- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mall of Louisiana
Posted on 5/16/14 at 2:49 pm to doubleb
Posted on 5/16/14 at 2:49 pm to doubleb
quote:No, I didn't. I was relying upon a previous post by you.
You ASSumed
In that post it was in your interest for the point you were making to lead readers to believe your children attended EBR schools rather than private schools. You were being duplicitous (look it up).
Today it was in your interest to reveal your kids transferred to private schools. That interest was your constant and desperate attempts to make a 'gotcha statement' to prove me wrong about something.
You're appearing to be especially senile today. And desperate. And forgetful.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 2:53 pm to TROLA
I simply called out the self proclaimed genius. In fact I called him an idiot. If that upsets you then you are being childish about it. But, you are entitled to your opinion. It does not change the fact that he is an idiot.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 2:57 pm to russinbr
quote:
Posted by Message russinbr Mall of Louisiana I simply called out the self proclaimed genius. In fact I called him an idiot. If that upsets you then you are being childish about it. But, you are entitled to your opinion. It does not change the fact that he is an idiot.
He isn't an idiot, he thinks the rest of us are.
He's going to continue to split hairs, parse words, reinvent an argument until he believes we all forgot just how wrong he initially was.
That's his style when he is caught fabricating FACTs.
You see what we all see, but his buddies never say it.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 2:58 pm to doubleb
quote:To what?
Link please????
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:07 pm to doubleb
quote:
He's going to continue to split hairs, parse words, reinvent an argument until he believes we all forgot just how wrong he initially was.
That's a two way street..
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:14 pm to doubleb
In reading these threads, I cannot help but notice that the guy says things that are completely contradictory.
Says SG supporters are all horrible racists, but then begs them to stay in EBR schools to make them better
Says SG is dead now that MC has annexed the mall but still desperately wants to stop a vote by the people
Says SG gets its share of money and then some from the taxes we pay but also claims BR budget will crater without SG money to prop it up.
Claims to be super smart but cannot even comprehend a simple piece of legislation that moves tax revenues from one entity to the other.
Insists on links for commonly known facts but can't provide links for real points of substance.
I originally thought he was pretty good at providing useful information but now see that he just makes up whatever he thinks supports the argument he wants to make at the moment.
Says SG supporters are all horrible racists, but then begs them to stay in EBR schools to make them better
Says SG is dead now that MC has annexed the mall but still desperately wants to stop a vote by the people
Says SG gets its share of money and then some from the taxes we pay but also claims BR budget will crater without SG money to prop it up.
Claims to be super smart but cannot even comprehend a simple piece of legislation that moves tax revenues from one entity to the other.
Insists on links for commonly known facts but can't provide links for real points of substance.
I originally thought he was pretty good at providing useful information but now see that he just makes up whatever he thinks supports the argument he wants to make at the moment.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:19 pm to LSURussian
quote:Nice apples to oranges comparison. How do Baker, Zachary and Central apply to one comparison differently from the other? What is the population of EBR less Baker, Zachary and Central, whom you pointed out have their own school systems and budgets?
SG's population = approximately 1/4 of the population of EBR. SG's geographical area = approximately 1/4 of the area of EBR excluding the combined areas of Baker, Zachary and Central which have their own school systems and budgets.
Using Wikipedia as a primary source, I was able to determine that East Baton Rouge Parish had a population of 440,171 per the 2010 census, and it consists of 471 square miles of territory. Baton Rouge had a population of 229,553, and has 79 square miles of territory. Baler had 13,895 people, and 8 square miles of territory. Central had 26,864 people, and 66 square miles of territory. Zachary had 14,960 people and 24 square miles of territory. That means the population of unincorporated areas East Baton Rouge Parish was 154,899, and the unincorporated territory was 294 square miles if Baton Rouge, Baker, Central and Zachary are removed from the figures for East Baton Rouge Parish.
Having this information pointed out to you, would you care to revise your claims of "approximately 1/4"?
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:20 pm to TROLA
[quote]That's a two way street.. [/quote
Yes it is.
Have you ever seen anything I posted that said my kids never attended a private school?
Have you seen anything by me that said my kids were never in public school?
So tell me sir , what is Russian going on and on about ?
Yes it is.
Have you ever seen anything I posted that said my kids never attended a private school?
Have you seen anything by me that said my kids were never in public school?
So tell me sir , what is Russian going on and on about ?
This post was edited on 5/16/14 at 3:25 pm
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:39 pm to Poodlebrain
quote:No. For a tax guy you're not very good with numbers. I wrote SG is approximately = to 1/4 of the population and area of EBR. That is a true statement.
Having this information pointed out to you, would you care to revise your claims of "approximately 1/4"?
I have no idea why you are attempting to make a comparison with all of the unincorporated area of EBR. SG is NOT the entire unincorporated area of EBR.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:41 pm to doubleb
quote:
Have you seen anything by me that said my kids were never in public school?
Strawman.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:44 pm to tdg
quote:Link or you're a liar.
Says SG supporters are all horrible racists,
quote:
desperately wants to stop a vote by the people
Link or you're a liar.
quote:Kettle, meet pot.
now see that he just makes up whatever he thinks supports the argument he wants to make at the moment.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 3:54 pm to LSURussian
Russian its time for you to move on to some other pressing local issue. Since, in your opinion, the SG issue is dead go spend your energy elsewhere. We will keep on keeping on.
You have repeatedly made a fool of yourself with unfounded claims in these threads, never mind the fact you lost a bet and were supposed to ban yourself.
You have repeatedly made a fool of yourself with unfounded claims in these threads, never mind the fact you lost a bet and were supposed to ban yourself.
Posted on 5/16/14 at 4:06 pm to Sprocket46
Nah, I think I'll stick around and enjoy the fun....
Posted on 5/16/14 at 4:51 pm to LSURussian
quote:No shite Sherlock. And all of EBR isn't who St. George should be compared to either, which you happened to do. The proposed St. George is greater than 1/4 of the people and area covered by the EBRPSS. And the ratio gets even worse for you if we limit the population to only school age children.
I have no idea why you are attempting to make a comparison with all of the unincorporated area of EBR. SG is NOT the entire unincorporated area of EBR.
I'm not a big fan of JR Ball, but I think he sums up the issues pretty well in this editorial. LINK And here is another by Rolfe McCollister LINK. How many more interested parties do you need expressing the same concerns before you concede that the poor performance of the EBRPSS is, and always has been, the fundamental issue. Continuing to utilize available tax revenue in the same fashion has proven it will not remedy the situation. Why do you oppose trying new methods to utilize the same tax revenue to get better results? Is your opposition based on some belief it is impossible, or even unlikely, that new organizations could get better results?
Posted on 5/16/14 at 4:52 pm to Poodlebrain
Nice diversion. But still a fail on your part.
Eta:
Only slightly. Hence "approximately."
Eta:
quote:
The proposed St. George is greater than 1/4 of the people and area covered by the EBRPSS.
Only slightly. Hence "approximately."
This post was edited on 5/16/14 at 4:55 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News