- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/30/14 at 8:23 am to Brguy33
the creeps here were posting info on the minor kid which is off limits
names and pics of whores were fine
names and pics of whores were fine
Posted on 9/30/14 at 8:24 am to yellowfin
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/24/22 at 1:05 pm
Posted on 9/30/14 at 8:25 am to jivy26
nah the whores had been posted for a good 24 hrs before it was deleted
Posted on 9/30/14 at 8:25 am to jivy26
it should have been whacked earlier…idiots were combing the high school football roster and posting names of the player they thought it was…just utter stupidity to be trying to out a minor who may have been a victim of sexual assault in the eyes of the law.
Posted on 9/30/14 at 8:28 am to yellowfin
quote:
nah the whores had been posted for a good 24 hrs before it was deleted
which is why I was surprised to see it last so long, considering it was all hearsay
Posted on 9/30/14 at 8:29 am to Croacka
Couldn't have all been hearsay.
Lotta facts in that thread.
Lotta facts in that thread.
Posted on 9/30/14 at 8:36 am to CAD703X
did the original thread get whacked? if so, why?
Posted on 9/30/14 at 8:42 am to Ford Frenzy
2 threads have been wacked. Maybe 3. The second one didn't have anything about the kid or any pictures. Just the names of the teachers. Not sure why that one was removed. I may have missed something at the end though.
Posted on 9/30/14 at 8:44 am to ell_13
I think pictures were added in the second one.
Posted on 9/30/14 at 8:48 am to John Doe
quote:
Posted by John DoeI think pictures were added in the second one.
So pictures are frowned upon in this establishment?
Posted on 9/30/14 at 8:50 am to Tiger Ryno
He had sex with 2 hot teachers, oh the humanity.
Posted on 9/30/14 at 8:53 am to jivy26
I don't know, post pics of the two and see.
Posted on 9/30/14 at 8:58 am to John Doe
Why the frick would pictures be frowned upon?
Posted on 9/30/14 at 8:58 am to Ford Frenzy
If they put them up they'll be somethinged upon, but it won't be frowned
Posted on 9/30/14 at 9:00 am to jivy26
quote:
Man they are killing these threads like it's nobody's business.
Thats because the OT cant control itself
Posted on 9/30/14 at 9:05 am to CAD703X
hot- yes
not so hot - yes
ugly- probably
not so hot - yes
ugly- probably
This post was edited on 9/30/14 at 9:07 am
Posted on 9/30/14 at 9:09 am to Tiger Ryno
quote:
just utter stupidity to be trying to out a minor who may have been a victim of sexual assault in the eyes of the law.
I want to know if this minor is going to be charged with whatever law it is that makes it unlawful to film a partner unknowingly?
That is, of course, assuming that the female teachers didn't know that they were being filmed.
War on womenz!!!
Posted on 9/30/14 at 9:22 am to CAD703X
quote:I would die from giving too many high fives.
would you want everyone to know?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News