here in AL at least
Posted by Mr Fusion
The American Dream City
Member since Dec 2010
7457 posts
Posted on 10/6/14 at 7:48 pm to
They do have to be licensed.
Posted by stout
Smoking Crack with Hunter Biden
Member since Sep 2006
167858 posts
Posted on 10/6/14 at 8:55 pm to
I really don't want someone who might have to protect me one day worrying about what sort of hit it could make on their premium.
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92877 posts
Posted on 10/6/14 at 8:55 pm to
Im not so sure about that but you should be able to hold them personally liable and sue them for everything they have if they ruin your life unjustly.
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57586 posts
Posted on 10/6/14 at 9:00 pm to
quote:

In many if these incidents officers bear no personal responsibility, are placed on paid leave, and often return to their jobs as normal.


One of our troopers shot and killed a P&P officer in a training exercise. He's still on the job.

LINK
This post was edited on 10/6/14 at 9:02 pm
Posted by Pavoloco83
Acworth Ga. too many damn dawgs
Member since Nov 2013
15347 posts
Posted on 10/6/14 at 9:06 pm to
Nobody would be a police officer if they were personally liable to some lying sack of shite criminal.

This is a low paying, high risk job. Who would do this job? You?
Posted by TigerGman
Center of the Universe
Member since Sep 2006
11342 posts
Posted on 10/6/14 at 9:23 pm to
quote:

Also, like in most licensed profession repeated instances of misconduct should result in progressive discipline and eventual disbarment from the profession



You think a cop's a professional?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram