- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Many high lottery picks available
Posted on 6/4/14 at 2:35 pm to NOSHAU
Posted on 6/4/14 at 2:35 pm to NOSHAU
quote:
However, there is no team that is going to give us a lottery pick for Gordon and his contract.
quote:
ESPN’s Chad Ford is reporting that fair number of late lottery level picks could be had in trade, especially as some of those teams look to swap an unproven draft pick for a proven veteran.
idk bud
Gordon is still 25. A team could see last year as getting his feet back under him after the injuries, and 2014-2015 could be his return to the 20 ppg scorer he was a few years ago.
Can't underestimate NBA GMs. You never know.
Posted on 6/4/14 at 2:40 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
Can't underestimate NBA GMs. You never know.
VERY true. Every year there is some stupid team that does something horrific.
On a related note, I was on a Pistons board and they are Sooooooooooooooo happy they got Jeff Bower. It is really funny.
Posted on 6/4/14 at 2:47 pm to GynoSandberg
One thing to keep in mind is that every team on the list besides the Bucks and of course Timberwolves have tried to insert themselves in the Kevin Love sweepstakes. This could be Ford stretching "Kevin Love Package" into Vets > Kids.
That being said, there are more assets (both cap space and high draft picks) than desirable talent. If a team saw the writing on the wall and decided to be 1st in line for scraps instead of last, I could see it happening. But nobody should get their hopes up. I don't think we're talking Charlotte giving us #9 and cap space for Gordon. If it happened it'd probably be closer to Boston giving Gerald Wallace and #6 for Gordon and Rivers.
That being said, there are more assets (both cap space and high draft picks) than desirable talent. If a team saw the writing on the wall and decided to be 1st in line for scraps instead of last, I could see it happening. But nobody should get their hopes up. I don't think we're talking Charlotte giving us #9 and cap space for Gordon. If it happened it'd probably be closer to Boston giving Gerald Wallace and #6 for Gordon and Rivers.
Posted on 6/4/14 at 3:10 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:I cannot imagine there is any GM that would give up a top pick for a guy with his injury history and contract. If he were cheap, it may be worth a shot, but he is clearly not worth that contract.
idk bud Gordon is still 25. A team could see last year as getting his feet back under him after the injuries, and 2014-2015 could be his return to the 20 ppg scorer he was a few years ago. Can't underestimate NBA GMs. You never know.
Posted on 6/4/14 at 6:07 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
could be his return to the 20 ppg scorer he was a few years ago.
Gordon stats are already solid. If he got even a few of the calls from the refs he should then he would have the averages most would want. I just would rather move Gordon because he has the worst contract and we have Evans and Rivers. I would rather spend that money on a C and SF.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News