- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I never knew "nu-metal" was a derogatory term.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 8:07 am to FourThreeForty
Posted on 5/29/14 at 8:07 am to FourThreeForty
Wasn't really familiar with this genre, but all those bands listed were god awful... Glad I was too old to have to be a party to that crap...
I had enough growing up with Hair Metal...
I had enough growing up with Hair Metal...
Posted on 5/29/14 at 8:11 am to Baloo
quote:
But I do admit I hate nu metal more than I actually hate it because it is the death knell of 90s grunge and alt-rock. there was a genuine attempt in the early 90s by mainstream artists to make earnest, socially conscious music. And year, earnestness never ages well, but within just a few years, the dominant rock music was angry, humorless, and just mean. There was a brief era there were girls could go to shows without getting groped, but now we're back to trying to get women to show their tits on the jumbotron. It's embarrassing. And there was a sudden backlash to "****s" and "bitches". When just a few years earlier, everyone was invited in the big Loser tent together
"Woodstock 99" was a horrible scene.
I used to consider myself as a huge grunge fan but I've realized over the years that what I liked was the music and not so much the social conscience side of it. The music scene in Seattle was an exclusive club. Their thoughts were that if we make it big then we've sold out. Cobain struggled with this as did all of Pearl Jam. That type of mentality is self destructive. It's almost like they wanted to call the shots on their own music which is great theoretically but that mentality falls in on itself when a large group of people start to like your music. It's almost selfish.
The most popular grunge bands could have put out great music well into the future if they would have dropped the dope and self-pity while accepting that music is something that all people enjoy and it's not to be hoarded. Pearl Jam did this and they are still making the music they want to make.
quote:
I’ll never get Korn and Limp Bizkit. I’ll always consider nü-metal a symptom of the nihilism, self-absorption, and arrogance percolating in American culture in the late ’90s, before it flowered into something really ugly a few years later. I find nothing inspiring about this music. I feel that I am right about this. But I suspect this opinion is meaningless, because I’m just playing the role nü-metal wanted me to play. I was the adult now
This sounds depressing because it's basically "I don't understand these kids' music anymore". But I do understand his sentiments.
If nothing else at least nu-metal was innovative.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 8:26 am to LesMiles BFF
quote:
Their thoughts were that if we make it big then we've sold out.
That wasn't just "grunge," that could be seen as the mind set for indie rock, as a whole... But, I'll give you a band like PJ didn't have time to mature as a touring band, they were snatched up from the beginning and were huge..
IMO, that was just a scene that was exploited to the nth degree by MTV, record companies, etc... looking to "market" the next biggest thing, so I can get the resentment.. bands like STP were propped up to bands like Nirvana and considered equals (kinda) But a band like Tad, all ugly dudes, were great but overlooked (for the most part)..
quote:
It's almost selfish.
I don't understand how making the music you want to make, the way you want to make it, is being selfish? A band is not allowed to progress and grow... perhaps changing their sound along the way? Sure you may lose some fans because of it, but thats natural...
This post was edited on 5/29/14 at 8:28 am
Posted on 5/29/14 at 8:36 am to Baloo
quote:
And no one likes to see their youth die so quickly or in such an ugly fashion.
this is pretty much the backbone of your argument. you came of age during the grunge era, so you prefer it
the hair metal guys who preceeded you hated grunge for similar reasons (grunge's grittiness and "low" nature" was a direct rejection of the materialism and spectacle nature of cock rock). cock rock got popular and derivative, which made it worse
rap-rock was a rejection of the somber, suicidal, serious nature of grunge. it was energetic, explosive, simple, etc
i bridged both genres (as i'm a few years younger than you), so i was never truly invested in either. both are forgettable, but both have their place
a lot of the original acts did have a lot of things you claim you like from grunge, too. rage was political. korn had that emo/whining/pussy angle to it that grunge loved (and for the record i hated korn).
the anger of rap-rock kind of evened out with the next major genre: pop punk. it had all the energy of rap rock that rejected the boring arse grunge era, but it wasn't nearly as angry. it worked for parties and driving around
Posted on 5/29/14 at 9:01 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
both are forgettable, but both have their place
I would say that for the most part you are right, but the "grunge" era produced bands that were critically acclaimed, as well as, will go down as all time great bands... bands that will be in the RnR HOF (whatever that means) and remembered by people for years to come... I don't thing you can say the same about Nu-Metal with the exception of maybe, RATM (who I don't care for musically)
This post was edited on 5/29/14 at 9:03 am
Posted on 5/29/14 at 9:08 am to SlowFlowPro
System Of A Down was great for a bit then, but I never considered them to be anything like those other bands.
I was forever amazed that after the heights reached by so many 90's bands, dog shite like Limp Bizkit or Papa Roach found such fame.
I was forever amazed that after the heights reached by so many 90's bands, dog shite like Limp Bizkit or Papa Roach found such fame.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 9:15 am to TFTC
i think that you're thinking more of the "pop" wave and not a lot of the earlier stuff, which was pretty well regarded
my memory may be fading, but korn, for example (who i never liked) was pretty well respected for the first few albums
my memory may be fading, but korn, for example (who i never liked) was pretty well respected for the first few albums
Posted on 5/29/14 at 9:18 am to Sayre
quote:
I was forever amazed that after the heights reached by so many 90's bands, dog shite like Limp Bizkit or Papa Roach found such fame.
it's not really that shocking. popular music shifts and the shift usually is a rejection of the prior pop genre
grunge was boring, moody, depressing, confusing (in an attempt to be intellectual), demanding, etc
so what replaced it? a very energetic/emotional and simpler music
it's like how rap went through similar shifts. gangsta rap for the early 90s merged into club/party rap...and then people got tired of being pussies and then P blew up because he was still doing gangsta rap...and then people got tired of being so hard/serious and club rap showed back up
same shite in rock. serious/boring to angry/energetic to fun/energetic...to serious/boring
Posted on 5/29/14 at 9:32 am to TFTC
quote:
I don't understand how making the music you want to make, the way you want to make it, is being selfish? A band is not allowed to progress and grow... perhaps changing their sound along the way? Sure you may lose some fans because of it, but thats natural...
Well sure they are allowed to grow. It was just the whininess of it all. Anytime I hear old grunge artist interviewed I hear about how all the bands that came after the initial grunge wave were posers. And some were, but to say bands like Collective Soul and Live were posers is just being exclusive as I doubt either of those bands were trying to be grunge.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 9:38 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
cock rock
really? WTF?
quote:
Wasn't really familiar with this genre, but all those bands listed were god awful... Glad I was too old to have to be a party to that crap...
I had enough growing up with Hair Metal...
Pretty much in line with my thinking.
This post was edited on 5/29/14 at 9:39 am
Posted on 5/29/14 at 9:38 am to TFTC
quote:
RATM
Another one I don't consider nu metal. Nu metal bands certainly took some influence from Rage, though.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 9:45 am to Galactic Inquisitor
My nu metal definition and band inclusion, is going off of this thread only...
I was aware of the names of some of these bands, but as a whole was listening to far different kinda music...
I can only sit and wonder if i was 15 when these bands came out, would I have liked them??? I mean, I kinda get the appeal to a teenager..
I was aware of the names of some of these bands, but as a whole was listening to far different kinda music...
I can only sit and wonder if i was 15 when these bands came out, would I have liked them??? I mean, I kinda get the appeal to a teenager..
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:00 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
this is pretty much the backbone of your argument. you came of age during the grunge era, so you prefer it
Of course. I wasn't being coy. I stated that bluntly. But I do like a lot of what came after, just not nu metal. In fact, the late 90s were a near golden age for indie rock. Just tons of great stuff was being made, and I love a ton of it (Modest Mouse, Neutral Milk Hotel, Sleater-Kinney, etc). So it's not just simply "I got old", which I freely admit.
It's that we had ideals and values that didn't just fail to survive, but were gleefully trampled. And now as a father of a daughter, I feel even stronger about the grunge era's attempts at gender equity, ham-fisted as they were. Nu metal was picking up the nihilism of punk with none of the wit. I don't mourn that music changed, because I moved on to new things as well, I mourned that it changed to something ugly and mean (not to mention racist, sexist, and homophobic).
quote:
a lot of the original acts did have a lot of things you claim you like from grunge, too. rage was political. korn had that emo/whining/pussy angle to it that grunge loved (and for the record i hated korn).
Rage started in 1991. Evil Empire was in 1996. They weren't a grunge band, but they are of that era. Rage was a peer to Pearl Jam, albeit doing something entirely different. Hey, STP wasn't grunge either.
Korn... well, the mere fact you describe their music as whining pussy music pretty much sums up every problem I have with nu metal. Though I actually do like Freak on a Leash. Korn is pretty hit and miss for me, but I do feel they are a band trapped in permanent adolescence. I might've liked em when I was 15 and now have fond memories of being 15, but I encountered them way too late.
It's like Minor Threat. I love Minor Threat. But I can't imagine ever being that angry. I know I was when I was 12, but I just don't relate to that and can't even mentally put my self in that place. That said, when I listen to Minor Threat, I don't hear rage, I hear the fun times I had when I was a kid. I hear sepia-toned nostalgia. Nu metal will never occupy that space for me because of where I was in life when I first encountered it.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:29 am to TFTC
Nu metal was metal with a strong rap influence. RATM fits this mold. Some bands like Godsmack and Deftones get lumped into this group but I don't think they deserve it.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 11:41 am to Sayre
quote:
System Of A Down was great for a bit then, but I never considered them to be anything like those other bands.
quote:I dont know anything about Godsmack but Deftones is certainly categorized with nu metal. SOAD was just metal... not sure if it could even be lumped into nu metal... I wouldn't say that not ever.
Some bands like Godsmack and Deftones get lumped into this group but I don't think they deserve it.
Korn and Deftones did a ton together early on. Over time it is clear that Deftones was just a great metal/rock band... just don't think you can call them nu metal nor does anyone use the term unless they are describing some of the crap that has been described in this thread( LB and LP)
I think what a lot of you are trying to say is Numetal is MTVs fault.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 11:46 am to JohnZeroQ
Deftones certainly spawned out of it, but they grew and evolved. I'll still listen to them today, because they write good songs.
I always thought Godsmack was awful.
I always thought Godsmack was awful.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 11:54 am to JohnZeroQ
Basically every hard rock and metal band that came out in the late 90's got lumped into the nu metal genre whether it fit them or not.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 12:00 pm to Brosef Stalin
This is true.
When I think Nu Metal--
Limp Bizkit
Korn
Staind(at first)
Linkin Park
any others?
I would have said Deftones THEN but not NOW.
When I think Nu Metal--
Limp Bizkit
Korn
Staind(at first)
Linkin Park
any others?
I would have said Deftones THEN but not NOW.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 12:32 pm to JohnZeroQ
Does Incubus count as nu metal? I really enjoyed their first few albums.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News