Started By
Message

re: Pay Attention Politards: THIS Is How You Win A Real Debate

Posted on 5/19/14 at 4:59 pm to
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134887 posts
Posted on 5/19/14 at 4:59 pm to
quote:

How is an opposing team supposed to rebut a personal experience and what criteria can be used to validate that the experience is even factual?


I understand your point, but let's just say that one of the debaters on the subject of the President's war powers was a combat veteran. Wouldn't that particular experience be relevant to the subject? Should that person's experience be kicked out as conjecture because it cannot be validated?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423384 posts
Posted on 5/19/14 at 5:04 pm to
quote:

but let's just say that one of the debaters on the subject of the President's war powers was a combat veteran. Wouldn't that particular experience be relevant to the subject?

nope, unless he was involved in policy making or a clerk on the court case, and then happened to go to war

quote:

Should that person's experience be kicked out as conjecture because it cannot be validated?

it should be kicked out for being irrelevant to the discussion at hand
Posted by LesMiles BFF
Lafayette
Member since May 2014
5101 posts
Posted on 5/19/14 at 5:23 pm to
quote:


I understand your point, but let's just say that one of the debaters on the subject of the President's war powers was a combat veteran. Wouldn't that particular experience be relevant to the subject? Should that person's experience be kicked out as conjecture because it cannot be validated?


Yep

quote:

Appeal to Authority
Explanation
An appeal to authority is an argument from the fact that a person judged to be an authority affirms a proposition to the claim that the proposition is true.

Appeals to authority are always deductively fallacious; even a legitimate authority speaking on his area of expertise may affirm a falsehood, so no testimony of any authority is guaranteed to be true.

However, the informal fallacy occurs only when the authority cited either (a) is not an authority, or (b) is not an authority on the subject on which he is being cited. If someone either isn’t an authority at all, or isn’t an authority on the subject about which they’re speaking, then that undermines the value of their testimony.


Logical Fallacies
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram