Started By
Message
locked post

NY "women only" cab company

Posted on 9/12/14 at 10:58 am
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 10:58 am
This is BS(Bitch shite).

This is only more evidence that women are segregationists.

quote:

A new livery service starting Sept. 16 in New York City, Westchester County and Long Island will offer female drivers exclusively, for female riders, according to its founder. It will take requests for rides through an app, and dispatch drivers sporting hot pink pashmina scarves. The service will be called SheTaxis — SheRides in New York City because of regulations barring it from using “taxi” in its name — and aims to serve women who may feel uncomfortable being driven by men, or who simply prefer the company of other women.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
73763 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 10:59 am to
Maybe they are just afraid to ride in a cab with you?
Posted by Green Chili Tiger
Lurking the Tin Foil Hat Board
Member since Jul 2009
50258 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 11:00 am to
quote:

This is only more evidence that women are segregationists.


I know right? Next thing you know they will want their own bathrooms.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138021 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 11:01 am to
If this is ok, then the Muslim cab drivers who refuse to let service dogs in their cabs due to religious beliefs should be left alone.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
127758 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 11:06 am to
What if I am a male that identifies female?
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
79730 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 11:06 am to
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
87726 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 11:07 am to
so you don't think a private company should be allowed to make it's own choices as to the clientele it accepts?
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
76373 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 11:09 am to
quote:

so you don't think a private company should be allowed to make it's own choices as to the clientele it accepts?



I surely do. When I own my business, I won't provide accounting services or products for any skin heads or hate groups.
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
70096 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 11:11 am to
Private company can run their business as they see fit, however fricking retarded that vision may be.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
79730 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 11:12 am to
If they are all driving taxis, who will make the sammiches?
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 11:14 am to
quote:

Maybe they are just afraid to ride in a cab with you?


Fail.

I live in California and don't drive a cab.

This is blatantly unconstitutional.

Just substitute "White people" where it says, "women" and "Black people" where it says, "men".

This post was edited on 9/12/14 at 11:19 am
Posted by TheFolker
Member since Aug 2011
5434 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 11:18 am to
quote:

female drivers exclusively


No thanks.
Posted by ehidal1
Chief Boot Knocka
Member since Dec 2007
37318 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 11:21 am to
quote:

so you don't think a private company should be allowed to make it's own choices as to the clientele it accepts?

Do you agree with the cake maker who refused the gay couple service?
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 11:23 am to
quote:

This is blatantly unconstitutional.
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 11:25 am to
quote:

Private company can run their business as they see fit, however fricking retarded that vision may be.


bullshite.

A private company providing a service to the public cannot discriminate against someone based on their gender.

Why do you hate the US Constitution?
Posted by TigernMS12
Member since Jan 2013
5661 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 11:28 am to
Good luck with this under equal protection. Sex is considered a protected class under the constitution.

Private or not
This post was edited on 9/12/14 at 11:29 am
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
73763 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 11:28 am to
Living in SanFran would make me crazy mad. No way I could do it.
Posted by MrFreakinMiyagi
Reseda
Member since Feb 2007
19686 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 11:38 am to
quote:

A private company providing a service to the public cannot discriminate against someone based on their gender.

This would be a case of men being discriminated against, and we aren't as whiny as people with vaginas.

That's why you don't see men protesting in front of Shapes gyms, but do hear bitches whining about cases like Augusta National.

My advice.... Let's not whine like the vagina people. We are the superior gender. Let's act above the inferior one.
This post was edited on 9/12/14 at 11:46 am
Posted by Holden Caulfield
Hanging with J.D.
Member since May 2008
8308 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 11:40 am to
Women only colleges are now accepting anyone who feels they are a woman. Why does this cab company hate the confused?
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 11:43 am to
quote:

A private company providing a service to the public cannot discriminate against someone based on their gender.
You don't get out much, do you?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram